测定大麻中 Δ9-THC 和相关大麻素的高通量 LC-PDA 方法

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Forensic Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.forc.2024.100610
Walter B. Wilson, Aaron A. Urbas, Haley Jensen, Lane C. Sander
{"title":"测定大麻中 Δ9-THC 和相关大麻素的高通量 LC-PDA 方法","authors":"Walter B. Wilson,&nbsp;Aaron A. Urbas,&nbsp;Haley Jensen,&nbsp;Lane C. Sander","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2024.100610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Before the passage of the <em>Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018</em>, more commonly referred to as the 2018 Farm Bill, forensic laboratories were only required to perform qualitative measurements to confirm the identity of seized plant samples as <em>Cannabis sativa</em> (hemp or marijuana). The new law defines hemp at a federal level as <em>Cannabis sativa</em> containing 0.3 % or less Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC. Because forensic laboratories were not adequately equipped with the proper methods or training to meet these requirements, significant backlogs in casework resulted. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) responded by providing analytical tools to the forensic community. An accurate and precise method was previously developed to determine Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC, Δ<sup>9</sup>-THCA, and total Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC in botanical samples based on liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection (LC-PDA). <em>Cannabis</em> plant samples were ground and extracted with methanol using routine laboratory equipment. The original sample preparation procedure was time-consuming, taking over 70 min. The method described here has been optimized with the time required for sample preparation and LC-PDA analysis has been reduced to less than 30 min.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100610"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-throughput LC-PDA method for determination of Δ9-THC and related cannabinoids in Cannabis sativa\",\"authors\":\"Walter B. Wilson,&nbsp;Aaron A. Urbas,&nbsp;Haley Jensen,&nbsp;Lane C. Sander\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forc.2024.100610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Before the passage of the <em>Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018</em>, more commonly referred to as the 2018 Farm Bill, forensic laboratories were only required to perform qualitative measurements to confirm the identity of seized plant samples as <em>Cannabis sativa</em> (hemp or marijuana). The new law defines hemp at a federal level as <em>Cannabis sativa</em> containing 0.3 % or less Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC. Because forensic laboratories were not adequately equipped with the proper methods or training to meet these requirements, significant backlogs in casework resulted. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) responded by providing analytical tools to the forensic community. An accurate and precise method was previously developed to determine Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC, Δ<sup>9</sup>-THCA, and total Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC in botanical samples based on liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection (LC-PDA). <em>Cannabis</em> plant samples were ground and extracted with methanol using routine laboratory equipment. The original sample preparation procedure was time-consuming, taking over 70 min. The method described here has been optimized with the time required for sample preparation and LC-PDA analysis has been reduced to less than 30 min.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100610\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170924000626\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170924000626","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《2018 年农业改进法案》(通常称为《2018 年农业法案》)通过之前,法医实验室只需进行定性测量,以确认查获的植物样本是否为大麻(Cannabis sativa)。新法律在联邦层面将大麻定义为含有 0.3% 或更少 Δ9-THC 的大麻。由于法医实验室没有充分配备适当的方法或培训来满足这些要求,导致案件工作严重积压。美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)通过向法医界提供分析工具做出了回应。此前已开发出一种准确而精确的方法,基于液相色谱法和光电二极管阵列检测法 (LC-PDA),测定植物样本中的Δ9-THC、Δ9-THCA 和总Δ9-THC。使用常规实验室设备将大麻植物样本研磨并用甲醇提取。最初的样品制备过程耗时超过 70 分钟。本文介绍的方法经过优化,将样品制备和 LC-PDA 分析所需的时间缩短至 30 分钟以内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High-throughput LC-PDA method for determination of Δ9-THC and related cannabinoids in Cannabis sativa
Before the passage of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, more commonly referred to as the 2018 Farm Bill, forensic laboratories were only required to perform qualitative measurements to confirm the identity of seized plant samples as Cannabis sativa (hemp or marijuana). The new law defines hemp at a federal level as Cannabis sativa containing 0.3 % or less Δ9-THC. Because forensic laboratories were not adequately equipped with the proper methods or training to meet these requirements, significant backlogs in casework resulted. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) responded by providing analytical tools to the forensic community. An accurate and precise method was previously developed to determine Δ9-THC, Δ9-THCA, and total Δ9-THC in botanical samples based on liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection (LC-PDA). Cannabis plant samples were ground and extracted with methanol using routine laboratory equipment. The original sample preparation procedure was time-consuming, taking over 70 min. The method described here has been optimized with the time required for sample preparation and LC-PDA analysis has been reduced to less than 30 min.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Chemistry
Forensic Chemistry CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
14.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.
期刊最新文献
Application of element and isotopic fingerprint features in nuclear forensics: A review Outside Front Cover A new “tailor-made” protocol for operational latent fingermarks’ development on unfired ammunition Instrumental color determination of local soils and its variation with elemental profiles Two AIE-actives difluoroboron compounds containing 3,4,5-trifluorophenyl group for latent fingerprints detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1