{"title":"花岗岩中的高放射性废物处置库在处置单元尺度上的长期地球化学演变的反应迁移模型:变量、敏感性和模型简化","authors":"Javier Samper, Alba Mon, Luis Montenegro","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeochem.2024.106188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The assessment of the long-term performance of the engineered barrier systems of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) repositories requires the use of reactive transport models. Montenegro et al. (2023) presented a non-isothermal reactive transport model of the long-term geochemical evolution of a HLW disposal cell in a granitic host rock corresponding to a generic reference concept. The model accounted for the vitrified waste, the carbon-steel canister, the bentonite buffer and the reference granitic rock. Here we extend their model by considering model variants (V), sensitivity cases (SC) and model abstractions (MA). Variants V1, V2 and V3 consist of considering MX-80 bentonite instead of FEBEX bentonite (V1), a larger groundwater flux through the granite (V2) and the Czech reference crystalline rock as a host rock (V3). Cases SC1 and SC2 consider a decrease of the silica concentration threshold value in the glass dissolution rate (SC1) and an earlier canister failure time (SC2), respectively. Runs MA1 to MA4 consider smectite as an unreactive mineral phase (MA1), the porosity feedback effect on chemical and transport parameters (MA2), a time-varying corrosion rate (MA3), and a coarser finite element grid (MA4), respectively. Model results of V1 show a larger pH, a smaller precipitation of magnetite, siderite and greenalite and a slightly smaller dissolution of ISG and smectite than the base run of Montenegro et al. (2023). Model predictions are very sensitive to the increase in the groundwater flow through the granitic host rock (V2). However, predictions are not sensitive to the chemical composition of the granite porewater (V3). The decrease in the silica saturation threshold from 1·10<sup>−3</sup> to 5·10<sup>−4</sup> mol/L in SC1 leads to a significant decrease in glass dissolution. Glass dissolution after 50,000 years in SC2 (earlier canister failure) is much larger than that of the base run. Model results are not sensitive to considering smectite as an unreactive mineral phase (MA1). However, model results are very sensitive to the porosity feedback effect (MA2). A 60% volume fraction of Fe(s) remains uncorroded after 50,000 years when a variable corrosion rate is considered in MA3. In this case the precipitation of corrosion products is much smaller than that of the base run. The general patterns of the numerical results in MA4 (coarser grid) are similar to those of the base case.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8064,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geochemistry","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 106188"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reactive transport model of the long-term geochemical evolution in a HLW repository in granite at the disposal cell scale: Variants, sensitivities, and model simplifications\",\"authors\":\"Javier Samper, Alba Mon, Luis Montenegro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apgeochem.2024.106188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The assessment of the long-term performance of the engineered barrier systems of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) repositories requires the use of reactive transport models. Montenegro et al. (2023) presented a non-isothermal reactive transport model of the long-term geochemical evolution of a HLW disposal cell in a granitic host rock corresponding to a generic reference concept. The model accounted for the vitrified waste, the carbon-steel canister, the bentonite buffer and the reference granitic rock. Here we extend their model by considering model variants (V), sensitivity cases (SC) and model abstractions (MA). Variants V1, V2 and V3 consist of considering MX-80 bentonite instead of FEBEX bentonite (V1), a larger groundwater flux through the granite (V2) and the Czech reference crystalline rock as a host rock (V3). Cases SC1 and SC2 consider a decrease of the silica concentration threshold value in the glass dissolution rate (SC1) and an earlier canister failure time (SC2), respectively. Runs MA1 to MA4 consider smectite as an unreactive mineral phase (MA1), the porosity feedback effect on chemical and transport parameters (MA2), a time-varying corrosion rate (MA3), and a coarser finite element grid (MA4), respectively. Model results of V1 show a larger pH, a smaller precipitation of magnetite, siderite and greenalite and a slightly smaller dissolution of ISG and smectite than the base run of Montenegro et al. (2023). Model predictions are very sensitive to the increase in the groundwater flow through the granitic host rock (V2). However, predictions are not sensitive to the chemical composition