评估 NSCLC 疾病负担:基于生存模型的荟萃分析研究

IF 4.4 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Computational and structural biotechnology journal Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.csbj.2024.09.012
Nataliya Kudryashova , Boris Shulgin , Nikolai Katuninks , Victoria Kulesh , Gabriel Helmlinger , Kirill Zhudenkov , Kirill Peskov
{"title":"评估 NSCLC 疾病负担:基于生存模型的荟萃分析研究","authors":"Nataliya Kudryashova ,&nbsp;Boris Shulgin ,&nbsp;Nikolai Katuninks ,&nbsp;Victoria Kulesh ,&nbsp;Gabriel Helmlinger ,&nbsp;Kirill Zhudenkov ,&nbsp;Kirill Peskov","doi":"10.1016/j.csbj.2024.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We present a meta-analytics approach to quantify NSCLC disease burden by integrative survival models. Aggregated survival data from public sources were used to parameterize the models for early as well as advanced NSCLC stages incorporating chemotherapies, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies. Overall survival (OS) was predicted in a heterogeneous patient cohort based on various stratifications and initial conditions. Pharmacoeconomic metrics (life years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained), were evaluated to quantify the benefits of specialized treatments and improved early detection of NSCLC. Simulations showed that the introduction of novel therapies for the advanced NSCLC sub-group increased median survival by 8.1 months (95 % CI: 5.9, 10.0), with corresponding gains of 2.9 months (95 % CI: 2.2, 3.6) in LYG and 1.65 months (95 % CI: 1.2, 2.0) in QALY. Scenarios representing improved detection of early cancer in the whole patient cohort, revealed up to 17.6 (95 % CI: 16.5, 19.0) and 15.7 months (95 % CI: 14.8, 16.6) increase in median survival, with respective gains of 6.2 months (95 % CI: 5.9, 6.4) and 5.2 months (95 % CI: 4.9, 5.4) in LYG and 6.6 months (95 % CI: 6.4, 6.7) and 6.0 months (95 % CI: 5.9, 6.2) in QALY for conventional and optimal treatment. This integrative modeling platform, aimed at characterizing cancer burden, allows to precisely quantify the cumulative benefits of introducing specialized therapies into the treatment schemes and survival prolongation upon early detection of the disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10715,"journal":{"name":"Computational and structural biotechnology journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of NSCLC disease burden: A survival model-based meta-analysis study\",\"authors\":\"Nataliya Kudryashova ,&nbsp;Boris Shulgin ,&nbsp;Nikolai Katuninks ,&nbsp;Victoria Kulesh ,&nbsp;Gabriel Helmlinger ,&nbsp;Kirill Zhudenkov ,&nbsp;Kirill Peskov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csbj.2024.09.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We present a meta-analytics approach to quantify NSCLC disease burden by integrative survival models. Aggregated survival data from public sources were used to parameterize the models for early as well as advanced NSCLC stages incorporating chemotherapies, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies. Overall survival (OS) was predicted in a heterogeneous patient cohort based on various stratifications and initial conditions. Pharmacoeconomic metrics (life years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained), were evaluated to quantify the benefits of specialized treatments and improved early detection of NSCLC. Simulations showed that the introduction of novel therapies for the advanced NSCLC sub-group increased median survival by 8.1 months (95 % CI: 5.9, 10.0), with corresponding gains of 2.9 months (95 % CI: 2.2, 3.6) in LYG and 1.65 months (95 % CI: 1.2, 2.0) in QALY. Scenarios representing improved detection of early cancer in the whole patient cohort, revealed up to 17.6 (95 % CI: 16.5, 19.0) and 15.7 months (95 % CI: 14.8, 16.6) increase in median survival, with respective gains of 6.2 months (95 % CI: 5.9, 6.4) and 5.2 months (95 % CI: 4.9, 5.4) in LYG and 6.6 months (95 % CI: 6.4, 6.7) and 6.0 months (95 % CI: 5.9, 6.2) in QALY for conventional and optimal treatment. This integrative modeling platform, aimed at characterizing cancer burden, allows to precisely quantify the cumulative benefits of introducing specialized therapies into the treatment schemes and survival prolongation upon early detection of the disease.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational and structural biotechnology journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational and structural biotechnology journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037024003003\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational and structural biotechnology journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037024003003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提出了一种元分析方法,通过综合生存模型量化 NSCLC 疾病负担。