MA Biggs, M Armstrong, L Tucker, S Kaller, J Rabbani, JW Lee, D Grossman
{"title":"大型综合医疗服务系统中寻求和不寻求人工流产者的宫外孕发生率:病例对照研究","authors":"MA Biggs, M Armstrong, L Tucker, S Kaller, J Rabbani, JW Lee, D Grossman","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to compare the incidence of ectopic pregnancy, associated risk factors, and presentation to care among people seeking and not seeking abortion, using a retrospective case-control study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We selected a random sample of 2,201 ectopic and 1,153 intrauterine pregnancies (out of 385,081 pregnancies) of people enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2016-2021. We reviewed electronic health records to classify pregnancies as seeking or not seeking abortion and to obtain medical history. We used logistic regression analyses weighted to the total pregnancy pool (n=385,081) to assess incidence of ectopic pregnancies, associated risk factors, and whether risk factors accurately identify people with ectopic pregnancies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The adjusted incidence of ectopic pregnancy was lower for people seeking abortion (0.39%) than for people not seeking abortion (1.74%, p<0.001). People seeking abortion were less likely to present with bleeding symptoms (53% and 64%, p<0.01), equally likely to present with unilateral pain (35% and 35%) and received more timely care than people not seeking abortion, including fewer encounters until diagnosis (2.2 vs 2.6, p<0.001) and earlier treatment for ectopic pregnancy (53 days gestation vs 55 days, p<0.05). Among people seeking abortion (n=511), history of IUD use, ectopic pregnancy, and tubal surgery, together identified 12.7% (sensitivity) of ectopic cases, with 93.5% specificity, and a 55.5% area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>People seeking abortion are at lower risk of ectopic pregnancy and receive more timely ectopic care than those not seeking abortion. History-based screening in abortion care may not accurately distinguish people with and without ectopic pregnancy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 110623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INCIDENCE OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY AMONG PEOPLE SEEKING AND NOT SEEKING ABORTION IN A LARGE INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE DELIVERY SYSTEM: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY\",\"authors\":\"MA Biggs, M Armstrong, L Tucker, S Kaller, J Rabbani, JW Lee, D Grossman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to compare the incidence of ectopic pregnancy, associated risk factors, and presentation to care among people seeking and not seeking abortion, using a retrospective case-control study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We selected a random sample of 2,201 ectopic and 1,153 intrauterine pregnancies (out of 385,081 pregnancies) of people enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2016-2021. We reviewed electronic health records to classify pregnancies as seeking or not seeking abortion and to obtain medical history. We used logistic regression analyses weighted to the total pregnancy pool (n=385,081) to assess incidence of ectopic pregnancies, associated risk factors, and whether risk factors accurately identify people with ectopic pregnancies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The adjusted incidence of ectopic pregnancy was lower for people seeking abortion (0.39%) than for people not seeking abortion (1.74%, p<0.001). People seeking abortion were less likely to present with bleeding symptoms (53% and 64%, p<0.01), equally likely to present with unilateral pain (35% and 35%) and received more timely care than people not seeking abortion, including fewer encounters until diagnosis (2.2 vs 2.6, p<0.001) and earlier treatment for ectopic pregnancy (53 days gestation vs 55 days, p<0.05). Among people seeking abortion (n=511), history of IUD use, ectopic pregnancy, and tubal surgery, together identified 12.7% (sensitivity) of ectopic cases, with 93.5% specificity, and a 55.5% area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>People seeking abortion are at lower risk of ectopic pregnancy and receive more timely ectopic care than those not seeking abortion. History-based screening in abortion care may not accurately distinguish people with and without ectopic pregnancy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110623\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424003184\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424003184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
INCIDENCE OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY AMONG PEOPLE SEEKING AND NOT SEEKING ABORTION IN A LARGE INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE DELIVERY SYSTEM: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY
Objectives
We aimed to compare the incidence of ectopic pregnancy, associated risk factors, and presentation to care among people seeking and not seeking abortion, using a retrospective case-control study.
Methods
We selected a random sample of 2,201 ectopic and 1,153 intrauterine pregnancies (out of 385,081 pregnancies) of people enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2016-2021. We reviewed electronic health records to classify pregnancies as seeking or not seeking abortion and to obtain medical history. We used logistic regression analyses weighted to the total pregnancy pool (n=385,081) to assess incidence of ectopic pregnancies, associated risk factors, and whether risk factors accurately identify people with ectopic pregnancies.
Results
The adjusted incidence of ectopic pregnancy was lower for people seeking abortion (0.39%) than for people not seeking abortion (1.74%, p<0.001). People seeking abortion were less likely to present with bleeding symptoms (53% and 64%, p<0.01), equally likely to present with unilateral pain (35% and 35%) and received more timely care than people not seeking abortion, including fewer encounters until diagnosis (2.2 vs 2.6, p<0.001) and earlier treatment for ectopic pregnancy (53 days gestation vs 55 days, p<0.05). Among people seeking abortion (n=511), history of IUD use, ectopic pregnancy, and tubal surgery, together identified 12.7% (sensitivity) of ectopic cases, with 93.5% specificity, and a 55.5% area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC).
Conclusions
People seeking abortion are at lower risk of ectopic pregnancy and receive more timely ectopic care than those not seeking abortion. History-based screening in abortion care may not accurately distinguish people with and without ectopic pregnancy.
期刊介绍:
Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.