{"title":"传统药物流产患者对用药指导的了解情况","authors":"TX Chen, R Soon, M Tschann","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to evaluate patients’ immediate recall of medication abortion administration instructions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a descriptive analysis of one cohort in a prospective non-inferiority study. We surveyed a convenience sample of medication abortion patients immediately after their appointment in Honolulu, HI between April 2023 and March 2024. Surveys assessed knowledge of medication abortion indications/contraindications, administration, and side effects/precautions, as well as their confidence in correctly completing the regimen. Incidentally, the clinic modified its written instructions for readability approximately halfway through recruitment; we compared outcomes before and after modification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We surveyed 100 patients. Mean age was 27.9 years (SD, 6.6). Thirty-two (32%) had undergone a medication abortion before. On average, patients correctly answered 79% (SD, 18%) of questions about medication abortion indications/contraindications, 97% (SD, 8.3%) of questions about medication regimen administration, and 93% (SD, 11%) of questions about side effects/precautions; the overall average number of correct answers for all questions was 90% (SD, 7.7%). Patients were completely or quite confident they could independently complete the process (n=95, 95%), teach a friend how to complete the process (n=86, 86%), recognize side effects (n=84, 84%), and seek emergency help when needed (n=95, 95%). Patient age, history of medication abortion, and the new medication abortion instructions were not associated with more accurate recall or higher confidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings may be a foundation for future studies that seek to compare the medication abortion knowledge and confidence of patients who pursue medication abortion outside of the clinic setting, such as advance provision or self-managed abortion, with that of traditional patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KNOWLEDGE OF MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION INSTRUCTIONS AMONG TRADITIONAL MEDICATION ABORTION PATIENTS\",\"authors\":\"TX Chen, R Soon, M Tschann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to evaluate patients’ immediate recall of medication abortion administration instructions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a descriptive analysis of one cohort in a prospective non-inferiority study. We surveyed a convenience sample of medication abortion patients immediately after their appointment in Honolulu, HI between April 2023 and March 2024. Surveys assessed knowledge of medication abortion indications/contraindications, administration, and side effects/precautions, as well as their confidence in correctly completing the regimen. Incidentally, the clinic modified its written instructions for readability approximately halfway through recruitment; we compared outcomes before and after modification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We surveyed 100 patients. Mean age was 27.9 years (SD, 6.6). Thirty-two (32%) had undergone a medication abortion before. On average, patients correctly answered 79% (SD, 18%) of questions about medication abortion indications/contraindications, 97% (SD, 8.3%) of questions about medication regimen administration, and 93% (SD, 11%) of questions about side effects/precautions; the overall average number of correct answers for all questions was 90% (SD, 7.7%). Patients were completely or quite confident they could independently complete the process (n=95, 95%), teach a friend how to complete the process (n=86, 86%), recognize side effects (n=84, 84%), and seek emergency help when needed (n=95, 95%). Patient age, history of medication abortion, and the new medication abortion instructions were not associated with more accurate recall or higher confidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings may be a foundation for future studies that seek to compare the medication abortion knowledge and confidence of patients who pursue medication abortion outside of the clinic setting, such as advance provision or self-managed abortion, with that of traditional patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001078242400297X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001078242400297X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
KNOWLEDGE OF MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION INSTRUCTIONS AMONG TRADITIONAL MEDICATION ABORTION PATIENTS
Objectives
We aimed to evaluate patients’ immediate recall of medication abortion administration instructions.
Methods
This is a descriptive analysis of one cohort in a prospective non-inferiority study. We surveyed a convenience sample of medication abortion patients immediately after their appointment in Honolulu, HI between April 2023 and March 2024. Surveys assessed knowledge of medication abortion indications/contraindications, administration, and side effects/precautions, as well as their confidence in correctly completing the regimen. Incidentally, the clinic modified its written instructions for readability approximately halfway through recruitment; we compared outcomes before and after modification.
Results
We surveyed 100 patients. Mean age was 27.9 years (SD, 6.6). Thirty-two (32%) had undergone a medication abortion before. On average, patients correctly answered 79% (SD, 18%) of questions about medication abortion indications/contraindications, 97% (SD, 8.3%) of questions about medication regimen administration, and 93% (SD, 11%) of questions about side effects/precautions; the overall average number of correct answers for all questions was 90% (SD, 7.7%). Patients were completely or quite confident they could independently complete the process (n=95, 95%), teach a friend how to complete the process (n=86, 86%), recognize side effects (n=84, 84%), and seek emergency help when needed (n=95, 95%). Patient age, history of medication abortion, and the new medication abortion instructions were not associated with more accurate recall or higher confidence.
Conclusions
These findings may be a foundation for future studies that seek to compare the medication abortion knowledge and confidence of patients who pursue medication abortion outside of the clinic setting, such as advance provision or self-managed abortion, with that of traditional patients.
期刊介绍:
Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.