保险状况对多发性硬化症 MRI 表型的影响

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Multiple sclerosis and related disorders Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.msard.2024.105919
Melissa Lynne Martin , Timothy Robert-Fitzgerald , Matthew K. Schindler , Christopher Perrone , Guy Schultz , Selah Lynch , Nebojsa Mirkovic , Sunil Thomas , Ameena Elahi , Donovan Reid , Tyler M. Moore , Erica B. Baller , Theodore D. Satterthwaite , Matthew Cieslak , Sydney Covitz , Azeez Adebimpe , Abigail Manning , Clyde E. Markowitz , John A. Detre , Amit Bar-Or , Russell T. Shinohara
{"title":"保险状况对多发性硬化症 MRI 表型的影响","authors":"Melissa Lynne Martin ,&nbsp;Timothy Robert-Fitzgerald ,&nbsp;Matthew K. Schindler ,&nbsp;Christopher Perrone ,&nbsp;Guy Schultz ,&nbsp;Selah Lynch ,&nbsp;Nebojsa Mirkovic ,&nbsp;Sunil Thomas ,&nbsp;Ameena Elahi ,&nbsp;Donovan Reid ,&nbsp;Tyler M. Moore ,&nbsp;Erica B. Baller ,&nbsp;Theodore D. Satterthwaite ,&nbsp;Matthew Cieslak ,&nbsp;Sydney Covitz ,&nbsp;Azeez Adebimpe ,&nbsp;Abigail Manning ,&nbsp;Clyde E. Markowitz ,&nbsp;John A. Detre ,&nbsp;Amit Bar-Or ,&nbsp;Russell T. Shinohara","doi":"10.1016/j.msard.2024.105919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health insurance in the United States varies in coverage of essential diagnostic tests, therapies, and specialists. Health disparities between privately and publicly insured patients with MS have not been comprehensively assessed. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of public versus private insurance on longitudinal brain outcomes in MS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Lesional, thalamic, and gray and white matter volumes were extracted from longitudinal MRI of 710 MS patients. Baseline volumes and atrophy rates of lesional, thalamic, and gray and white matter volumes were compared across insurance groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After image quality assessment, 376 (284 private / 92 public), 638 (499 / 139), and 331 (250 / 81), patients were in MS lesion, thalamic, gray and white matter analyses respectively. Baseline lesion volume was higher for publicly insured patients but increased at a slightly higher rate in those privately insured (p = 0.01). Baseline gray matter measurements were lower for patients with public insurance, but thalamic (p &lt; 0.01) and gray matter (p &lt; 0.01) atrophy rates were slightly higher in the private insurance group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Insurance type was associated with lesion, thalamic, and gray matter volumes. The results suggest that patients with public insurance may present with more advanced disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18958,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 105919"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of insurance status on MRI phenotypes in MS\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Lynne Martin ,&nbsp;Timothy Robert-Fitzgerald ,&nbsp;Matthew K. Schindler ,&nbsp;Christopher Perrone ,&nbsp;Guy Schultz ,&nbsp;Selah Lynch ,&nbsp;Nebojsa Mirkovic ,&nbsp;Sunil Thomas ,&nbsp;Ameena Elahi ,&nbsp;Donovan Reid ,&nbsp;Tyler M. Moore ,&nbsp;Erica B. Baller ,&nbsp;Theodore D. Satterthwaite ,&nbsp;Matthew Cieslak ,&nbsp;Sydney Covitz ,&nbsp;Azeez Adebimpe ,&nbsp;Abigail Manning ,&nbsp;Clyde E. Markowitz ,&nbsp;John A. Detre ,&nbsp;Amit Bar-Or ,&nbsp;Russell T. Shinohara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.msard.2024.105919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Health insurance in the United States varies in coverage of essential diagnostic tests, therapies, and specialists. Health disparities between privately and publicly insured patients with MS have not been comprehensively assessed. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of public versus private insurance on longitudinal brain outcomes in MS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Lesional, thalamic, and gray and white matter volumes were extracted from longitudinal MRI of 710 MS patients. Baseline volumes and atrophy rates of lesional, thalamic, and gray and white matter volumes were compared across insurance groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After image quality assessment, 376 (284 private / 92 public), 638 (499 / 139), and 331 (250 / 81), patients were in MS lesion, thalamic, gray and white matter analyses respectively. Baseline lesion volume was higher for publicly insured patients but increased at a slightly higher rate in those privately insured (p = 0.01). Baseline gray matter measurements were lower for patients with public insurance, but thalamic (p &lt; 0.01) and gray matter (p &lt; 0.01) atrophy rates were slightly higher in the private insurance group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Insurance type was associated with lesion, thalamic, and gray matter volumes. The results suggest that patients with public insurance may present with more advanced disease.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders\",\"volume\":\"92 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105919\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211034824004954\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211034824004954","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景美国的医疗保险在基本诊断检测、治疗和专科医生的覆盖范围方面存在差异。私人和公共保险的多发性硬化症患者之间的健康差异尚未得到全面评估。本研究的目的是评估公共保险与私人保险对多发性硬化症患者脑部纵向结果的影响。方法从 710 名多发性硬化症患者的纵向核磁共振成像中提取神经节、丘脑、灰质和白质的体积。结果经过图像质量评估后,376 例(284 例私人保险/92 例公共保险)、638 例(499 例/139 例)和 331 例(250 例/81 例)患者分别进行了 MS 病变、丘脑、灰质和白质分析。公共保险患者的基线病变体积较高,但私人保险患者的基线病变体积增加率略高(p = 0.01)。公共保险患者的基线灰质测量值较低,但私人保险组的丘脑(p < 0.01)和灰质(p < 0.01)萎缩率略高于公共保险组。结果表明,公共保险患者的病情可能更严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of insurance status on MRI phenotypes in MS

