肿瘤科护士对道德敏感性的舒适度与道德压力之间的关系:描述性相关研究

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Seminars in Oncology Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151742
Samira Beiranvand , Kourosh Zarea , Shahram Molavynejad , Simin Madhooshi , Parisa Sheini Jaberi
{"title":"肿瘤科护士对道德敏感性的舒适度与道德压力之间的关系:描述性相关研究","authors":"Samira Beiranvand ,&nbsp;Kourosh Zarea ,&nbsp;Shahram Molavynejad ,&nbsp;Simin Madhooshi ,&nbsp;Parisa Sheini Jaberi","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the relationship between perceived comfort level with moral distress and moral sensitivity among oncology nurses</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a descriptive-correlational study on 210 oncology nurses. The samples were selected through the convenience method from September 2020 to February 2022 in the oncology centers of Ahvaz, Iran. Data were collected via a demographic form, Lutzen's Modified Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire, Corley's Moral Distress Scale, and Kolcaba's Nurses Comfort Questionnaire (NCQ). Data were analyzed using SPSS V24, descriptive statistics, Independent t, Mann-Whitney-U, Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson's correlation coefficient, ANOVA, and linear regression tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nurses experienced a moderate level of perceived comfort (67.91 ± 8.75), moral sensitivity (58.4 ± 13.3), and moral distress (57.54.8 ± 8.9). Moral sensitivity was significantly inversely related to the intensity of moral distress (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). A statistically significant relationship was found between nurses' perceived comfort level with frequency of distress (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and moral sensitivity (<em>P</em> = .046). Moral distress explained 13.8% of changes in perceived comfort level (R2 = 0.138, F = 6.51, sig &lt; 0.001, R = 0.371).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Nurses’ perceived comfort level, moral sensitivity, and moral distress were at a moderate level and intercorrelated. It is suggested that factors contributing to moral distress should be eliminated. Also, moral sensitivity should be refined as a decisive factor.</div></div><div><h3>Implication for Nursing Practice</h3><div>Oncology nurses are exposed to morally distressing situations that may be a source of discomfort. This study guides nurses, managers, planners, and policymakers to identify the contributing factors and use strategies and solutions to enhance nurses' perceived comfort level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":"40 6","pages":"Article 151742"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Perceived Comfort Level with Moral Sensitivity and Moral Distress Among Oncology Nurses: A Descriptive Correlational Study\",\"authors\":\"Samira Beiranvand ,&nbsp;Kourosh Zarea ,&nbsp;Shahram Molavynejad ,&nbsp;Simin Madhooshi ,&nbsp;Parisa Sheini Jaberi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the relationship between perceived comfort level with moral distress and moral sensitivity among oncology nurses</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a descriptive-correlational study on 210 oncology nurses. The samples were selected through the convenience method from September 2020 to February 2022 in the oncology centers of Ahvaz, Iran. Data were collected via a demographic form, Lutzen's Modified Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire, Corley's Moral Distress Scale, and Kolcaba's Nurses Comfort Questionnaire (NCQ). Data were analyzed using SPSS V24, descriptive statistics, Independent t, Mann-Whitney-U, Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson's correlation coefficient, ANOVA, and linear regression tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nurses experienced a moderate level of perceived comfort (67.91 ± 8.75), moral sensitivity (58.4 ± 13.3), and moral distress (57.54.8 ± 8.9). Moral sensitivity was significantly inversely related to the intensity of moral distress (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). A statistically significant relationship was found between nurses' perceived comfort level with frequency of distress (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and moral sensitivity (<em>P</em> = .046). Moral distress explained 13.8% of changes in perceived comfort level (R2 = 0.138, F = 6.51, sig &lt; 0.001, R = 0.371).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Nurses’ perceived comfort level, moral sensitivity, and moral distress were at a moderate level and intercorrelated. It is suggested that factors contributing to moral distress should be eliminated. Also, moral sensitivity should be refined as a decisive factor.</div></div><div><h3>Implication for Nursing Practice</h3><div>Oncology nurses are exposed to morally distressing situations that may be a source of discomfort. This study guides nurses, managers, planners, and policymakers to identify the contributing factors and use strategies and solutions to enhance nurses' perceived comfort level.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":\"40 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 151742\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124002274\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124002274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在探讨肿瘤科护士感知到的道德困扰舒适度与道德敏感性之间的关系 方法:本研究是一项描述性相关研究,研究对象为 210 名肿瘤科护士。样本于 2020 年 9 月至 2022 年 2 月在伊朗阿瓦士的肿瘤中心通过方便法选取。研究通过人口统计学表格、Lutzen's Modified Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire、Corley's Moral Distress Scale 和 Kolcaba's Nurses Comfort Questionnaire (NCQ) 收集数据。数据分析采用 SPSS V24、描述性统计、独立 t、Mann-Whitney-U、Kruskal-Wallis、皮尔逊相关系数、方差分析和线性回归测试:护士的感知舒适度(67.91 ± 8.75)、道德敏感度(58.4 ± 13.3)和道德困扰度(57.54.8 ± 8.9)处于中等水平。道德敏感度与道德困扰强度呈明显的反比关系(P < .001)。在统计学上,护士感知的舒适度与困扰频率(P < .001)和道德敏感度(P = .046)之间存在明显关系。道德困扰解释了 13.8%的感知舒适度变化(R2 = 0.138,F = 6.51,sig < 0.001,R = 0.371):护士的感知舒适度、道德敏感性和道德困扰处于中等水平且相互关联。建议应排除导致道德困扰的因素。对护理实践的意义:对护理实践的启示:肿瘤科护士经常会遇到道德困扰的情况,这些情况可能会让她们感到不适。本研究指导护士、管理者、规划者和政策制定者识别诱发因素,并使用策略和解决方案来提高护士的感知舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Relationship Between Perceived Comfort Level with Moral Sensitivity and Moral Distress Among Oncology Nurses: A Descriptive Correlational Study

