{"title":"利用社会脆弱性指数和 abortionfinder.org 来确定社会脆弱性与在空间上获得第二孕期人工流产服务之间的关系","authors":"E Dindinger, RH Cohen, WB Allshouse, J Sheeder","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to assess the relationship between social vulnerability and driving distances from each US county to the closest second trimester abortion clinic as of October 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using AbortionFinder.org, we calculated drive time from the centroid of each US county to the closest second trimester abortion facility. Data was joined to the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) by county FIPS code. Counties were stratified into three SVI tertiles. We compared the median driving distance for states where second trimester abortions were legal vs not-legal. We used logistic regression models to determine the SVI predictors (lowest tertile vs highest tertile) of living in a county with a >2-hour driving distance of a second trimester abortion facility (adjusted for state legality of second trimester abortions).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We assessed 3,143 US counties; 67.1% of counties were within a two-hour drive of a second trimester abortion facility. The median travel time for counties in states with legal second trimester abortion was 1.6 (range:0.1–7.3) vs 4.2 (range:0.9–12.0) hours p<0.001. In logistic regression, counties with the lowest socioeconomic SVI score had increased odds of a >2-hour drive (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.63;95%CI:1.28–2.17) and counties with the lowest racial/ethnic SVI score had increased odds of a >2-hour drive (aOR 1.56;95%CI:1.18–2.04).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Abortion bans disproportionately affect not only those living in restrictive states but also those who are more socially vulnerable. Current legislative and judicial efforts further threaten access to first trimester abortions including medication abortion nationwide. The necessity for second trimester abortions and inequity in access may increase.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 110604"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"USING THE SOCIAL VULNERABILITY INDEX AND ABORTIONFINDER.ORG TO DETERMINE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOCIAL VULNERABILITY AND SPATIAL ACCESS TO SECOND TRIMESTER ABORTION\",\"authors\":\"E Dindinger, RH Cohen, WB Allshouse, J Sheeder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to assess the relationship between social vulnerability and driving distances from each US county to the closest second trimester abortion clinic as of October 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using AbortionFinder.org, we calculated drive time from the centroid of each US county to the closest second trimester abortion facility. Data was joined to the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) by county FIPS code. Counties were stratified into three SVI tertiles. We compared the median driving distance for states where second trimester abortions were legal vs not-legal. We used logistic regression models to determine the SVI predictors (lowest tertile vs highest tertile) of living in a county with a >2-hour driving distance of a second trimester abortion facility (adjusted for state legality of second trimester abortions).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We assessed 3,143 US counties; 67.1% of counties were within a two-hour drive of a second trimester abortion facility. The median travel time for counties in states with legal second trimester abortion was 1.6 (range:0.1–7.3) vs 4.2 (range:0.9–12.0) hours p<0.001. In logistic regression, counties with the lowest socioeconomic SVI score had increased odds of a >2-hour drive (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.63;95%CI:1.28–2.17) and counties with the lowest racial/ethnic SVI score had increased odds of a >2-hour drive (aOR 1.56;95%CI:1.18–2.04).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Abortion bans disproportionately affect not only those living in restrictive states but also those who are more socially vulnerable. Current legislative and judicial efforts further threaten access to first trimester abortions including medication abortion nationwide. The necessity for second trimester abortions and inequity in access may increase.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424002993\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424002993","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标我们旨在评估社会脆弱性与截至 2023 年 10 月从美国各县到最近的第二孕期人工流产诊所的驾车距离之间的关系。方法利用 AbortionFinder.org,我们计算了从美国各县的中心点到最近的第二孕期人工流产设施的驾车时间。数据按县 FIPS 代码与社会脆弱性指数 (SVI) 相结合。各县被分为三个 SVI 分层。我们比较了合法与非法堕胎州的驾车距离中位数。我们使用逻辑回归模型来确定居住在距第二孕期人工流产机构 2 小时车程范围内的县的 SVI 预测因素(最低三分位数与最高三分位数)(根据各州第二孕期人工流产的合法性进行调整)。在第二孕期堕胎合法的州,各县的中位旅行时间为 1.6(范围:0.1-7.3)小时 vs 4.2(范围:0.9-12.0)小时 p<0.001。在逻辑回归中,社会经济 SVI 分数最低的县的 >2 小时车程的几率增加(调整 OR (aOR) 1.63;95%CI:1.28-2.17),种族/族裔 SVI 分数最低的县的 >2 小时车程的几率增加(aOR 1.56;95%CI:1.18-2.04)。目前的立法和司法努力进一步威胁着全国范围内第一孕期堕胎(包括药物流产)的可及性。第二孕期堕胎的必要性和不平等可能会增加。
USING THE SOCIAL VULNERABILITY INDEX AND ABORTIONFINDER.ORG TO DETERMINE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOCIAL VULNERABILITY AND SPATIAL ACCESS TO SECOND TRIMESTER ABORTION
Objectives
We aimed to assess the relationship between social vulnerability and driving distances from each US county to the closest second trimester abortion clinic as of October 2023.
Methods
Using AbortionFinder.org, we calculated drive time from the centroid of each US county to the closest second trimester abortion facility. Data was joined to the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) by county FIPS code. Counties were stratified into three SVI tertiles. We compared the median driving distance for states where second trimester abortions were legal vs not-legal. We used logistic regression models to determine the SVI predictors (lowest tertile vs highest tertile) of living in a county with a >2-hour driving distance of a second trimester abortion facility (adjusted for state legality of second trimester abortions).
Results
We assessed 3,143 US counties; 67.1% of counties were within a two-hour drive of a second trimester abortion facility. The median travel time for counties in states with legal second trimester abortion was 1.6 (range:0.1–7.3) vs 4.2 (range:0.9–12.0) hours p<0.001. In logistic regression, counties with the lowest socioeconomic SVI score had increased odds of a >2-hour drive (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.63;95%CI:1.28–2.17) and counties with the lowest racial/ethnic SVI score had increased odds of a >2-hour drive (aOR 1.56;95%CI:1.18–2.04).
Conclusions
Abortion bans disproportionately affect not only those living in restrictive states but also those who are more socially vulnerable. Current legislative and judicial efforts further threaten access to first trimester abortions including medication abortion nationwide. The necessity for second trimester abortions and inequity in access may increase.
期刊介绍:
Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.