Judith Camps-Lasa , María Isabel García-Domingo , Eric Herrero Fonollosa , María Luisa Galaviz Sosa , María Galofré Recasens , Aurora Rodríguez Campos , Xavier Serra-Aracil , Esteban Cugat Andorrá
{"title":"对接受头十二指肠切除术的术前胆汁引流患者实施有针对性的围手术期抗生素治疗方案的必要性","authors":"Judith Camps-Lasa , María Isabel García-Domingo , Eric Herrero Fonollosa , María Luisa Galaviz Sosa , María Galofré Recasens , Aurora Rodríguez Campos , Xavier Serra-Aracil , Esteban Cugat Andorrá","doi":"10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the bacterobilia in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) based on whether they carry a preoperative biliary drainage or not and to analyse if a targeted perioperative antibiotic treatment based on the expected microbiology leads in no differences in Surgical Site Infections (SSI) between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective observational single-center study of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with preoperative biliary stent (group P, Prosthesis) and without stent (group NP, No Prosthesis). Postoperative complications including SSI and its subtypes were analyzed after applying a targeted perioperative antibiotic treatment protocol with cefotaxime and metronidazole (group NP) and piperacillin-tazobactam (group P).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between January 2014 and December 2021, 127 patients were treated (84 in group NP and 43 in group P). Intraoperative cultures were positive in 16.7% (group NP) vs 76.7% (group P, <em>P</em><<!--> <!-->.01). Microorganisms isolated in group NP included <em>Enterobacterales</em> (10.7%) and <em>Enterococcus</em> spp. (7.1%) with no <em>Candida</em> detected. In group P: <em>Enterobacterales</em> (51.2%), <em>Enterococcus</em> spp. (48.8%), and <em>Candida</em> (16.3%) were higher (<em>P</em><<!--> <!-->.01%). No differences in morbidity and mortality were observed between the groups. SSI rate was 17.8% in group NP and 23.2% in group P (ns).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Bacterobilia differs in patients with biliary drainage, showing a higher presence of <em>Enterobacterales, Enterococcus</em> spp. and <em>Candida</em>. There were no differences in SSI incidence after applying perioperative antibiotic treatment tailored to the expected microorganisms in each group. This raises the need to reconsider conventional surgical prophylaxis in patients with biliary stent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50690,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Necesidad de un protocolo de tratamiento antibiótico perioperatorio dirigido para pacientes con drenaje biliar preoperatorio intervenidos de duodenopancreatectomía cefálica\",\"authors\":\"Judith Camps-Lasa , María Isabel García-Domingo , Eric Herrero Fonollosa , María Luisa Galaviz Sosa , María Galofré Recasens , Aurora Rodríguez Campos , Xavier Serra-Aracil , Esteban Cugat Andorrá\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the bacterobilia in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) based on whether they carry a preoperative biliary drainage or not and to analyse if a targeted perioperative antibiotic treatment based on the expected microbiology leads in no differences in Surgical Site Infections (SSI) between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective observational single-center study of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with preoperative biliary stent (group P, Prosthesis) and without stent (group NP, No Prosthesis). Postoperative complications including SSI and its subtypes were analyzed after applying a targeted perioperative antibiotic treatment protocol with cefotaxime and metronidazole (group NP) and piperacillin-tazobactam (group P).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between January 2014 and December 2021, 127 patients were treated (84 in group NP and 43 in group P). Intraoperative cultures were positive in 16.7% (group NP) vs 76.7% (group P, <em>P</em><<!--> <!-->.01). Microorganisms isolated in group NP included <em>Enterobacterales</em> (10.7%) and <em>Enterococcus</em> spp. (7.1%) with no <em>Candida</em> detected. In group P: <em>Enterobacterales</em> (51.2%), <em>Enterococcus</em> spp. (48.8%), and <em>Candida</em> (16.3%) were higher (<em>P</em><<!--> <!-->.01%). No differences in morbidity and mortality were observed between the groups. SSI rate was 17.8% in group NP and 23.2% in group P (ns).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Bacterobilia differs in patients with biliary drainage, showing a higher presence of <em>Enterobacterales, Enterococcus</em> spp. and <em>Candida</em>. There were no differences in SSI incidence after applying perioperative antibiotic treatment tailored to the expected microorganisms in each group. This raises the need to reconsider conventional surgical prophylaxis in patients with biliary stent.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia Espanola\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia Espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009739X2400201X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009739X2400201X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Necesidad de un protocolo de tratamiento antibiótico perioperatorio dirigido para pacientes con drenaje biliar preoperatorio intervenidos de duodenopancreatectomía cefálica
Purpose
To evaluate the bacterobilia in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) based on whether they carry a preoperative biliary drainage or not and to analyse if a targeted perioperative antibiotic treatment based on the expected microbiology leads in no differences in Surgical Site Infections (SSI) between the groups.
Methods
Retrospective observational single-center study of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with preoperative biliary stent (group P, Prosthesis) and without stent (group NP, No Prosthesis). Postoperative complications including SSI and its subtypes were analyzed after applying a targeted perioperative antibiotic treatment protocol with cefotaxime and metronidazole (group NP) and piperacillin-tazobactam (group P).
Results
Between January 2014 and December 2021, 127 patients were treated (84 in group NP and 43 in group P). Intraoperative cultures were positive in 16.7% (group NP) vs 76.7% (group P, P< .01). Microorganisms isolated in group NP included Enterobacterales (10.7%) and Enterococcus spp. (7.1%) with no Candida detected. In group P: Enterobacterales (51.2%), Enterococcus spp. (48.8%), and Candida (16.3%) were higher (P< .01%). No differences in morbidity and mortality were observed between the groups. SSI rate was 17.8% in group NP and 23.2% in group P (ns).
Conclusion
Bacterobilia differs in patients with biliary drainage, showing a higher presence of Enterobacterales, Enterococcus spp. and Candida. There were no differences in SSI incidence after applying perioperative antibiotic treatment tailored to the expected microorganisms in each group. This raises the need to reconsider conventional surgical prophylaxis in patients with biliary stent.
期刊介绍:
Cirugía Española, an official body of the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons), will consider original articles, reviews, editorials, special articles, scientific letters, letters to the editor, and medical images for publication; all of these will be submitted to an anonymous external peer review process. There is also the possibility of accepting book reviews of recent publications related to General and Digestive Surgery.