基于计算机模拟和体外实验的患者特异性双尖瓣主动脉瓣血液动力学研究

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Acta Mechanica Sinica Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1007/s10409-024-24022-x
Wentao Yan  (, ), Jianming Li  (, ), Bowen Zhang  (, ), Wenshuo Wang  (, ), Lai Wei  (, ), Hongyi Yu  (, ), Shengzhang Wang  (, )
{"title":"基于计算机模拟和体外实验的患者特异性双尖瓣主动脉瓣血液动力学研究","authors":"Wentao Yan \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Jianming Li \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Bowen Zhang \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Wenshuo Wang \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Lai Wei \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Hongyi Yu \n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Shengzhang Wang \n (,&nbsp;)","doi":"10.1007/s10409-024-24022-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital malformation of the aortic valve with various structural characteristics. Different types of BAV can cause secondary aortic diseases, including calcific aortic valve stenosis and aortic dilation, although their pathogenesis remains unclear. In this study, we first established patient-specific BAV simulation models and silicone models (Type 0 A-P, Type 1 R-N, and Type 1 L-R) based on clinical computed tomography angiography (CTA) and pressure data. Next, we applied a research method combining fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation and digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV) experiment to quantitatively analyze the hemodynamic, structural mechanical, and flow field characteristics of patients with different BAV types. Simulation-based hemodynamic parameters and experimental results were consistent with clinical data, affirming the accuracy of the model. The location of the maximum principal strain in the patient-specific model was associated with the calcification site, which characterized the mechanism of secondary aortic valve stenosis. The maximum wall shear stress (WSS) of the patient-specific model (&gt;67.1 Pa) exceeded 37.9 Pa and could cause endothelial surface injury as well as remodeling under long-term exposure, thus increasing the risk of aortic dilation. The distribution of WSS was mainly caused by BAV type, resulting in different degrees of dilation in different parts guided by the type. The patient-specific model revealed a maximum viscous shear stress (VSS) value of 5.23 Pa, which was smaller than the threshold for shear-induced hemolysis of red blood cells (150 Pa) and platelet activation (10 Pa), but close to the threshold for platelet sensitization (6 Pa). The results of flow field characteristics revealed a low risk of hemolysis but a relative high risk of thrombus formation in the patient-specific model. This study not only provides a basis for future comprehensive research on BAV diseases, but also generates relevant insights for theoretical guidance for calcific aortic valve stenosis and aortic dilation caused by different types of BAV, as well as biomechanical evidence for the potential risk of hemolysis and thrombus formation in BAV, which is of great value for clinical diagnosis and treatment of BAV.\n</p><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7109,"journal":{"name":"Acta Mechanica Sinica","volume":"40 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-specific bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics study based on computer simulation and in vitro experiment\",\"authors\":\"Wentao Yan \\n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Jianming Li \\n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Bowen Zhang \\n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Wenshuo Wang \\n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Lai Wei \\n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Hongyi Yu \\n (,&nbsp;),&nbsp;Shengzhang Wang \\n (,&nbsp;)\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10409-024-24022-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital malformation of the aortic valve with various structural characteristics. Different types of BAV can cause secondary aortic diseases, including calcific aortic valve stenosis and aortic dilation, although their pathogenesis remains unclear. In this study, we first established patient-specific BAV simulation models and silicone models (Type 0 A-P, Type 1 R-N, and Type 1 L-R) based on clinical computed tomography angiography (CTA) and pressure data. Next, we applied a research method combining fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation and digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV) experiment to quantitatively analyze the hemodynamic, structural mechanical, and flow field characteristics of patients with different BAV types. Simulation-based hemodynamic parameters and experimental results were consistent with clinical data, affirming the accuracy of the model. The location of the maximum principal strain in the patient-specific model was associated with the calcification site, which characterized the mechanism of secondary aortic valve stenosis. The maximum wall shear stress (WSS) of the patient-specific model (&gt;67.1 Pa) exceeded 37.9 Pa and could cause endothelial surface injury as well as remodeling under long-term exposure, thus increasing the risk of aortic dilation. The distribution of WSS was mainly caused by BAV type, resulting in different degrees of dilation in different parts guided by the type. The patient-specific model revealed a maximum viscous shear stress (VSS) value of 5.23 Pa, which was smaller than the threshold for shear-induced hemolysis of red blood cells (150 Pa) and platelet activation (10 Pa), but close to the threshold for platelet sensitization (6 Pa). The results of flow field characteristics revealed a low risk of hemolysis but a relative high risk of thrombus formation in the patient-specific model. This study not only provides a basis for future comprehensive research on BAV diseases, but also generates relevant insights for theoretical guidance for calcific aortic valve stenosis and aortic dilation caused by different types of BAV, as well as biomechanical evidence for the potential risk of hemolysis and thrombus formation in BAV, which is of great value for clinical diagnosis and treatment of BAV.