Background

Health insurance in the United States varies in coverage of essential diagnostic tests, therapies, and specialists. Health disparities between privately and publicly insured patients with MS have not been comprehensively assessed. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of public versus private insurance on longitudinal brain outcomes in MS.

Methods

Lesional, thalamic, and gray and white matter volumes were extracted from longitudinal MRI of 710 MS patients. Baseline volumes and atrophy rates of lesional, thalamic, and gray and white matter volumes were compared across insurance groups.

Results

After image quality assessment, 376 (284 private / 92 public), 638 (499 / 139), and 331 (250 / 81), patients were in MS lesion, thalamic, gray and white matter analyses respectively. Baseline lesion volume was higher for publicly insured patients but increased at a slightly higher rate in those privately insured (p = 0.01). Baseline gray matter measurements were lower for patients with public insurance, but thalamic (p < 0.01) and gray matter (p < 0.01) atrophy rates were slightly higher in the private insurance group.

Conclusion

Insurance type was associated with lesion, thalamic, and gray matter volumes. The results suggest that patients with public insurance may present with more advanced disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
814
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis is an area of ever expanding research and escalating publications. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders is a wide ranging international journal supported by key researchers from all neuroscience domains that focus on MS and associated disease of the central nervous system. The primary aim of this new journal is the rapid publication of high quality original research in the field. Important secondary aims will be timely updates and editorials on important scientific and clinical care advances, controversies in the field, and invited opinion articles from current thought leaders on topical issues. One section of the journal will focus on teaching, written to enhance the practice of community and academic neurologists involved in the care of MS patients. Summaries of key articles written for a lay audience will be provided as an on-line resource. A team of four chief editors is supported by leading section editors who will commission and appraise original and review articles concerning: clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, neuroepidemiology, therapeutics, genetics / transcriptomics, experimental models, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, neuropsychology, neurorehabilitation, measurement scales, teaching, neuroethics and lay communication.
期刊最新文献
Strength training attenuates neuropathic pain by Preventing dendritic Spine dysgenesis through Suppressing Rac1 and inflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis Adaptation, construct validity, and test-retest reliability of the Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire for the Israeli multiple sclerosis population Incorporation of the central vein sign into the McDonald criteria Hypogammaglobulinemia and severe infections in Multiple Sclerosis patients on anti-CD20 agents: A multicentre study Curriculum innovation: Interactive educational workshop improves neurology resident knowledge of multiple sclerosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1