Nan Zhang , Yuqin Zhang , Fengcheng Jiao , Chao Liu , Jing Shi , Weijun Gao
{"title":"泉水声对大学生心理生理反应的影响:脑电图研究","authors":"Nan Zhang , Yuqin Zhang , Fengcheng Jiao , Chao Liu , Jing Shi , Weijun Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While the beneficial effects of spring water sound on health are recognized, the specific psychophysiological mechanisms at varying sound pressure levels (SPLs) remain unclear. This study explores the effects of different SPLs of spring water sound on psychophysiological responses, utilizing subjective evaluations alongside electrocardiogram (ECG) and electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring. Thirty-eight college students were exposed to five SPLs of spring water sounds (40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 dBA). Participants underwent subjective evaluation using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and Restoration Outcome Scale (ROS), complemented by physiological measurements through ECG and EEG. Spring water sounds significantly improved psychophysiological health. Psychologically, compared to no sound, POMS scores decreased by 21.60–67.34 %, ROS scores increased by 1.15–1.86 times, and emotional disorders and subjective stress were significantly improved (p < 0.05). Physiologically, the low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio of ECG decreased by 2.30–30.48 % for 40–50 dBA levels, and the overall EEG power for 50–55 dBA levels decreased by 12.72–21.83 %. Significant enhancements in relative power (RP) of α and β (24.21–73.34 % and 23.96–85.26 %, respectively) and a reduction in mental stress (11.23–59.60 %) were observed. The 50 dBA spring water sound notably influenced brain order–disorder balance, showing a 2.01–3.32-fold improvement over other SPLs. A significant physiological inflection point occurred at 1.0 min post-exposure across all measures. Strong correlations were found between ΔPOMS and ΔRP α (r = -0.535, p < 0.01), and between ΔROS and ΔOverall power (r = -0.418, p < 0.001). This study provides a method to comprehensively analyze the positive effects of water sound from both psychological and physiological perspectives and offers a reference for the design of sound environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55506,"journal":{"name":"Applied Acoustics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of spring water sounds on psychophysiological responses in college Students: An EEG study\",\"authors\":\"Nan Zhang , Yuqin Zhang , Fengcheng Jiao , Chao Liu , Jing Shi , Weijun Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While the beneficial effects of spring water sound on health are recognized, the specific psychophysiological mechanisms at varying sound pressure levels (SPLs) remain unclear. This study explores the effects of different SPLs of spring water sound on psychophysiological responses, utilizing subjective evaluations alongside electrocardiogram (ECG) and electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring. Thirty-eight college students were exposed to five SPLs of spring water sounds (40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 dBA). Participants underwent subjective evaluation using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and Restoration Outcome Scale (ROS), complemented by physiological measurements through ECG and EEG. Spring water sounds significantly improved psychophysiological health. Psychologically, compared to no sound, POMS scores decreased by 21.60–67.34 %, ROS scores increased by 1.15–1.86 times, and emotional disorders and subjective stress were significantly improved (p < 0.05). Physiologically, the low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio of ECG decreased by 2.30–30.48 % for 40–50 dBA levels, and the overall EEG power for 50–55 dBA levels decreased by 12.72–21.83 %. Significant enhancements in relative power (RP) of α and β (24.21–73.34 % and 23.96–85.26 %, respectively) and a reduction in mental stress (11.23–59.60 %) were observed. The 50 dBA spring water sound notably influenced brain order–disorder balance, showing a 2.01–3.32-fold improvement over other SPLs. A significant physiological inflection point occurred at 1.0 min post-exposure across all measures. Strong correlations were found between ΔPOMS and ΔRP α (r = -0.535, p < 0.01), and between ΔROS and ΔOverall power (r = -0.418, p < 0.001). This study provides a method to comprehensively analyze the positive effects of water sound from both psychological and physiological perspectives and offers a reference for the design of sound environments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Acoustics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Acoustics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003682X24004699\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Acoustics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003682X24004699","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of spring water sounds on psychophysiological responses in college Students: An EEG study
While the beneficial effects of spring water sound on health are recognized, the specific psychophysiological mechanisms at varying sound pressure levels (SPLs) remain unclear. This study explores the effects of different SPLs of spring water sound on psychophysiological responses, utilizing subjective evaluations alongside electrocardiogram (ECG) and electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring. Thirty-eight college students were exposed to five SPLs of spring water sounds (40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 dBA). Participants underwent subjective evaluation using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and Restoration Outcome Scale (ROS), complemented by physiological measurements through ECG and EEG. Spring water sounds significantly improved psychophysiological health. Psychologically, compared to no sound, POMS scores decreased by 21.60–67.34 %, ROS scores increased by 1.15–1.86 times, and emotional disorders and subjective stress were significantly improved (p < 0.05). Physiologically, the low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio of ECG decreased by 2.30–30.48 % for 40–50 dBA levels, and the overall EEG power for 50–55 dBA levels decreased by 12.72–21.83 %. Significant enhancements in relative power (RP) of α and β (24.21–73.34 % and 23.96–85.26 %, respectively) and a reduction in mental stress (11.23–59.60 %) were observed. The 50 dBA spring water sound notably influenced brain order–disorder balance, showing a 2.01–3.32-fold improvement over other SPLs. A significant physiological inflection point occurred at 1.0 min post-exposure across all measures. Strong correlations were found between ΔPOMS and ΔRP α (r = -0.535, p < 0.01), and between ΔROS and ΔOverall power (r = -0.418, p < 0.001). This study provides a method to comprehensively analyze the positive effects of water sound from both psychological and physiological perspectives and offers a reference for the design of sound environments.
期刊介绍:
Since its launch in 1968, Applied Acoustics has been publishing high quality research papers providing state-of-the-art coverage of research findings for engineers and scientists involved in applications of acoustics in the widest sense.
Applied Acoustics looks not only at recent developments in the understanding of acoustics but also at ways of exploiting that understanding. The Journal aims to encourage the exchange of practical experience through publication and in so doing creates a fund of technological information that can be used for solving related problems. The presentation of information in graphical or tabular form is especially encouraged. If a report of a mathematical development is a necessary part of a paper it is important to ensure that it is there only as an integral part of a practical solution to a problem and is supported by data. Applied Acoustics encourages the exchange of practical experience in the following ways: • Complete Papers • Short Technical Notes • Review Articles; and thereby provides a wealth of technological information that can be used to solve related problems.
Manuscripts that address all fields of applications of acoustics ranging from medicine and NDT to the environment and buildings are welcome.