Radosław Lenarczyk, Marco Proietti, Jan F. Scheitz, Dipen Shah, Eberhard Siebert, Diana A. Gorog, Jacek Kowalczyk, Nikolaos Bonaros, George Ntaios, Wolfram Doehner, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Sandor Nardai, Jan Kovac, Roland Fiszer, Roberto Lorusso, Eliano Navarese, Sergio Castrejón, Andrea Rubboli, José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca, Alaide Chieffo, Gregory Y. H. Lip
{"title":"侵入性心血管手术造成的临床和亚临床急性脑损伤","authors":"Radosław Lenarczyk, Marco Proietti, Jan F. Scheitz, Dipen Shah, Eberhard Siebert, Diana A. Gorog, Jacek Kowalczyk, Nikolaos Bonaros, George Ntaios, Wolfram Doehner, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Sandor Nardai, Jan Kovac, Roland Fiszer, Roberto Lorusso, Eliano Navarese, Sergio Castrejón, Andrea Rubboli, José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca, Alaide Chieffo, Gregory Y. H. Lip","doi":"10.1038/s41569-024-01076-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past 50 years, the number and invasiveness of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures globally have increased substantially. However, cardiovascular interventions are inherently associated with a risk of acute brain injury, both periprocedurally and postprocedurally, which impairs medical outcomes and increases health-care costs. Current international clinical guidelines generally do not cover the area of acute brain injury related to cardiovascular invasive procedures. In this international Consensus Statement, we compile the available knowledge (including data on prevalence, pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical presentation and management) to formulate consensus recommendations on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of acute brain injury caused by cardiovascular interventions. We also identify knowledge gaps and possible future directions in clinical research into acute brain injury related to cardiovascular interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18976,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":41.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and subclinical acute brain injury caused by invasive cardiovascular procedures\",\"authors\":\"Radosław Lenarczyk, Marco Proietti, Jan F. Scheitz, Dipen Shah, Eberhard Siebert, Diana A. Gorog, Jacek Kowalczyk, Nikolaos Bonaros, George Ntaios, Wolfram Doehner, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Sandor Nardai, Jan Kovac, Roland Fiszer, Roberto Lorusso, Eliano Navarese, Sergio Castrejón, Andrea Rubboli, José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca, Alaide Chieffo, Gregory Y. H. Lip\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41569-024-01076-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Over the past 50 years, the number and invasiveness of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures globally have increased substantially. However, cardiovascular interventions are inherently associated with a risk of acute brain injury, both periprocedurally and postprocedurally, which impairs medical outcomes and increases health-care costs. Current international clinical guidelines generally do not cover the area of acute brain injury related to cardiovascular invasive procedures. In this international Consensus Statement, we compile the available knowledge (including data on prevalence, pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical presentation and management) to formulate consensus recommendations on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of acute brain injury caused by cardiovascular interventions. We also identify knowledge gaps and possible future directions in clinical research into acute brain injury related to cardiovascular interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":41.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-024-01076-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-024-01076-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical and subclinical acute brain injury caused by invasive cardiovascular procedures
Over the past 50 years, the number and invasiveness of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures globally have increased substantially. However, cardiovascular interventions are inherently associated with a risk of acute brain injury, both periprocedurally and postprocedurally, which impairs medical outcomes and increases health-care costs. Current international clinical guidelines generally do not cover the area of acute brain injury related to cardiovascular invasive procedures. In this international Consensus Statement, we compile the available knowledge (including data on prevalence, pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical presentation and management) to formulate consensus recommendations on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of acute brain injury caused by cardiovascular interventions. We also identify knowledge gaps and possible future directions in clinical research into acute brain injury related to cardiovascular interventions.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Cardiology aims to be the go-to source for reviews and commentaries in the scientific and clinical communities it serves. Focused on providing authoritative and accessible articles enriched with clear figures and tables, the journal strives to offer unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, maximizing the usefulness and impact of each publication. It covers a broad range of content types, including Research Highlights, Comments, News & Views, Reviews, Consensus Statements, and Perspectives, catering to practising cardiologists and cardiovascular research scientists. Authored by renowned clinicians, academics, and researchers, the content targets readers in the biological and medical sciences, ensuring accessibility across various disciplines. In-depth Reviews offer up-to-date information, while Consensus Statements provide evidence-based recommendations. Perspectives and News & Views present topical discussions and opinions, and the Research Highlights section filters primary research from cardiovascular and general medical journals. As part of the Nature Reviews portfolio, Nature Reviews Cardiology maintains high standards and a wide reach.