探索建筑环境中地铁与共享单车之间的复杂关系:竞争、联系与互补

IF 10.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Sustainable Cities and Society Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2024.105870
Yun Yu, Peng Zang, Bingjiang Ye, Xinyan Liao, Ziqi Zhao
{"title":"探索建筑环境中地铁与共享单车之间的复杂关系:竞争、联系与互补","authors":"Yun Yu,&nbsp;Peng Zang,&nbsp;Bingjiang Ye,&nbsp;Xinyan Liao,&nbsp;Ziqi Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2024.105870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Merging the flexibility of bike-sharing systems with the high capacity of metro transit significantly enhances both connectivity and efficiency in urban transportation, promoting eco-friendly travel options and supporting sustainable urban development. Current studies primarily examine how these two transportation modes work together to enhance urban travel efficiency and convenience. However, there is still a lack of discussion on the spatial heterogeneity of the competitive and complementary relationships between two modes across different built environments. This study selects Shenzhen as a case study and employs a data-driven approach to explore the relationships between bike-sharing and the metro system in practical application, including competition, connection, and complementation. The OPGD model is deployed to assess how the built environment influences these dynamics. The results reveal that bike-sharing typically complements the metro system, with longer ride durations occurring mainly in the urban core areas. Conversely, competitive interactions between these two modes are less frequent and associated with shorter rides, typically occurring in locales with a high density of metro stations. Educational, service, and residential factors are the main influences on people's choice of the \"bike-sharing + metro\" travel mode. The built environment exerts a greater impact on competitive relationships and less on complementary ones.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 105870"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the complex relationship between metro and shared bikes in the built environment: competition, connection, and complementation\",\"authors\":\"Yun Yu,&nbsp;Peng Zang,&nbsp;Bingjiang Ye,&nbsp;Xinyan Liao,&nbsp;Ziqi Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scs.2024.105870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Merging the flexibility of bike-sharing systems with the high capacity of metro transit significantly enhances both connectivity and efficiency in urban transportation, promoting eco-friendly travel options and supporting sustainable urban development. Current studies primarily examine how these two transportation modes work together to enhance urban travel efficiency and convenience. However, there is still a lack of discussion on the spatial heterogeneity of the competitive and complementary relationships between two modes across different built environments. This study selects Shenzhen as a case study and employs a data-driven approach to explore the relationships between bike-sharing and the metro system in practical application, including competition, connection, and complementation. The OPGD model is deployed to assess how the built environment influences these dynamics. The results reveal that bike-sharing typically complements the metro system, with longer ride durations occurring mainly in the urban core areas. Conversely, competitive interactions between these two modes are less frequent and associated with shorter rides, typically occurring in locales with a high density of metro stations. Educational, service, and residential factors are the main influences on people's choice of the \\\"bike-sharing + metro\\\" travel mode. The built environment exerts a greater impact on competitive relationships and less on complementary ones.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670724006942\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670724006942","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共享单车系统的灵活性与地铁交通的大容量相结合,大大提高了城市交通的连通性和效率,促进了生态友好型出行方式的选择,支持了城市的可持续发展。目前的研究主要探讨这两种交通方式如何共同提升城市交通的效率和便利性。然而,对于两种交通方式在不同建筑环境中的竞争和互补关系的空间异质性仍缺乏讨论。本研究选取深圳作为案例,采用数据驱动的方法,探讨共享单车与地铁系统在实际应用中的竞争、衔接、互补等关系。采用 OPGD 模型来评估建筑环境如何影响这些动态关系。结果显示,共享单车通常是地铁系统的补充,较长的骑行时间主要发生在城市核心区。相反,这两种交通方式之间的竞争性互动并不频繁,且与较短的骑行时间相关,通常发生在地铁站密集的地方。教育、服务和居住因素是人们选择 "共享单车+地铁 "出行方式的主要影响因素。建筑环境对竞争关系的影响较大,而对互补关系的影响较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the complex relationship between metro and shared bikes in the built environment: competition, connection, and complementation
Merging the flexibility of bike-sharing systems with the high capacity of metro transit significantly enhances both connectivity and efficiency in urban transportation, promoting eco-friendly travel options and supporting sustainable urban development. Current studies primarily examine how these two transportation modes work together to enhance urban travel efficiency and convenience. However, there is still a lack of discussion on the spatial heterogeneity of the competitive and complementary relationships between two modes across different built environments. This study selects Shenzhen as a case study and employs a data-driven approach to explore the relationships between bike-sharing and the metro system in practical application, including competition, connection, and complementation. The OPGD model is deployed to assess how the built environment influences these dynamics. The results reveal that bike-sharing typically complements the metro system, with longer ride durations occurring mainly in the urban core areas. Conversely, competitive interactions between these two modes are less frequent and associated with shorter rides, typically occurring in locales with a high density of metro stations. Educational, service, and residential factors are the main influences on people's choice of the "bike-sharing + metro" travel mode. The built environment exerts a greater impact on competitive relationships and less on complementary ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
期刊最新文献
Improving thermal comfort using personalized local conditioning: A large-scale retrospective questionnaire survey conducted during a heatwave in China Modeling the evolution of community structure by the dynamic network analysis: Sustainability transition in Kyoto Eco-School Districts, Japan Can transportation networks contribute to the sustainable development of urban agglomeration spatial structures? A novel construction and evaluation framework for driving cycle of electric vehicles based on energy consumption and emission analysis The mitigating effect of green Space's spatial and temporal patterns on the urban heat island in the context of urban densification: A case study of Xi'an
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1