混合发电厂的最佳能源调度管理系统:光伏-电网-电池-柴油发电机-抽水蓄能

IF 3.4 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS IEEE Access Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3470652
Fatma Ahmed;Rashid Al-Abri;Hassan Yousef;Ahmed M. Massoud
{"title":"混合发电厂的最佳能源调度管理系统:光伏-电网-电池-柴油发电机-抽水蓄能","authors":"Fatma Ahmed;Rashid Al-Abri;Hassan Yousef;Ahmed M. Massoud","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3470652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective real-time energy management strategies are crucial for optimising hybrid power plants, particularly when challenged with integrating Renewable Energy Sources (RESs) and managing their intermittent nature. This paper presents a comprehensive energy management framework holding real-time optimisation for HPP. The practical implications of this research are significant, as it provides a roadmap for seamlessly integrating RESs with Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESSs) in Hybrid Power Plants (HPPs) to minimise cost while meeting daily household energy demands. Furthermore, it demonstrates how diesel generators (DGs) can be incorporated into the HPP’s energy management system while minimising carbon emissions. An Energy Dispatch Engine (EDE) is introduced to control HPPs that combine PV, BESS, DG and Pumped Hydro Storage (PHS). Two optimisation approaches are used, namely, Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) and Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming (SDDP). The system leverages load and RES power data while considering State-of-Charge (SoC) constraints to manage battery health proactively. Optimising discharge and charge profiles of the BESS, with the overarching goal of minimising the total cost of satisfying daily load demand, is an objective. Various tariff schemes were explored to assess the presented EDE. Our testing demonstrates that the SDDP approach consistently results in lower total costs than MILP. The total cost for the MILP method, where the system with PHS incurs higher costs (219.8 \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n/24h) than the total cost for the SDDP method, where the system with PHS system (180 \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n/24h). The cost of CO2 emissions was found to be lower in the case of SDDP, amounting to 8.3 \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n/24h for a total emission of 160 kg. In contrast, the MILP approach resulted in a higher CO2 cost of 10.2 \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n/24h for a total emission of 200 kg. This suggests that SDDP is more cost-effective in terms of reducing CO2 emissions.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"12 ","pages":"143307-143326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10703070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Optimal Energy Dispatch Management System for Hybrid Power Plants: PV-Grid-Battery-Diesel Generator-Pumped Hydro Storage\",\"authors\":\"Fatma Ahmed;Rashid Al-Abri;Hassan Yousef;Ahmed M. Massoud\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3470652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Effective real-time energy management strategies are crucial for optimising hybrid power plants, particularly when challenged with integrating Renewable Energy Sources (RESs) and managing their intermittent nature. This paper presents a comprehensive energy management framework holding real-time optimisation for HPP. The practical implications of this research are significant, as it provides a roadmap for seamlessly integrating RESs with Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESSs) in Hybrid Power Plants (HPPs) to minimise cost while meeting daily household energy demands. Furthermore, it demonstrates how diesel generators (DGs) can be incorporated into the HPP’s energy management system while minimising carbon emissions. An Energy Dispatch Engine (EDE) is introduced to control HPPs that combine PV, BESS, DG and Pumped Hydro Storage (PHS). Two optimisation approaches are used, namely, Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) and Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming (SDDP). The system leverages load and RES power data while considering State-of-Charge (SoC) constraints to manage battery health proactively. Optimising discharge and charge profiles of the BESS, with the overarching goal of minimising the total cost of satisfying daily load demand, is an objective. Various tariff schemes were explored to assess the presented EDE. Our testing demonstrates that the SDDP approach consistently