影响软件项目中架构决策过程和挑战的因素:行业调查

IF 1.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Journal of Software-Evolution and Process Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1002/smr.2703
Merve Özdeş Demir, Oumout Chouseinoglou, Ayça Kolukısa Tarhan
{"title":"影响软件项目中架构决策过程和挑战的因素:行业调查","authors":"Merve Özdeş Demir,&nbsp;Oumout Chouseinoglou,&nbsp;Ayça Kolukısa Tarhan","doi":"10.1002/smr.2703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Software architecture plays a fundamental role in overcoming the challenges of the development process of large-scale and complex software systems. The software architecture of a system is the result of an extensive process in which several stakeholders negotiate issues and solutions, and as a result of this negotiation, a series of architectural decisions are made. This survey study aims to determine the experiences of the software industry experts with respect to architectural decision-making, the factors that are effective in decision-making, and the technical and social problems they encounter. An online questionnaire-based survey was conducted with 101 practitioners. The responses were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Analysis of responses revealed that the majority of the participants prefer to document some or all of the architectural decisions taken and to store these documents in web-based collaboration software. Decisions are usually made by teams of two or three, and discussion-based approaches (brainstorming and consensus) are adopted. In the software architecture decision-making process, “major business impact” is the most challenging situation. Information sharing and keeping track of decisions and decision rationale are areas in need of improvement as identified by most participants. From the participants' feedback and their answers to open-ended questions, we concluded that the software architecture decision-making process has an important role in the industry. Our key findings are that decisions made in the architectural decision-making process are taken by teams and generally all decisions are documented. In projects where decisions are made by a single person, peer pressure is found to be significantly different from pressure in projects where decisions are made by the group. This is an indication that as the number of people in the decision-making process increases, the disagreements also increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":48898,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process","volume":"36 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting architectural decision-making process and challenges in software projects: An industrial survey\",\"authors\":\"Merve Özdeş Demir,&nbsp;Oumout Chouseinoglou,&nbsp;Ayça Kolukısa Tarhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/smr.2703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Software architecture plays a fundamental role in overcoming the challenges of the development process of large-scale and complex software systems. The software architecture of a system is the result of an extensive process in which several stakeholders negotiate issues and solutions, and as a result of this negotiation, a series of architectural decisions are made. This survey study aims to determine the experiences of the software industry experts with respect to architectural decision-making, the factors that are effective in decision-making, and the technical and social problems they encounter. An online questionnaire-based survey was conducted with 101 practitioners. The responses were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Analysis of responses revealed that the majority of the participants prefer to document some or all of the architectural decisions taken and to store these documents in web-based collaboration software. Decisions are usually made by teams of two or three, and discussion-based approaches (brainstorming and consensus) are adopted. In the software architecture decision-making process, “major business impact” is the most challenging situation. Information sharing and keeping track of decisions and decision rationale are areas in need of improvement as identified by most participants. From the participants' feedback and their answers to open-ended questions, we concluded that the software architecture decision-making process has an important role in the industry. Our key findings are that decisions made in the architectural decision-making process are taken by teams and generally all decisions are documented. In projects where decisions are made by a single person, peer pressure is found to be significantly different from pressure in projects where decisions are made by the group. This is an indication that as the number of people in the decision-making process increases, the disagreements also increase.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process\",\"volume\":\"36 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smr.2703\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smr.2703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

软件架构在克服大型复杂软件系统开发过程中的挑战方面发挥着根本性的作用。一个系统的软件架构是一个广泛过程的结果,在这个过程中,几个利益相关者就问题和解决方案进行协商,协商的结果是做出一系列架构决策。本调查研究旨在确定软件行业专家在架构决策方面的经验、决策中的有效因素以及他们遇到的技术和社会问题。我们对 101 名从业人员进行了在线问卷调查。对回答进行了定性和定量分析。对答复的分析表明,大多数参与者倾向于记录部分或全部建筑决策,并将这些文件存储在基于网络的协作软件中。决策通常由两人或三人小组做出,并采用基于讨论的方法(头脑风暴和共识)。在软件架构决策过程中,"重大业务影响 "是最具挑战性的情况。信息共享、跟踪决策和决策理由是大多数参与者认为需要改进的地方。从与会者的反馈以及他们对开放式问题的回答中,我们得出结论,软件架构决策过程在行业中具有重要作用。我们的主要发现是,架构决策过程中的决定是由团队做出的,一般来说,所有决定都有文件记录。在由单人做出决策的项目中,同行压力与由小组做出决策的项目中的压力有显著不同。这表明,随着决策过程中人数的增加,分歧也会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors affecting architectural decision-making process and challenges in software projects: An industrial survey

Software architecture plays a fundamental role in overcoming the challenges of the development process of large-scale and complex software systems. The software architecture of a system is the result of an extensive process in which several stakeholders negotiate issues and solutions, and as a result of this negotiation, a series of architectural decisions are made. This survey study aims to determine the experiences of the software industry experts with respect to architectural decision-making, the factors that are effective in decision-making, and the technical and social problems they encounter. An online questionnaire-based survey was conducted with 101 practitioners. The responses were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Analysis of responses revealed that the majority of the participants prefer to document some or all of the architectural decisions taken and to store these documents in web-based collaboration software. Decisions are usually made by teams of two or three, and discussion-based approaches (brainstorming and consensus) are adopted. In the software architecture decision-making process, “major business impact” is the most challenging situation. Information sharing and keeping track of decisions and decision rationale are areas in need of improvement as identified by most participants. From the participants' feedback and their answers to open-ended questions, we concluded that the software architecture decision-making process has an important role in the industry. Our key findings are that decisions made in the architectural decision-making process are taken by teams and generally all decisions are documented. In projects where decisions are made by a single person, peer pressure is found to be significantly different from pressure in projects where decisions are made by the group. This is an indication that as the number of people in the decision-making process increases, the disagreements also increase.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Software-Evolution and Process
Journal of Software-Evolution and Process COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING-
自引率
10.00%
发文量
109
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information A hybrid‐ensemble model for software defect prediction for balanced and imbalanced datasets using AI‐based techniques with feature preservation: SMERKP‐XGB Issue Information LLMs for science: Usage for code generation and data analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1