优化急诊室护士的分诊教育:范围审查

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106452
Hui Ju Shin , Subin Park , Hyun Joo Lee
{"title":"优化急诊室护士的分诊教育:范围审查","authors":"Hui Ju Shin ,&nbsp;Subin Park ,&nbsp;Hyun Joo Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Accurate triage decisions by emergency room nurses are pivotal for patient prognosis and efficient utilization of resources. This study aimed to identify teaching methods, contents, intervention characteristics, and initial consideration of educational design for the development of triage education, targeting triage nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A scoping review.</div><div>Data sources: PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, and RISS were searched for studies in either English or Korean, regardless of publication year.</div></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><div>The review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Studies published before November 15, 2023 were selected, based on the following index terms in each database: nurses, triage, education, and emergency services, hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 20 studies included in this review, five focused on severity classification of patients with cardiovascular diseases, one addressed infectious diseases, two examined pediatric patients, one explored patients with trauma, and the remaining eleven were not limited to specific diseases. Eleven studies (55 %) employed face-to-face (offline) education, whereas six (30 %) used non-face-to-face (online) education. The teaching methods were classified as teacher-centered learning and student-centered learning. The educational strategies included in-person lectures, online classes, demonstrations, simulations, mobile technology or web-based programs, group discussions, role-plays, and flipped learning. Outcome variables, such as triage accuracy, knowledge, performance ability, self-efficacy, satisfaction, wait time, and competency were measured as intervention effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review demonstrates the key characteristics and contents of triage education interventions, along with key considerations in the initial design stages. Triage education covers a wide range of contents and diverse teaching methods pertinent to severity classification in triage practice. Effective educational programs hinge on the meticulous planning of objectives, optimal selection of the target population, needs assessment, and suitable teaching methods and materials. Future triage education for emergency room nurses should be tailored to specific participants while anticipating and planning all potential circumstances of implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 106452"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing triage education for emergency room nurses: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Hui Ju Shin ,&nbsp;Subin Park ,&nbsp;Hyun Joo Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Accurate triage decisions by emergency room nurses are pivotal for patient prognosis and efficient utilization of resources. This study aimed to identify teaching methods, contents, intervention characteristics, and initial consideration of educational design for the development of triage education, targeting triage nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A scoping review.</div><div>Data sources: PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, and RISS were searched for studies in either English or Korean, regardless of publication year.</div></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><div>The review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Studies published before November 15, 2023 were selected, based on the following index terms in each database: nurses, triage, education, and emergency services, hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 20 studies included in this review, five focused on severity classification of patients with cardiovascular diseases, one addressed infectious diseases, two examined pediatric patients, one explored patients with trauma, and the remaining eleven were not limited to specific diseases. Eleven studies (55 %) employed face-to-face (offline) education, whereas six (30 %) used non-face-to-face (online) education. The teaching methods were classified as teacher-centered learning and student-centered learning. The educational strategies included in-person lectures, online classes, demonstrations, simulations, mobile technology or web-based programs, group discussions, role-plays, and flipped learning. Outcome variables, such as triage accuracy, knowledge, performance ability, self-efficacy, satisfaction, wait time, and competency were measured as intervention effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review demonstrates the key characteristics and contents of triage education interventions, along with key considerations in the initial design stages. Triage education covers a wide range of contents and diverse teaching methods pertinent to severity classification in triage practice. Effective educational programs hinge on the meticulous planning of objectives, optimal selection of the target population, needs assessment, and suitable teaching methods and materials. Future triage education for emergency room nurses should be tailored to specific participants while anticipating and planning all potential circumstances of implementation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"volume\":\"144 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724003629\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724003629","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的急诊室护士准确的分诊决策对患者预后和资源的有效利用至关重要。本研究旨在确定针对分诊护士开展分诊教育的教学方法、内容、干预特点以及对教育设计的初步考虑:资料来源:PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science、Embase 和 RISS,检索英文或韩文研究,不考虑发表年份。根据各数据库中的以下索引词:护士、分诊、教育、急诊服务、医院,筛选出 2023 年 11 月 15 日之前发表的研究。结果在纳入本综述的 20 项研究中,有 5 项侧重于心血管疾病患者的严重程度分类,1 项涉及传染病,2 项研究了儿科患者,1 项探讨了创伤患者,其余 11 项不限于特定疾病。有 11 项研究(55%)采用了面对面(离线)教育,有 6 项研究(30%)采用了非面对面(在线)教育。教学方法分为以教师为中心的学习和以学生为中心的学习。教学策略包括面对面授课、在线课堂、演示、模拟、移动技术或基于网络的程序、小组讨论、角色扮演和翻转学习。分诊准确率、知识、表现能力、自我效能感、满意度、等待时间和能力等结果变量均作为干预效果进行了测量。分诊教育涵盖了与分诊实践中严重程度分类相关的广泛内容和多种教学方法。有效的教育计划取决于目标的精心规划、目标人群的最佳选择、需求评估以及合适的教学方法和材料。未来针对急诊室护士的分诊教育应针对特定参与者量身定制,同时预测和规划所有可能的实施情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing triage education for emergency room nurses: A scoping review

Aims

Accurate triage decisions by emergency room nurses are pivotal for patient prognosis and efficient utilization of resources. This study aimed to identify teaching methods, contents, intervention characteristics, and initial consideration of educational design for the development of triage education, targeting triage nurses.

Design

A scoping review.
Data sources: PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, and RISS were searched for studies in either English or Korean, regardless of publication year.

Review methods

The review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Studies published before November 15, 2023 were selected, based on the following index terms in each database: nurses, triage, education, and emergency services, hospital.

Results

Of the 20 studies included in this review, five focused on severity classification of patients with cardiovascular diseases, one addressed infectious diseases, two examined pediatric patients, one explored patients with trauma, and the remaining eleven were not limited to specific diseases. Eleven studies (55 %) employed face-to-face (offline) education, whereas six (30 %) used non-face-to-face (online) education. The teaching methods were classified as teacher-centered learning and student-centered learning. The educational strategies included in-person lectures, online classes, demonstrations, simulations, mobile technology or web-based programs, group discussions, role-plays, and flipped learning. Outcome variables, such as triage accuracy, knowledge, performance ability, self-efficacy, satisfaction, wait time, and competency were measured as intervention effects.

Conclusions

This review demonstrates the key characteristics and contents of triage education interventions, along with key considerations in the initial design stages. Triage education covers a wide range of contents and diverse teaching methods pertinent to severity classification in triage practice. Effective educational programs hinge on the meticulous planning of objectives, optimal selection of the target population, needs assessment, and suitable teaching methods and materials. Future triage education for emergency room nurses should be tailored to specific participants while anticipating and planning all potential circumstances of implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
The critical role of education in shaping nurses' attitudes and intentions towards neonatal palliative care: A network analysis Editorial Board Barriers and facilitators to the application of nurse practitioners' training pilot programs in China: A CFIR-guided descriptive qualitative study International nursing students' culture shock and academic engagement: The moderating role of resilience Factors influencing patient safety competency in baccalaureate nursing students: A descriptive cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1