在一项欧洲试点研究中,通过安全的多方计算对患者数据进行隐私友好型评估

IF 12.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES NPJ Digital Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1038/s41746-024-01293-4
Hendrik Ballhausen, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Dan Bogdanov, Luca Boldrini, Francesco Bono, Christian Goelz, Guillaume Landry, Giulia Panza, Katia Parodi, Riivo Talviste, Huong Elena Tran, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Sebastian Marschner
{"title":"在一项欧洲试点研究中,通过安全的多方计算对患者数据进行隐私友好型评估","authors":"Hendrik Ballhausen, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Dan Bogdanov, Luca Boldrini, Francesco Bono, Christian Goelz, Guillaume Landry, Giulia Panza, Katia Parodi, Riivo Talviste, Huong Elena Tran, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Sebastian Marschner","doi":"10.1038/s41746-024-01293-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In multicentric studies, data sharing between institutions might negatively impact patient privacy or data security. An alternative is federated analysis by secure multiparty computation. This pilot study demonstrates an architecture and implementation addressing both technical challenges and legal difficulties in the particularly demanding setting of clinical research on cancer patients within the strict European regulation on patient privacy and data protection: 24 patients from LMU University Hospital in Munich, Germany, and 24 patients from Policlinico Universitario Fondazione Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy, were treated for adrenal gland metastasis with typically 40 Gy in 3 or 5 fractions of online-adaptive radiotherapy guided by real-time MR. High local control (21% complete remission, 27% partial remission, 40% stable disease) and low toxicity (73% reporting no toxicity) were observed. Median overall survival was 19 months. Federated analysis was found to improve clinical science through privacy-friendly evaluation of patient data in the European health data space.","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01293-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy-friendly evaluation of patient data with secure multiparty computation in a European pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Hendrik Ballhausen, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Dan Bogdanov, Luca Boldrini, Francesco Bono, Christian Goelz, Guillaume Landry, Giulia Panza, Katia Parodi, Riivo Talviste, Huong Elena Tran, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Sebastian Marschner\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41746-024-01293-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In multicentric studies, data sharing between institutions might negatively impact patient privacy or data security. An alternative is federated analysis by secure multiparty computation. This pilot study demonstrates an architecture and implementation addressing both technical challenges and legal difficulties in the particularly demanding setting of clinical research on cancer patients within the strict European regulation on patient privacy and data protection: 24 patients from LMU University Hospital in Munich, Germany, and 24 patients from Policlinico Universitario Fondazione Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy, were treated for adrenal gland metastasis with typically 40 Gy in 3 or 5 fractions of online-adaptive radiotherapy guided by real-time MR. High local control (21% complete remission, 27% partial remission, 40% stable disease) and low toxicity (73% reporting no toxicity) were observed. Median overall survival was 19 months. Federated analysis was found to improve clinical science through privacy-friendly evaluation of patient data in the European health data space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01293-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01293-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01293-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在多中心研究中,机构间的数据共享可能会对患者隐私或数据安全造成负面影响。一种替代方法是通过安全的多方计算进行联合分析。这项试验性研究展示了一种架构和实施方法,它能在严格的欧洲患者隐私和数据保护法规范围内,解决癌症患者临床研究中特别苛刻的技术挑战和法律难题:德国慕尼黑 LMU 大学医院的 24 名患者和意大利罗马 Policlinico Universitario Fondazione Agostino Gemelli 的 24 名患者在实时磁共振的引导下,接受了通常为 40 Gy 分 3 或 5 次的在线自适应放疗,治疗肾上腺转移瘤。结果显示,局部控制率高(21%完全缓解,27%部分缓解,40%病情稳定),毒性低(73%报告无毒性)。中位总生存期为 19 个月。研究发现,通过对欧洲健康数据空间中的患者数据进行隐私友好型评估,联合分析可提高临床科学水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Privacy-friendly evaluation of patient data with secure multiparty computation in a European pilot study
In multicentric studies, data sharing between institutions might negatively impact patient privacy or data security. An alternative is federated analysis by secure multiparty computation. This pilot study demonstrates an architecture and implementation addressing both technical challenges and legal difficulties in the particularly demanding setting of clinical research on cancer patients within the strict European regulation on patient privacy and data protection: 24 patients from LMU University Hospital in Munich, Germany, and 24 patients from Policlinico Universitario Fondazione Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy, were treated for adrenal gland metastasis with typically 40 Gy in 3 or 5 fractions of online-adaptive radiotherapy guided by real-time MR. High local control (21% complete remission, 27% partial remission, 40% stable disease) and low toxicity (73% reporting no toxicity) were observed. Median overall survival was 19 months. Federated analysis was found to improve clinical science through privacy-friendly evaluation of patient data in the European health data space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence awarded two Nobel Prizes for innovations that will shape the future of medicine Spatial resolution enhancement using deep learning improves chest disease diagnosis based on thick slice CT Learning from the EHR to implement AI in healthcare A data-driven framework for identifying patient subgroups on which an AI/machine learning model may underperform Phenotype driven molecular genetic test recommendation for diagnosing pediatric rare disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1