利用氨基酸去除 Pješivci(黑山)葡萄园中的铜

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1007/s12665-024-11875-w
Vlatko Kastratović, Bojana Knežević
{"title":"利用氨基酸去除 Pješivci(黑山)葡萄园中的铜","authors":"Vlatko Kastratović,&nbsp;Bojana Knežević","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-11875-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Copper compounds in the form of fungicides are most commonly used as a measure of protection against vine diseases. Typically, around a dozen treatments are done throughout a year with a dispersion of approximately 5–10 kg of Cu per hectare. For many years, the remediation of heavy metals has often involved the use of ex-situ soil washing with chelating reagents. Amino acids have a lower metal chelation capability compared to EDTA and its derivatives, but they have numerous other advantages in comparison. The main goal of this research was to investigate the ability of 9 amino acids and one dipeptide to extract Cu from various vineyard soil samples and compare their chelating ability with other ‘green’ chelating agents. The average content of Cu extracted with amino acids is 34.7 ± 16.7 mg/kg or 30.3 ± 5.43 wt% relative to the pseudo-total content. This is more than what was extracted with carboxylic acid salts (9.91 ± 7.49 mg/kg or 8.45 ± 5.56 wt%) but less than with EDTA (98.5 ± 42.7 mg/kg or 79.9 ± 7.12 wt%). The descending order of tested amino acids relative to the removed Cu (mg/kg) is: His &gt; Ser &gt; Thr &gt; Leu &gt; Gly &gt; Val &gt; Phe &gt; Gly-Gly ~ Ala &gt; Arg. The results of this paper show that the amino acid structure is the most important factor for efficient Cu extraction, while the physicochemical properties of the vineyard soil have less impact.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"83 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removal of copper from the vineyard land of Pješivci (Montenegro) using amino acids\",\"authors\":\"Vlatko Kastratović,&nbsp;Bojana Knežević\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-024-11875-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Copper compounds in the form of fungicides are most commonly used as a measure of protection against vine diseases. Typically, around a dozen treatments are done throughout a year with a dispersion of approximately 5–10 kg of Cu per hectare. For many years, the remediation of heavy metals has often involved the use of ex-situ soil washing with chelating reagents. Amino acids have a lower metal chelation capability compared to EDTA and its derivatives, but they have numerous other advantages in comparison. The main goal of this research was to investigate the ability of 9 amino acids and one dipeptide to extract Cu from various vineyard soil samples and compare their chelating ability with other ‘green’ chelating agents. The average content of Cu extracted with amino acids is 34.7 ± 16.7 mg/kg or 30.3 ± 5.43 wt% relative to the pseudo-total content. This is more than what was extracted with carboxylic acid salts (9.91 ± 7.49 mg/kg or 8.45 ± 5.56 wt%) but less than with EDTA (98.5 ± 42.7 mg/kg or 79.9 ± 7.12 wt%). The descending order of tested amino acids relative to the removed Cu (mg/kg) is: His &gt; Ser &gt; Thr &gt; Leu &gt; Gly &gt; Val &gt; Phe &gt; Gly-Gly ~ Ala &gt; Arg. The results of this paper show that the amino acid structure is the most important factor for efficient Cu extraction, while the physicochemical properties of the vineyard soil have less impact.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"83 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11875-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11875-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

杀菌剂形式的铜化合物最常用于预防葡萄树病害。通常情况下,一年中要进行十几次处理,每公顷施用约 5-10 公斤铜。多年来,重金属的修复通常是使用螯合试剂对土壤进行原位清洗。与乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)及其衍生物相比,氨基酸的金属螯合能力较低,但与之相比,氨基酸具有许多其他优点。这项研究的主要目的是调查 9 种氨基酸和 1 种二肽从各种葡萄园土壤样本中提取铜的能力,并比较它们与其他 "绿色 "螯合剂的螯合能力。用氨基酸提取的铜的平均含量为 34.7 ± 16.7 mg/kg,相对于假总含量为 30.3 ± 5.43 wt%。这比用羧酸盐提取的含量(9.91 ± 7.49 mg/kg 或 8.45 ± 5.56 wt%)高,但比用乙二胺四乙酸提取的含量(98.5 ± 42.7 mg/kg 或 79.9 ± 7.12 wt%)低。测试的氨基酸相对于去除的铜(毫克/千克)的降序为His > Ser > Thr > Leu > Gly > Val > Phe > Gly-Gly ~ Ala > Arg。本文的研究结果表明,氨基酸结构是有效提取铜的最重要因素,而葡萄园土壤的理化性质对其影响较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Removal of copper from the vineyard land of Pješivci (Montenegro) using amino acids

Copper compounds in the form of fungicides are most commonly used as a measure of protection against vine diseases. Typically, around a dozen treatments are done throughout a year with a dispersion of approximately 5–10 kg of Cu per hectare. For many years, the remediation of heavy metals has often involved the use of ex-situ soil washing with chelating reagents. Amino acids have a lower metal chelation capability compared to EDTA and its derivatives, but they have numerous other advantages in comparison. The main goal of this research was to investigate the ability of 9 amino acids and one dipeptide to extract Cu from various vineyard soil samples and compare their chelating ability with other ‘green’ chelating agents. The average content of Cu extracted with amino acids is 34.7 ± 16.7 mg/kg or 30.3 ± 5.43 wt% relative to the pseudo-total content. This is more than what was extracted with carboxylic acid salts (9.91 ± 7.49 mg/kg or 8.45 ± 5.56 wt%) but less than with EDTA (98.5 ± 42.7 mg/kg or 79.9 ± 7.12 wt%). The descending order of tested amino acids relative to the removed Cu (mg/kg) is: His > Ser > Thr > Leu > Gly > Val > Phe > Gly-Gly ~ Ala > Arg. The results of this paper show that the amino acid structure is the most important factor for efficient Cu extraction, while the physicochemical properties of the vineyard soil have less impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the performance of machine learning models for predicting soil organic carbon variability across diverse landforms Geostatistical analysis and interpretation of Ilesha aeromagnetic data south–western, Nigeria Application of remote sensing image processing based on artificial intelligence in landscape pattern analysis ResNet50 in remote sensing and agriculture: evaluating image captioning performance for high spectral data Research on microstructure and porosity calculation of rammed soil modified by lime-based materials: the case of rammed earth of pingyao city wall, a world heritage site
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1