使用布莱登评分评估败血症患者谵妄和死亡风险:一项回顾性研究

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17476
Xinya Li, Yonglan Tang, Zihong Bai, Xin Liang, Xiaxuan Huang, Jianguang Chen, Hongtao Cheng, Jun Lyu, Yu Wang
{"title":"使用布莱登评分评估败血症患者谵妄和死亡风险:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Xinya Li, Yonglan Tang, Zihong Bai, Xin Liang, Xiaxuan Huang, Jianguang Chen, Hongtao Cheng, Jun Lyu, Yu Wang","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To provide a viable tool for the early clinical identification of high-risk populations in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis-associated delirium (SAD) has the potential to significantly impact the short- and long-term prognosis of patients. However, accurately predicting and effectively managing SAD remains a significant challenge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a retrospective analysis of adult sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for the first time. Patients were divided into two groups based on their initial Braden score upon admission to the ICU: a high-risk group (≤ 15 points) and a low-risk group (> 15 points). The relationship between Braden score and delirium was assessed using logistic regression and restricted cubic splines, while restricted mean survival time was employed to analyse the relationship between Braden scores and patients' 90- and 180-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 28,312 patients included in the study, those in the high-risk group exhibited a significantly elevated risk of delirium (44.8% vs. 29.7%) and higher 90-day (28.7% vs. 19.4%) and 180-day (33.2% vs. 24.1%) mortality rates (all p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding variables, logistic regression demonstrated that the risk of delirium was 1.54 times higher in the high-risk group (95% CI = 1.45-1.64, p < 0.001). Following propensity score matching, the difference in survival was statistically significant at both time points, with the high-risk group having a reduced survival rate of 7.50 days (95% CI = -8.24, -6.75; p < 0.001) and 15.74 days (95% CI = -17.40, -14.08; p < 0.001) at 90 days and 180 days, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Braden score is a simple and effective tool for the early identification of patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes in sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>The Braden score can be employed by clinical nurses for the purpose of early identification of poor prognostic risk in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study was conducted according to the Strengthening Research in Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Patients were involved in the sample of the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Risk of Delirium and Death in Sepsis Using the Braden Score: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Xinya Li, Yonglan Tang, Zihong Bai, Xin Liang, Xiaxuan Huang, Jianguang Chen, Hongtao Cheng, Jun Lyu, Yu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To provide a viable tool for the early clinical identification of high-risk populations in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis-associated delirium (SAD) has the potential to significantly impact the short- and long-term prognosis of patients. However, accurately predicting and effectively managing SAD remains a significant challenge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a retrospective analysis of adult sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for the first time. Patients were divided into two groups based on their initial Braden score upon admission to the ICU: a high-risk group (≤ 15 points) and a low-risk group (> 15 points). The relationship between Braden score and delirium was assessed using logistic regression and restricted cubic splines, while restricted mean survival time was employed to analyse the relationship between Braden scores and patients' 90- and 180-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 28,312 patients included in the study, those in the high-risk group exhibited a significantly elevated risk of delirium (44.8% vs. 29.7%) and higher 90-day (28.7% vs. 19.4%) and 180-day (33.2% vs. 24.1%) mortality rates (all p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding variables, logistic regression demonstrated that the risk of delirium was 1.54 times higher in the high-risk group (95% CI = 1.45-1.64, p < 0.001). Following propensity score matching, the difference in survival was statistically significant at both time points, with the high-risk group having a reduced survival rate of 7.50 days (95% CI = -8.24, -6.75; p < 0.001) and 15.74 days (95% CI = -17.40, -14.08; p < 0.001) at 90 days and 180 days, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Braden score is a simple and effective tool for the early identification of patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes in sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>The Braden score can be employed by clinical nurses for the purpose of early identification of poor prognostic risk in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study was conducted according to the Strengthening Research in Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Patients were involved in the sample of the study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17476\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17476","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the Risk of Delirium and Death in Sepsis Using the Braden Score: A Retrospective Study.

Aims and objectives: To provide a viable tool for the early clinical identification of high-risk populations in patients with sepsis.

Background: Sepsis-associated delirium (SAD) has the potential to significantly impact the short- and long-term prognosis of patients. However, accurately predicting and effectively managing SAD remains a significant challenge.

Methods: This study employed a retrospective analysis of adult sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for the first time. Patients were divided into two groups based on their initial Braden score upon admission to the ICU: a high-risk group (≤ 15 points) and a low-risk group (> 15 points). The relationship between Braden score and delirium was assessed using logistic regression and restricted cubic splines, while restricted mean survival time was employed to analyse the relationship between Braden scores and patients' 90- and 180-day mortality.

Results: Of the 28,312 patients included in the study, those in the high-risk group exhibited a significantly elevated risk of delirium (44.8% vs. 29.7%) and higher 90-day (28.7% vs. 19.4%) and 180-day (33.2% vs. 24.1%) mortality rates (all p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding variables, logistic regression demonstrated that the risk of delirium was 1.54 times higher in the high-risk group (95% CI = 1.45-1.64, p < 0.001). Following propensity score matching, the difference in survival was statistically significant at both time points, with the high-risk group having a reduced survival rate of 7.50 days (95% CI = -8.24, -6.75; p < 0.001) and 15.74 days (95% CI = -17.40, -14.08; p < 0.001) at 90 days and 180 days, respectively.

Conclusions: The Braden score is a simple and effective tool for the early identification of patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes in sepsis.

Design: Retrospective study.

Relevance to clinical practice: The Braden score can be employed by clinical nurses for the purpose of early identification of poor prognostic risk in patients with sepsis.

Reporting method: This study was conducted according to the Strengthening Research in Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.

Patient or public contribution: Patients were involved in the sample of the study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
期刊最新文献
'Towards a conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management-A modified Delphi study'. "But what do you really think?" Nurses' contrasting explicit and implicit attitudes towards people with disabilities using the implicit association test. Nursing standards, language and age as variables associated with clinical competence for nurses in long-term care facilities: A cross-sectional study. Factors related to nurses' beliefs regarding pain assessment in people living with dementia. Factors related to preoperative anxiety in older patients with sensory impairment: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1