符合我们价值观的测量:对以人为本的避孕措施进行以人为本的衡量

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Contraception Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110566
J Baayd, C Quade, A Gero, RG Simmons
{"title":"符合我们价值观的测量:对以人为本的避孕措施进行以人为本的衡量","authors":"J Baayd,&nbsp;C Quade,&nbsp;A Gero,&nbsp;RG Simmons","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We conducted a process evaluation of Family Planning Elevated (FPE), a multi-year initiative to improve contraceptive access across Utah by supporting 28 healthcare clinics to deliver person-centered, no-cost contraception. The goal of the process evaluation was to understand not only <em>if</em> FPE was successful, but also <em>how</em> and <em>why</em> it was successful.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our mixed- methods study combined traditional evaluation metrics (client exit surveys, focus groups with participants, service delivery data) with innovative methods designed to measure shifts towards person-centered care (simulated patient visits with clinic sites, regular reflections with FPE staff, and comparisons of providers’ language over time). Qualitative findings were analyzed using a longitudinal analysis approach and mapped onto the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our process evaluation detected a shift in healthcare providers’ perspectives about the goal of contraceptive visits: from a focus on matching patients to the “most effective method” to an understanding of how to support patients in finding their individual “best fit method.” Our data show the primary cause of this shift was the many in-person, tailored trainings and proctoring opportunities offered by FPE. Another important component of FPE’s success was the ability to adapt the intervention to meet the specific needs of each clinic partner.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>FPE was most successful when the intervention adapted to meet the unique needs of healthcare teams and their clients. We learned that supporting clinics in delivering truly person-centered contraceptive care means we must provide clinic staff with programmatic support that is itself person-centered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MEASUREMENT THAT MATCHES OUR VALUES: PERSON-CENTERED MEASUREMENT OF A PERSON-CENTERED CONTRACEPTIVE INITIATIVE\",\"authors\":\"J Baayd,&nbsp;C Quade,&nbsp;A Gero,&nbsp;RG Simmons\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We conducted a process evaluation of Family Planning Elevated (FPE), a multi-year initiative to improve contraceptive access across Utah by supporting 28 healthcare clinics to deliver person-centered, no-cost contraception. The goal of the process evaluation was to understand not only <em>if</em> FPE was successful, but also <em>how</em> and <em>why</em> it was successful.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our mixed- methods study combined traditional evaluation metrics (client exit surveys, focus groups with participants, service delivery data) with innovative methods designed to measure shifts towards person-centered care (simulated patient visits with clinic sites, regular reflections with FPE staff, and comparisons of providers’ language over time). Qualitative findings were analyzed using a longitudinal analysis approach and mapped onto the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our process evaluation detected a shift in healthcare providers’ perspectives about the goal of contraceptive visits: from a focus on matching patients to the “most effective method” to an understanding of how to support patients in finding their individual “best fit method.” Our data show the primary cause of this shift was the many in-person, tailored trainings and proctoring opportunities offered by FPE. Another important component of FPE’s success was the ability to adapt the intervention to meet the specific needs of each clinic partner.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>FPE was most successful when the intervention adapted to meet the unique needs of healthcare teams and their clients. We learned that supporting clinics in delivering truly person-centered contraceptive care means we must provide clinic staff with programmatic support that is itself person-centered.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424002610\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424002610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标我们对 "计划生育提升计划"(FPE)进行了过程评估,该计划为期多年,旨在通过支持 28 家医疗诊所提供以人为本的免费避孕药具,改善犹他州的避孕药具获取情况。我们的混合方法研究结合了传统的评估指标(客户退出调查、与参与者的焦点小组、服务提供数据)和旨在衡量向以人为本的护理转变的创新方法(对诊所进行模拟患者访问、与 FPE 员工进行定期反思以及对提供者的语言进行长期比较)。我们使用纵向分析方法对定性结果进行了分析,并将其映射到实施研究综合框架中,以确定实施的障碍和促进因素。结果我们的过程评估发现,医疗服务提供者对避孕访问目标的看法发生了转变:从关注为患者匹配 "最有效的方法 "转变为了解如何支持患者找到其个人的 "最适合的方法"。我们的数据显示,这种转变的主要原因是 FPE 提供了许多面对面、量身定制的培训和监考机会。FPE 成功的另一个重要因素是能够调整干预措施,以满足每个诊所合作伙伴的具体需求。结论当干预措施能够满足医疗团队及其客户的独特需求时,FPE 是最成功的。我们了解到,支持诊所提供真正以人为本的避孕护理意味着我们必须为诊所员工提供以人为本的项目支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MEASUREMENT THAT MATCHES OUR VALUES: PERSON-CENTERED MEASUREMENT OF A PERSON-CENTERED CONTRACEPTIVE INITIATIVE

Objectives

We conducted a process evaluation of Family Planning Elevated (FPE), a multi-year initiative to improve contraceptive access across Utah by supporting 28 healthcare clinics to deliver person-centered, no-cost contraception. The goal of the process evaluation was to understand not only if FPE was successful, but also how and why it was successful.

Methods

Our mixed- methods study combined traditional evaluation metrics (client exit surveys, focus groups with participants, service delivery data) with innovative methods designed to measure shifts towards person-centered care (simulated patient visits with clinic sites, regular reflections with FPE staff, and comparisons of providers’ language over time). Qualitative findings were analyzed using a longitudinal analysis approach and mapped onto the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation.

Results

Our process evaluation detected a shift in healthcare providers’ perspectives about the goal of contraceptive visits: from a focus on matching patients to the “most effective method” to an understanding of how to support patients in finding their individual “best fit method.” Our data show the primary cause of this shift was the many in-person, tailored trainings and proctoring opportunities offered by FPE. Another important component of FPE’s success was the ability to adapt the intervention to meet the specific needs of each clinic partner.

Conclusions

FPE was most successful when the intervention adapted to meet the unique needs of healthcare teams and their clients. We learned that supporting clinics in delivering truly person-centered contraceptive care means we must provide clinic staff with programmatic support that is itself person-centered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Featured research at the 2024 Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting 2024 IMPROVING CARE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH HIGHER BODY MASS INDEX (BMI) UNDERGOING INDUCTION TERMINATION FULFILLING AN UNMET NEED: PATIENT PERSPECTIVES ON INTEGRATING FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES INTO OFFICE-BASED ADDICTION THERAPY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1