美国护理学院协会基于能力的护理教育的基本原则和益处与芬克分类法的比较

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Professional Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.09.008
Pamela B. Dunagan Ph.D., R.N.
{"title":"美国护理学院协会基于能力的护理教育的基本原则和益处与芬克分类法的比较","authors":"Pamela B. Dunagan Ph.D., R.N.","doi":"10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For over a century, Bloom's hierarchical taxonomy has been the gold standard for writing objectives for curricula and courses in programs of nursing. Development of courses and curricula with demonstration of nursing competencies as the outcome requires a more robust taxonomy. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) <em>The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education</em> requires nursing students to meet competencies in assertive leadership, personal development around adapting to ambiguity and change, and professional life-long learning. The purpose of this review was to compare Fink's taxonomy with the AACN basic principles and benefits of competency-based education. In conclusion, Fink's taxonomy of significant learning experiences provides an integrative framework to meet competencies of foundational knowledge, application, and integration of knowledge. Moreover, Fink's taxonomy includes additional areas of learning needed in nursing education such as <em>learning how to learn</em>, leadership and interpersonal skills such as in a <em>human dimension of learning</em>, <em>caring about learning</em>, and the ability to adapt to change. Educators should consider all kinds of learning for nursing practice and should reconsider the use of a hierarchical and content-centered teaching approach, with learning objectives written only at the cognitive level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Nursing","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 140-145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing's basic principles and benefits of competency-based nursing education and Fink's taxonomy\",\"authors\":\"Pamela B. Dunagan Ph.D., R.N.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.09.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>For over a century, Bloom's hierarchical taxonomy has been the gold standard for writing objectives for curricula and courses in programs of nursing. Development of courses and curricula with demonstration of nursing competencies as the outcome requires a more robust taxonomy. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) <em>The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education</em> requires nursing students to meet competencies in assertive leadership, personal development around adapting to ambiguity and change, and professional life-long learning. The purpose of this review was to compare Fink's taxonomy with the AACN basic principles and benefits of competency-based education. In conclusion, Fink's taxonomy of significant learning experiences provides an integrative framework to meet competencies of foundational knowledge, application, and integration of knowledge. Moreover, Fink's taxonomy includes additional areas of learning needed in nursing education such as <em>learning how to learn</em>, leadership and interpersonal skills such as in a <em>human dimension of learning</em>, <em>caring about learning</em>, and the ability to adapt to change. Educators should consider all kinds of learning for nursing practice and should reconsider the use of a hierarchical and content-centered teaching approach, with learning objectives written only at the cognitive level.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Professional Nursing\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 140-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Professional Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722324001571\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722324001571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个多世纪以来,布鲁姆分层分类法一直是编写护理专业课程和课程目标的黄金标准。以展示护理能力为成果的课程和教学大纲的开发需要更强大的分类法。美国护理学院协会(AACN)的《要点》:专业护理教育的核心能力》要求护理专业学生在自信领导、围绕适应模糊性和变化的个人发展以及专业终身学习方面达到能力要求。本次回顾的目的是比较芬克的分类法与 AACN 的基本原则以及能力本位教育的益处。总之,芬克的重要学习经验分类法提供了一个综合框架,以满足基础知识、应用和整合知识的能力要求。此外,芬克的分类法还包括护理教育中所需的其他学习领域,如学习如何学习、领导力和人际交往技能,如学习的人文维度、关心学习和适应变化的能力。教育者应考虑护理实践中的各种学习,并应重新考虑使用分层和以内容为中心的教学方法,仅在认知层面编写学习目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing's basic principles and benefits of competency-based nursing education and Fink's taxonomy
For over a century, Bloom's hierarchical taxonomy has been the gold standard for writing objectives for curricula and courses in programs of nursing. Development of courses and curricula with demonstration of nursing competencies as the outcome requires a more robust taxonomy. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education requires nursing students to meet competencies in assertive leadership, personal development around adapting to ambiguity and change, and professional life-long learning. The purpose of this review was to compare Fink's taxonomy with the AACN basic principles and benefits of competency-based education. In conclusion, Fink's taxonomy of significant learning experiences provides an integrative framework to meet competencies of foundational knowledge, application, and integration of knowledge. Moreover, Fink's taxonomy includes additional areas of learning needed in nursing education such as learning how to learn, leadership and interpersonal skills such as in a human dimension of learning, caring about learning, and the ability to adapt to change. Educators should consider all kinds of learning for nursing practice and should reconsider the use of a hierarchical and content-centered teaching approach, with learning objectives written only at the cognitive level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal will accept articles that focus on baccalaureate and higher degree nursing education, educational research, policy related to education, and education and practice partnerships. Reports of original work, research, reviews, insightful descriptions, and policy papers focusing on baccalaureate and graduate nursing education will be published.
期刊最新文献
Nursing students' personality traits, sleep quality, social media addiction, and academic performance: A multi-site structural equation model analysis Comparing characteristics of underrepresented versus majority student groups enrolled in US nursing programs Using data to drive programmatic change: Recalculating NCLEX-RN success Expanding clinical placement opportunities: Exploring night shift experiences for nursing students Newly graduated and nurse resident competencies: Perceptions of nurse faculty and acute care hospital leaders in the state of Maryland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1