根据地热系统排放段的温度变化修正地热水的循环深度

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1007/s12665-024-11853-2
Cuiming Li, Xumei Mao
{"title":"根据地热系统排放段的温度变化修正地热水的循环深度","authors":"Cuiming Li,&nbsp;Xumei Mao","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-11853-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The circulation depth of geothermal water providing the geothermal system framework significantly dominates the evaluation of renewal capacity and geothermal resources. The traditional evaluation of circulation depth is based on the groundwater temperature variation in the recharge section and the average geothermal heating rate of geothermal system. However, misunderstanding groundwater temperature distribution in geothermal systems will lead to overestimating groundwater circulation depth based on the recharge section. Temperature measurement in a 1000 m geothermal scientific borehole from the Xinzhou geothermal field of south China is discussed as a case study to reassess the circulation depth of geothermal water. For Xinzhou geothermal system, the recharge and discharge temperatures are from 26.2 °C to 32.6 °C and from 67.0 °C to 98.0 °C, respectively. And the heat exchange temperature at the deepest point is from 121 ℃ to 154 ℃. This indicates that the temperature gradient in the recharge section should be greater than that in the discharge section. But the actual observation is opposite that the temperature gradient in the recharge section and in the discharge section is 3.04 ℃/100 m and 4.97 ℃/100 m, respectively. We proposed that the depth of geothermal water circulation evaluated by the temperature change and the geothermal heating rate in the discharge section represents the top depth of convection in the heat exchange zone, and the depth evaluated by the recharge section represents the advection depth of groundwater in the recharge section. The top depth of convection in the heat exchange zone estimated by the discharge Sect. (0.75–1.49 km) is much shallower than the advection depth of groundwater in the recharge Sect. (3.25–4.34 km). In the convective heat exchange zone (between 4.34 km and 1.49 km), the fault zone at a certain depth is the ideal location for geothermal development to extract water and heat.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"83 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction of the circulation depth of geothermal water based on temperature variation in the discharge section of geothermal system\",\"authors\":\"Cuiming Li,&nbsp;Xumei Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-024-11853-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The circulation depth of geothermal water providing the geothermal system framework significantly dominates the evaluation of renewal capacity and geothermal resources. The traditional evaluation of circulation depth is based on the groundwater temperature variation in the recharge section and the average geothermal heating rate of geothermal system. However, misunderstanding groundwater temperature distribution in geothermal systems will lead to overestimating groundwater circulation depth based on the recharge section. Temperature measurement in a 1000 m geothermal scientific borehole from the Xinzhou geothermal field of south China is discussed as a case study to reassess the circulation depth of geothermal water. For Xinzhou geothermal system, the recharge and discharge temperatures are from 26.2 °C to 32.6 °C and from 67.0 °C to 98.0 °C, respectively. And the heat exchange temperature at the deepest point is from 121 ℃ to 154 ℃. This indicates that the temperature gradient in the recharge section should be greater than that in the discharge section. But the actual observation is opposite that the temperature gradient in the recharge section and in the discharge section is 3.04 ℃/100 m and 4.97 ℃/100 m, respectively. We proposed that the depth of geothermal water circulation evaluated by the temperature change and the geothermal heating rate in the discharge section represents the top depth of convection in the heat exchange zone, and the depth evaluated by the recharge section represents the advection depth of groundwater in the recharge section. The top depth of convection in the heat exchange zone estimated by the discharge Sect. (0.75–1.49 km) is much shallower than the advection depth of groundwater in the recharge Sect. (3.25–4.34 km). In the convective heat exchange zone (between 4.34 km and 1.49 km), the fault zone at a certain depth is the ideal location for geothermal development to extract water and heat.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"83 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11853-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11853-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提供地热系统框架的地热水循环深度对更新能力和地热资源的评估起着重要作用。传统的循环深度评估基于补给段的地下水温度变化和地热系统的平均地热加热率。然而,对地热系统中地下水温度分布的误解会导致根据补给断面高估地下水循环深度。本文以中国南方新洲地热田 1000 米地热科学钻孔的温度测量为案例,讨论了如何重新评估地热水的循环深度。新洲地热系统的补给和排放温度分别为 26.2 ℃ 至 32.6 ℃ 和 67.0 ℃ 至 98.0 ℃。最深点的热交换温度为 121 ℃ 至 154 ℃。这表明,补给段的温度梯度应大于排泄段。但实际观测结果恰恰相反,补给段和排泄段的温度梯度分别为 3.04 ℃/100 m 和 4.97 ℃/100 m。我们提出,根据温度变化和地热升温速率评估的排泄段地热水循环深度代表热交换区的对流顶深,而补给段评估的深度代表补给段地下水的平流深度。排泄剖面估算的热交换区对流顶层深度(0.75-1.49 千米)比补给剖面的地下水平流深度(3.25-4.34 千米)浅得多。在对流换热区(4.34 千米至 1.49 千米之间),一定深度的断层带是地热开发提取水和热量的理想位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correction of the circulation depth of geothermal water based on temperature variation in the discharge section of geothermal system

The circulation depth of geothermal water providing the geothermal system framework significantly dominates the evaluation of renewal capacity and geothermal resources. The traditional evaluation of circulation depth is based on the groundwater temperature variation in the recharge section and the average geothermal heating rate of geothermal system. However, misunderstanding groundwater temperature distribution in geothermal systems will lead to overestimating groundwater circulation depth based on the recharge section. Temperature measurement in a 1000 m geothermal scientific borehole from the Xinzhou geothermal field of south China is discussed as a case study to reassess the circulation depth of geothermal water. For Xinzhou geothermal system, the recharge and discharge temperatures are from 26.2 °C to 32.6 °C and from 67.0 °C to 98.0 °C, respectively. And the heat exchange temperature at the deepest point is from 121 ℃ to 154 ℃. This indicates that the temperature gradient in the recharge section should be greater than that in the discharge section. But the actual observation is opposite that the temperature gradient in the recharge section and in the discharge section is 3.04 ℃/100 m and 4.97 ℃/100 m, respectively. We proposed that the depth of geothermal water circulation evaluated by the temperature change and the geothermal heating rate in the discharge section represents the top depth of convection in the heat exchange zone, and the depth evaluated by the recharge section represents the advection depth of groundwater in the recharge section. The top depth of convection in the heat exchange zone estimated by the discharge Sect. (0.75–1.49 km) is much shallower than the advection depth of groundwater in the recharge Sect. (3.25–4.34 km). In the convective heat exchange zone (between 4.34 km and 1.49 km), the fault zone at a certain depth is the ideal location for geothermal development to extract water and heat.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
期刊最新文献
Study on the influence of pipe jacking construction on existing subway tunnels Study on progressive damage and deformation law of coal body around borehole under different moisture states Hydrochemical stratigraphic analysis of the filling of the Meirama open pit mine II: parameters and elements Detection and comprehensive treatment for giant karst caves under the tunnel floor: a case study in Guangxi, China Mineralogical compositions and distributions of trace and rare earth elements in Eocene carbonaceous sediments of Western India: implications for paleoenvironment during peat accumulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1