\\n</p><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Mechanica Sinica\",\"volume\":\"40 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Mechanica Sinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10409-024-24022-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Mechanica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10409-024-24022-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主动脉瓣双尖瓣(BAV)是一种常见的主动脉瓣先天性畸形,具有多种结构特征。不同类型的 BAV 可引起继发性主动脉疾病,包括钙化性主动脉瓣狭窄和主动脉瓣扩张,但其发病机制仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们首先根据临床计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)和压力数据,建立了针对特定患者的 BAV 模拟模型和硅胶模型(0 型 A-P、1 型 R-N 和 1 型 L-R)。接着,我们采用流固相互作用(FSI)模拟和数字粒子图像测速(DPIV)实验相结合的研究方法,定量分析了不同类型 BAV 患者的血流动力学、结构力学和流场特征。基于仿真的血流动力学参数和实验结果与临床数据一致,证实了模型的准确性。患者特异性模型中最大主应变的位置与钙化部位有关,这也是继发性主动脉瓣狭窄的机制特征。患者特异性模型的最大壁剪切应力(>67.1 Pa)超过了 37.9 Pa,在长期暴露的情况下可能导致内皮表面损伤和重塑,从而增加主动脉扩张的风险。WSS的分布主要由BAV类型引起,不同类型导致不同部位的扩张程度不同。患者特异性模型显示最大粘性剪切应力(VSS)值为 5.23 Pa,小于剪切力引起红细胞溶血的阈值(150 Pa)和血小板活化的阈值(10 Pa),但接近血小板敏化的阈值(6 Pa)。流场特征结果显示,在患者特异性模型中,溶血风险较低,但血栓形成的风险相对较高。这项研究不仅为今后BAV疾病的综合研究提供了基础,还为不同类型BAV引起的钙化性主动脉瓣狭窄和主动脉扩张提供了相关的理论指导,并为BAV溶血和血栓形成的潜在风险提供了生物力学证据,对BAV的临床诊断和治疗具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient-specific bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics study based on computer simulation and in vitro experiment

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital malformation of the aortic valve with various structural characteristics. Different types of BAV can cause secondary aortic diseases, including calcific aortic valve stenosis and aortic dilation, although their pathogenesis remains unclear. In this study, we first established patient-specific BAV simulation models and silicone models (Type 0 A-P, Type 1 R-N, and Type 1 L-R) based on clinical computed tomography angiography (CTA) and pressure data. Next, we applied a research method combining fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation and digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV) experiment to quantitatively analyze the hemodynamic, structural mechanical, and flow field characteristics of patients with different BAV types. Simulation-based hemodynamic parameters and experimental results were consistent with clinical data, affirming the accuracy of the model. The location of the maximum principal strain in the patient-specific model was associated with the calcification site, which characterized the mechanism of secondary aortic valve stenosis. The maximum wall shear stress (WSS) of the patient-specific model (>67.1 Pa) exceeded 37.9 Pa and could cause endothelial surface injury as well as remodeling under long-term exposure, thus increasing the risk of aortic dilation. The distribution of WSS was mainly caused by BAV type, resulting in different degrees of dilation in different parts guided by the type. The patient-specific model revealed a maximum viscous shear stress (VSS) value of 5.23 Pa, which was smaller than the threshold for shear-induced hemolysis of red blood cells (150 Pa) and platelet activation (10 Pa), but close to the threshold for platelet sensitization (6 Pa). The results of flow field characteristics revealed a low risk of hemolysis but a relative high risk of thrombus formation in the patient-specific model. This study not only provides a basis for future comprehensive research on BAV diseases, but also generates relevant insights for theoretical guidance for calcific aortic valve stenosis and aortic dilation caused by different types of BAV, as well as biomechanical evidence for the potential risk of hemolysis and thrombus formation in BAV, which is of great value for clinical diagnosis and treatment of BAV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Mechanica Sinica
Acta Mechanica Sinica 物理-工程:机械
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
1807
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Mechanica Sinica, sponsored by the Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, promotes scientific exchanges and collaboration among Chinese scientists in China and abroad. It features high quality, original papers in all aspects of mechanics and mechanical sciences. Not only does the journal explore the classical subdivisions of theoretical and applied mechanics such as solid and fluid mechanics, it also explores recently emerging areas such as biomechanics and nanomechanics. In addition, the journal investigates analytical, computational, and experimental progresses in all areas of mechanics. Lastly, it encourages research in interdisciplinary subjects, serving as a bridge between mechanics and other branches of engineering and the sciences. In addition to research papers, Acta Mechanica Sinica publishes reviews, notes, experimental techniques, scientific events, and other special topics of interest. Related subjects » Classical Continuum Physics - Computational Intelligence and Complexity - Mechanics
期刊最新文献
Contact between deformed rough surfaces Electromechanical coupling vibration characteristics of high-speed train transmission system considering gear eccentricity and running resistance Asynchronous deployment scheme and multibody modeling of a ring-truss mesh reflector antenna Kalman filter based state estimation for the flexible multibody system described by ANCF Nanoindentation behavior in T-carbon thin films: a molecular dynamics study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1