从字节到绿色:供应链数字化对企业绿色创新的影响

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107942
Jing Ma , Qing Li , Qiuyun Zhao , Jennhae Liou , Chen Li
{"title":"从字节到绿色:供应链数字化对企业绿色创新的影响","authors":"Jing Ma ,&nbsp;Qing Li ,&nbsp;Qiuyun Zhao ,&nbsp;Jennhae Liou ,&nbsp;Chen Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A significant share of corporate carbon emissions stems from the supply chain, necessitating an analysis of how supply chain digitalization influences green innovation in the digital age. This paper examines this impact using data from Chinese listed firms (2012−2022). Theoretically, the study posits that supply chain digitalization facilitates green innovation through two primary mechanisms: enhancing upstream and downstream integration and boosting the internal efficiency of supply chain management at nodal enterprises. Empirically, a quasi-natural experiment leveraging the Supply Chain Innovation and Application Pilot Program serves as an exogenous shock. Key findings include: (1) Supply chain digitalization enhances corporate green innovation, with robust results across various tests. (2) The effect is mainly driven by enhanced supply chain integration—more from supplier concentration than customer concentration—and improved internal supply chain management efficiency. (3) The impact has three characteristics: Quality-first Effect, Crowding-in Effect and Persistence Effect. Specifically, supply chain digitalization mainly boosts high-quality green invention patent applications without crowding-out other non-green innovation, while also positively influences sustained green innovation. (4) Supply chain digitalization primarily enhances green innovation in End-of-Pipe and Process Control Technologies, with limited effects on Pollution Prevention at Source.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 107942"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From bytes to green: The impact of supply chain digitization on corporate green innovation\",\"authors\":\"Jing Ma ,&nbsp;Qing Li ,&nbsp;Qiuyun Zhao ,&nbsp;Jennhae Liou ,&nbsp;Chen Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A significant share of corporate carbon emissions stems from the supply chain, necessitating an analysis of how supply chain digitalization influences green innovation in the digital age. This paper examines this impact using data from Chinese listed firms (2012−2022). Theoretically, the study posits that supply chain digitalization facilitates green innovation through two primary mechanisms: enhancing upstream and downstream integration and boosting the internal efficiency of supply chain management at nodal enterprises. Empirically, a quasi-natural experiment leveraging the Supply Chain Innovation and Application Pilot Program serves as an exogenous shock. Key findings include: (1) Supply chain digitalization enhances corporate green innovation, with robust results across various tests. (2) The effect is mainly driven by enhanced supply chain integration—more from supplier concentration than customer concentration—and improved internal supply chain management efficiency. (3) The impact has three characteristics: Quality-first Effect, Crowding-in Effect and Persistence Effect. Specifically, supply chain digitalization mainly boosts high-quality green invention patent applications without crowding-out other non-green innovation, while also positively influences sustained green innovation. (4) Supply chain digitalization primarily enhances green innovation in End-of-Pipe and Process Control Technologies, with limited effects on Pollution Prevention at Source.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107942\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324006509\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324006509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

企业碳排放的很大一部分来自供应链,因此有必要分析供应链数字化如何影响数字时代的绿色创新。本文利用中国上市公司的数据(2012-2022 年)研究了这一影响。理论上,研究认为供应链数字化通过两个主要机制促进绿色创新:加强上下游整合和提高节点企业供应链管理的内部效率。在实证研究中,利用 "供应链创新与应用试点计划 "的准自然实验作为外生冲击。主要结论包括(1) 供应链数字化增强了企业的绿色创新,在各种测试中结果都很稳健。(2)其影响主要来自于供应链整合的加强--更多来自于供应商集中而非客户集中,以及内部供应链管理效率的提高。(3) 影响有三个特征:质量优先效应(Quality-first Effect)、挤入效应(Crowding-in Effect)和持续效应(Persistence Effect)。具体来说,供应链数字化主要促进了高质量的绿色发明专利申请,而不会排挤其他非绿色创新,同时还对持续的绿色创新产生积极影响。(4) 供应链数字化主要促进了末端技术和过程控制技术的绿色创新,对源头污染防治的影响有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From bytes to green: The impact of supply chain digitization on corporate green innovation
A significant share of corporate carbon emissions stems from the supply chain, necessitating an analysis of how supply chain digitalization influences green innovation in the digital age. This paper examines this impact using data from Chinese listed firms (2012−2022). Theoretically, the study posits that supply chain digitalization facilitates green innovation through two primary mechanisms: enhancing upstream and downstream integration and boosting the internal efficiency of supply chain management at nodal enterprises. Empirically, a quasi-natural experiment leveraging the Supply Chain Innovation and Application Pilot Program serves as an exogenous shock. Key findings include: (1) Supply chain digitalization enhances corporate green innovation, with robust results across various tests. (2) The effect is mainly driven by enhanced supply chain integration—more from supplier concentration than customer concentration—and improved internal supply chain management efficiency. (3) The impact has three characteristics: Quality-first Effect, Crowding-in Effect and Persistence Effect. Specifically, supply chain digitalization mainly boosts high-quality green invention patent applications without crowding-out other non-green innovation, while also positively influences sustained green innovation. (4) Supply chain digitalization primarily enhances green innovation in End-of-Pipe and Process Control Technologies, with limited effects on Pollution Prevention at Source.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Zooming in or zooming out: Energy strategy, developmental parity and regional entrepreneurial dynamism How financial derivatives affect energy firms' ESG The performance of renewable-rich wholesale electricity markets with significant energy storage and flexibility Retraction notice to “Geopolitical oil price uncertainty transmission into core inflation: Evidence from two of the biggest global players” Energy Economics Volume 126, October 2023, 106,983. Novel and old news sentiment in commodity futures markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1