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between perceived comfort level with moral distress and moral sensitivity among oncology nurses

Methods

This is a descriptive-correlational study on 210 oncology nurses. The samples were selected through the convenience method from September 2020 to February 2022 in the oncology centers of Ahvaz, Iran. Data were collected via a demographic form, Lutzen's Modified Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire, Corley's Moral Distress Scale, and Kolcaba's Nurses Comfort Questionnaire (NCQ). Data were analyzed using SPSS V24, descriptive statistics, Independent t, Mann-Whitney-U, Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson's correlation coefficient, ANOVA, and linear regression tests.

Results

Nurses experienced a moderate level of perceived comfort (67.91 ± 8.75), moral sensitivity (58.4 ± 13.3), and moral distress (57.54.8 ± 8.9). Moral sensitivity was significantly inversely related to the intensity of moral distress (P < .001). A statistically significant relationship was found between nurses' perceived comfort level with frequency of distress (P < .001) and moral sensitivity (P = .046). Moral distress explained 13.8% of changes in perceived comfort level (R2 = 0.138, F = 6.51, sig < 0.001, R = 0.371).

Conclusion

Nurses’ perceived comfort level, moral sensitivity, and moral distress were at a moderate level and intercorrelated. It is suggested that factors contributing to moral distress should be eliminated. Also, moral sensitivity should be refined as a decisive factor.

Implication for Nursing Practice

Oncology nurses are exposed to morally distressing situations that may be a source of discomfort. This study guides nurses, managers, planners, and policymakers to identify the contributing factors and use strategies and solutions to enhance nurses' perceived comfort level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Seminars in Oncology Nursing Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Masthead Nonpharmacological Interventions for the Fatigue–Pain–Sleep Disturbance Symptom Cluster in Lung Cancer Patients: Best Evidence Summary Development of a Scale to Assess Cancer Attitude in the Community The Effect of Virtual Reality Distraction and Fatigue Training on Anxiety and Fatigue Levels in Children with Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1