of the granite porewater (V3). The decrease in the silica saturation threshold from 1·10<sup>−3</sup> to 5·10<sup>−4</sup> mol/L in SC1 leads to a significant decrease in glass dissolution. Glass dissolution after 50,000 years in SC2 (earlier canister failure) is much larger than that of the base run. Model results are not sensitive to considering smectite as an unreactive mineral phase (MA1). However, model results are very sensitive to the porosity feedback effect (MA2). A 60% volume fraction of Fe(s) remains uncorroded after 50,000 years when a variable corrosion rate is considered in MA3. In this case the precipitation of corrosion products is much smaller than that of the base run. The general patterns of the numerical results in MA4 (coarser grid) are similar to those of the base case.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Geochemistry\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Geochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883292724002932\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883292724002932","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reactive transport model of the long-term geochemical evolution in a HLW repository in granite at the disposal cell scale: Variants, sensitivities, and model simplifications
The assessment of the long-term performance of the engineered barrier systems of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) repositories requires the use of reactive transport models. Montenegro et al. (2023) presented a non-isothermal reactive transport model of the long-term geochemical evolution of a HLW disposal cell in a granitic host rock corresponding to a generic reference concept. The model accounted for the vitrified waste, the carbon-steel canister, the bentonite buffer and the reference granitic rock. Here we extend their model by considering model variants (V), sensitivity cases (SC) and model abstractions (MA). Variants V1, V2 and V3 consist of considering MX-80 bentonite instead of FEBEX bentonite (V1), a larger groundwater flux through the granite (V2) and the Czech reference crystalline rock as a host rock (V3). Cases SC1 and SC2 consider a decrease of the silica concentration threshold value in the glass dissolution rate (SC1) and an earlier canister failure time (SC2), respectively. Runs MA1 to MA4 consider smectite as an unreactive mineral phase (MA1), the porosity feedback effect on chemical and transport parameters (MA2), a time-varying corrosion rate (MA3), and a coarser finite element grid (MA4), respectively. Model results of V1 show a larger pH, a smaller precipitation of magnetite, siderite and greenalite and a slightly smaller dissolution of ISG and smectite than the base run of Montenegro et al. (2023). Model predictions are very sensitive to the increase in the groundwater flow through the granitic host rock (V2). However, predictions are not sensitive to the chemical composition of the granite porewater (V3). The decrease in the silica saturation threshold from 1·10−3 to 5·10−4 mol/L in SC1 leads to a significant decrease in glass dissolution. Glass dissolution after 50,000 years in SC2 (earlier canister failure) is much larger than that of the base run. Model results are not sensitive to considering smectite as an unreactive mineral phase (MA1). However, model results are very sensitive to the porosity feedback effect (MA2). A 60% volume fraction of Fe(s) remains uncorroded after 50,000 years when a variable corrosion rate is considered in MA3. In this case the precipitation of corrosion products is much smaller than that of the base run. The general patterns of the numerical results in MA4 (coarser grid) are similar to those of the base case.
期刊介绍:
Applied Geochemistry is an international journal devoted to publication of original research papers, rapid research communications and selected review papers in geochemistry and urban geochemistry which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavour, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal and the search for resources. Papers on applications of inorganic, organic and isotope geochemistry and geochemical processes are therefore welcome provided they meet the main criterion. Spatial and temporal monitoring case studies are only of interest to our international readership if they present new ideas of broad application.
Topics covered include: (1) Environmental geochemistry (including natural and anthropogenic aspects, and protection and remediation strategies); (2) Hydrogeochemistry (surface and groundwater); (3) Medical (urban) geochemistry; (4) The search for energy resources (in particular unconventional oil and gas or emerging metal resources); (5) Energy exploitation (in particular geothermal energy and CCS); (6) Upgrading of energy and mineral resources where there is a direct geochemical application; and (7) Waste disposal, including nuclear waste disposal.