设计一项基于位置的病例对照研究,研究美国行人死亡的建筑环境风险因素。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae377
Andrew G Rundle, Stephen P Uong, Michael D M Bader, Eliza W Kinsey, Dirk Kinsey, Gina S Lovasi, Stephen J Mooney, Kathryn M Neckerman, James W Quinn
{"title":"设计一项基于位置的病例对照研究,研究美国行人死亡的建筑环境风险因素。","authors":"Andrew G Rundle, Stephen P Uong, Michael D M Bader, Eliza W Kinsey, Dirk Kinsey, Gina S Lovasi, Stephen J Mooney, Kathryn M Neckerman, James W Quinn","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The location-based case-control design is a useful approach for studies where the exposures of interest are aspects of the environment around the location of a health event such as a pedestrian fatality. In this design locations are the unit of analysis and an enumerated cohort of locations are followed through time for the health events of interest and a case-control study of locations is nested within the cohort. Locations where events occurred (case-locations) are compared to matched locations where these events did not occur (control-locations). We describe the application of this design to the issue of pedestrian fatalities using a cohort of 9,612,698 intersections, 17,737,728 road segments, and 222,318 entrance/exit ramp segments that existed in 2017 across all 384 U.S. Metropolitan Statistical Areas. This cohort of locations was followed up from Jan 1, 2017 to Dec 31, 2018 for pedestrian fatalities using the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Fatality Analysis Reporting System. In total, 10,587 fatalities were identified as having occurred on cohort locations and 21,174 matched control locations were selected using incidence density sampling. Geographic information systems, spatially linked administrative data sets and virtual neighborhood audits via Google Street View are underway to characterize study locations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design of a Location-Based Case-Control Study of Built Environment Risk Factors for Pedestrian Fatalities in the U.S.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew G Rundle, Stephen P Uong, Michael D M Bader, Eliza W Kinsey, Dirk Kinsey, Gina S Lovasi, Stephen J Mooney, Kathryn M Neckerman, James W Quinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aje/kwae377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The location-based case-control design is a useful approach for studies where the exposures of interest are aspects of the environment around the location of a health event such as a pedestrian fatality. In this design locations are the unit of analysis and an enumerated cohort of locations are followed through time for the health events of interest and a case-control study of locations is nested within the cohort. Locations where events occurred (case-locations) are compared to matched locations where these events did not occur (control-locations). We describe the application of this design to the issue of pedestrian fatalities using a cohort of 9,612,698 intersections, 17,737,728 road segments, and 222,318 entrance/exit ramp segments that existed in 2017 across all 384 U.S. Metropolitan Statistical Areas. This cohort of locations was followed up from Jan 1, 2017 to Dec 31, 2018 for pedestrian fatalities using the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Fatality Analysis Reporting System. In total, 10,587 fatalities were identified as having occurred on cohort locations and 21,174 matched control locations were selected using incidence density sampling. Geographic information systems, spatially linked administrative data sets and virtual neighborhood audits via Google Street View are underway to characterize study locations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae377\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae377","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于地点的病例对照设计是一种有用的研究方法,其研究对象是健康事件(如行人死亡事故)发生地点周围环境的暴露因素。在这种设计中,地点是分析的单位,对感兴趣的健康事件进行时间跟踪,并在队列中嵌套地点病例对照研究。将发生事件的地点(病例地点)与未发生事件的匹配地点(对照地点)进行比较。我们以 2017 年存在于美国所有 384 个大都会统计区的 9,612,698 个交叉口、17,737,728 个路段和 222,318 个入口/出口匝道段为队列,描述了这种设计在行人死亡问题上的应用。从 2017 年 1 月 1 日到 2018 年 12 月 31 日,美国国家公路交通安全管理局死亡事故分析报告系统对这批地点的行人死亡事故进行了跟踪调查。共确定了 10,587 起死亡事故发生在队列地点,并采用发病密度抽样法选出了 21,174 个匹配的对照地点。目前正在利用地理信息系统、空间链接的行政数据集和通过谷歌街景进行的虚拟街区审计来确定研究地点的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design of a Location-Based Case-Control Study of Built Environment Risk Factors for Pedestrian Fatalities in the U.S.

The location-based case-control design is a useful approach for studies where the exposures of interest are aspects of the environment around the location of a health event such as a pedestrian fatality. In this design locations are the unit of analysis and an enumerated cohort of locations are followed through time for the health events of interest and a case-control study of locations is nested within the cohort. Locations where events occurred (case-locations) are compared to matched locations where these events did not occur (control-locations). We describe the application of this design to the issue of pedestrian fatalities using a cohort of 9,612,698 intersections, 17,737,728 road segments, and 222,318 entrance/exit ramp segments that existed in 2017 across all 384 U.S. Metropolitan Statistical Areas. This cohort of locations was followed up from Jan 1, 2017 to Dec 31, 2018 for pedestrian fatalities using the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Fatality Analysis Reporting System. In total, 10,587 fatalities were identified as having occurred on cohort locations and 21,174 matched control locations were selected using incidence density sampling. Geographic information systems, spatially linked administrative data sets and virtual neighborhood audits via Google Street View are underway to characterize study locations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
All-Cause Mortality and 1990-1991 Gulf War Service within the Millennium Cohort Study (2001-2021). Using Double Negative Controls to Adjust for Healthy User Bias in a Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Safety Study. Modern Sources of Controls in Case-Control Studies. Editorial consultants 1. Characterizing state-level structural cisheterosexism trajectories using sequence and cluster analysis, 1996-2016, 50 U.S. states and Washington, D.C., and associations with health status and healthcare outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1