来自公共资源的综合生存数据被用来为结合化疗、靶向治疗和免疫治疗的早期和晚期 NSCLC 阶段的模型设定参数。根据不同的分层和初始条件,对异质性患者队列的总生存期(OS)进行了预测。对药物经济学指标(获得的生命年数(LYG)和获得的质量调整生命年数(QALY))进行了评估,以量化专业治疗和改善 NSCLC 早期检测的益处。模拟结果表明,对晚期 NSCLC 亚组采用新型疗法可使中位生存期延长 8.1 个月(95 % CI:5.9, 10.0),相应的 LYG 收益为 2.9 个月(95 % CI:2.2, 3.6),QALY 收益为 1.65 个月(95 % CI:1.2, 2.0)。在整个患者队列中提高早期癌症检测率的方案显示,中位生存期分别提高了 17.6 个月(95 % CI:16.5,19.0)和 15.7 个月(95 % CI:14.8,16.6),分别提高了 6.2 个月(95 % CI:2.2,3.6)和 1.65 个月(95 % CI:1.2,2.0)。常规治疗和最佳治疗的 LYG 分别增加 6.2 个月(95 % CI:5.9,6.4)和 5.2 个月(95 % CI:4.9,5.4),QALY 分别增加 6.6 个月(95 % CI:6.4,6.7)和 6.0 个月(95 % CI:5.9,6.2)。该综合建模平台旨在确定癌症负担的特征,可精确量化在治疗方案中引入专门疗法的累积效益,以及在早期发现疾病时延长的生存期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of NSCLC disease burden: A survival model-based meta-analysis study
We present a meta-analytics approach to quantify NSCLC disease burden by integrative survival models. Aggregated survival data from public sources were used to parameterize the models for early as well as advanced NSCLC stages incorporating chemotherapies, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies. Overall survival (OS) was predicted in a heterogeneous patient cohort based on various stratifications and initial conditions. Pharmacoeconomic metrics (life years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained), were evaluated to quantify the benefits of specialized treatments and improved early detection of NSCLC. Simulations showed that the introduction of novel therapies for the advanced NSCLC sub-group increased median survival by 8.1 months (95 % CI: 5.9, 10.0), with corresponding gains of 2.9 months (95 % CI: 2.2, 3.6) in LYG and 1.65 months (95 % CI: 1.2, 2.0) in QALY. Scenarios representing improved detection of early cancer in the whole patient cohort, revealed up to 17.6 (95 % CI: 16.5, 19.0) and 15.7 months (95 % CI: 14.8, 16.6) increase in median survival, with respective gains of 6.2 months (95 % CI: 5.9, 6.4) and 5.2 months (95 % CI: 4.9, 5.4) in LYG and 6.6 months (95 % CI: 6.4, 6.7) and 6.0 months (95 % CI: 5.9, 6.2) in QALY for conventional and optimal treatment. This integrative modeling platform, aimed at characterizing cancer burden, allows to precisely quantify the cumulative benefits of introducing specialized therapies into the treatment schemes and survival prolongation upon early detection of the disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computational and structural biotechnology journal
Computational and structural biotechnology journal Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biophysics
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
540
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (CSBJ) is an online gold open access journal publishing research articles and reviews after full peer review. All articles are published, without barriers to access, immediately upon acceptance. The journal places a strong emphasis on functional and mechanistic understanding of how molecular components in a biological process work together through the application of computational methods. Structural data may provide such insights, but they are not a pre-requisite for publication in the journal. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to: Structure and function of proteins, nucleic acids and other macromolecules Structure and function of multi-component complexes Protein folding, processing and degradation Enzymology Computational and structural studies of plant systems Microbial Informatics Genomics Proteomics Metabolomics Algorithms and Hypothesis in Bioinformatics Mathematical and Theoretical Biology Computational Chemistry and Drug Discovery Microscopy and Molecular Imaging Nanotechnology Systems and Synthetic Biology
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Cryo-EM reveals architectural diversity in active rotavirus particles" [Comput Struct Biotechnol J 31 (17) (2019) 1178-1183]. Spatial domains identification in spatial transcriptomics using modality-aware and subspace-enhanced graph contrastive learning. A systematic review on the state-of-the-art and research gaps regarding inorganic and carbon-based multicomponent and high-aspect ratio nanomaterials EEfinder, a general purpose tool for identification of bacterial and viral endogenized elements in eukaryotic genomes. Using patient-generated health data more efficient and effectively to facilitate the implementation of value-based healthcare in the EU – Innovation report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1