{"title":"利用氨基酸去除 Pješivci(黑山)葡萄园中的铜","authors":"Vlatko Kastratović, Bojana Knežević","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-11875-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Copper compounds in the form of fungicides are most commonly used as a measure of protection against vine diseases. Typically, around a dozen treatments are done throughout a year with a dispersion of approximately 5–10 kg of Cu per hectare. For many years, the remediation of heavy metals has often involved the use of ex-situ soil washing with chelating reagents. Amino acids have a lower metal chelation capability compared to EDTA and its derivatives, but they have numerous other advantages in comparison. The main goal of this research was to investigate the ability of 9 amino acids and one dipeptide to extract Cu from various vineyard soil samples and compare their chelating ability with other ‘green’ chelating agents. The average content of Cu extracted with amino acids is 34.7 ± 16.7 mg/kg or 30.3 ± 5.43 wt% relative to the pseudo-total content. This is more than what was extracted with carboxylic acid salts (9.91 ± 7.49 mg/kg or 8.45 ± 5.56 wt%) but less than with EDTA (98.5 ± 42.7 mg/kg or 79.9 ± 7.12 wt%). The descending order of tested amino acids relative to the removed Cu (mg/kg) is: His > Ser > Thr > Leu > Gly > Val > Phe > Gly-Gly ~ Ala > Arg. The results of this paper show that the amino acid structure is the most important factor for efficient Cu extraction, while the physicochemical properties of the vineyard soil have less impact.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"83 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removal of copper from the vineyard land of Pješivci (Montenegro) using amino acids\",\"authors\":\"Vlatko Kastratović, Bojana Knežević\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-024-11875-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Copper compounds in the form of fungicides are most commonly used as a measure of protection against vine diseases. Typically, around a dozen treatments are done throughout a year with a dispersion of approximately 5–10 kg of Cu per hectare. For many years, the remediation of heavy metals has often involved the use of ex-situ soil washing with chelating reagents. Amino acids have a lower metal chelation capability compared to EDTA and its derivatives, but they have numerous other advantages in comparison. The main goal of this research was to investigate the ability of 9 amino acids and one dipeptide to extract Cu from various vineyard soil samples and compare their chelating ability with other ‘green’ chelating agents. The average content of Cu extracted with amino acids is 34.7 ± 16.7 mg/kg or 30.3 ± 5.43 wt% relative to the pseudo-total content. This is more than what was extracted with carboxylic acid salts (9.91 ± 7.49 mg/kg or 8.45 ± 5.56 wt%) but less than with EDTA (98.5 ± 42.7 mg/kg or 79.9 ± 7.12 wt%). The descending order of tested amino acids relative to the removed Cu (mg/kg) is: His > Ser > Thr > Leu > Gly > Val > Phe > Gly-Gly ~ Ala > Arg. The results of this paper show that the amino acid structure is the most important factor for efficient Cu extraction, while the physicochemical properties of the vineyard soil have less impact.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"83 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11875-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11875-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Removal of copper from the vineyard land of Pješivci (Montenegro) using amino acids
Copper compounds in the form of fungicides are most commonly used as a measure of protection against vine diseases. Typically, around a dozen treatments are done throughout a year with a dispersion of approximately 5–10 kg of Cu per hectare. For many years, the remediation of heavy metals has often involved the use of ex-situ soil washing with chelating reagents. Amino acids have a lower metal chelation capability compared to EDTA and its derivatives, but they have numerous other advantages in comparison. The main goal of this research was to investigate the ability of 9 amino acids and one dipeptide to extract Cu from various vineyard soil samples and compare their chelating ability with other ‘green’ chelating agents. The average content of Cu extracted with amino acids is 34.7 ± 16.7 mg/kg or 30.3 ± 5.43 wt% relative to the pseudo-total content. This is more than what was extracted with carboxylic acid salts (9.91 ± 7.49 mg/kg or 8.45 ± 5.56 wt%) but less than with EDTA (98.5 ± 42.7 mg/kg or 79.9 ± 7.12 wt%). The descending order of tested amino acids relative to the removed Cu (mg/kg) is: His > Ser > Thr > Leu > Gly > Val > Phe > Gly-Gly ~ Ala > Arg. The results of this paper show that the amino acid structure is the most important factor for efficient Cu extraction, while the physicochemical properties of the vineyard soil have less impact.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.