results in lower total costs than MILP. The total cost for the MILP method, where the system with PHS incurs higher costs (219.8 \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n/24h) than the total cost for the SDDP method, where the system with PHS system (180 \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n/24h). The cost of CO2 emissions was found to be lower in the case of SDDP, amounting to 8.3 \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n/24h for a total emission of 160 kg. In contrast, the MILP approach resulted in a higher CO2 cost of 10.2 \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n/24h for a total emission of 200 kg. This suggests that SDDP is more cost-effective in terms of reducing CO2 emissions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Access\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"143307-143326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10703070\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10703070/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10703070/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的实时能源管理策略对于优化混合发电厂至关重要,尤其是在面临整合可再生能源(RES)和管理其间歇性的挑战时。本文提出了一个全面的能源管理框架,对混合动力发电厂进行实时优化。这项研究具有重要的实际意义,因为它为在混合发电厂(HPP)中无缝集成可再生能源与电池储能系统(BESS)提供了路线图,从而在满足日常家庭能源需求的同时最大限度地降低成本。此外,它还展示了如何将柴油发电机(DGs)纳入混合发电厂的能源管理系统,同时最大限度地减少碳排放。本文介绍了一种能源调度引擎(EDE),用于控制结合了光伏、BESS、DG 和抽水蓄能(PHS)的水力发电厂。该系统采用了两种优化方法,即混合整数线性规划(MILP)和随机双动态规划(SDDP)。该系统利用负载和可再生能源电力数据,同时考虑充电状态 (SoC) 约束条件,主动管理电池健康状况。优化 BESS 的放电和充电曲线是一个目标,其总体目标是最大限度地降低满足每日负载需求的总成本。我们探索了各种电价方案,以评估所提出的 EDE。测试表明,SDDP 方法的总成本始终低于 MILP 方法。MILP 方法的总成本(219.8 ${\$}$ /24h)高于 SDDP 方法的总成本(180 ${\$}$ /24h)。在 SDDP 方法中,二氧化碳排放成本较低,总排放量为 160 千克时,二氧化碳排放成本为 8.3 美元/24 小时。相比之下,MILP 方法的二氧化碳排放成本较高,在总排放量为 200 千克的情况下为 10.2 ${\$}$ /24h。这表明,SDDP 在减少二氧化碳排放方面更具成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Optimal Energy Dispatch Management System for Hybrid Power Plants: PV-Grid-Battery-Diesel Generator-Pumped Hydro Storage
Effective real-time energy management strategies are crucial for optimising hybrid power plants, particularly when challenged with integrating Renewable Energy Sources (RESs) and managing their intermittent nature. This paper presents a comprehensive energy management framework holding real-time optimisation for HPP. The practical implications of this research are significant, as it provides a roadmap for seamlessly integrating RESs with Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESSs) in Hybrid Power Plants (HPPs) to minimise cost while meeting daily household energy demands. Furthermore, it demonstrates how diesel generators (DGs) can be incorporated into the HPP’s energy management system while minimising carbon emissions. An Energy Dispatch Engine (EDE) is introduced to control HPPs that combine PV, BESS, DG and Pumped Hydro Storage (PHS). Two optimisation approaches are used, namely, Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) and Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming (SDDP). The system leverages load and RES power data while considering State-of-Charge (SoC) constraints to manage battery health proactively. Optimising discharge and charge profiles of the BESS, with the overarching goal of minimising the total cost of satisfying daily load demand, is an objective. Various tariff schemes were explored to assess the presented EDE. Our testing demonstrates that the SDDP approach consistently results in lower total costs than MILP. The total cost for the MILP method, where the system with PHS incurs higher costs (219.8 ${\$}$ /24h) than the total cost for the SDDP method, where the system with PHS system (180 ${\$}$ /24h). The cost of CO2 emissions was found to be lower in the case of SDDP, amounting to 8.3 ${\$}$ /24h for a total emission of 160 kg. In contrast, the MILP approach resulted in a higher CO2 cost of 10.2 ${\$}$ /24h for a total emission of 200 kg. This suggests that SDDP is more cost-effective in terms of reducing CO2 emissions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
期刊最新文献
Corrections to “A Systematic Literature Review of the IoT in Agriculture–Global Adoption, Innovations, Security Privacy Challenges” A Progressive-Assisted Object Detection Method Based on Instance Attention Ensemble Balanced Nested Dichotomy Fuzzy Models for Software Requirement Risk Prediction Enhancing Burn Severity Assessment With Deep Learning: A Comparative Analysis and Computational Efficiency Evaluation Inductor-Less Low-Power Low-Voltage Cross-Coupled Regulated-Cascode Transimpedance Amplifier Circuit in CMOS Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1