利用自动图像分析和机器学习算法建立三维喷墨材料打印机的预测模型

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Manufacturing Letters Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.09.101
Mutha Nandipati, Michael Ogunsanya, Salil Desai
{"title":"利用自动图像分析和机器学习算法建立三维喷墨材料打印机的预测模型","authors":"Mutha Nandipati,&nbsp;Michael Ogunsanya,&nbsp;Salil Desai","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.09.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Additive manufacturing (AM) is a smart manufacturing process to fabricate components with high precision, minimal post-processing, and increased component complexity in a variety of materials. This research focuses on developing automated image analysis and predictive models for a widely used 3D material inkjet printing (IJP) process. The interplay of four input process parameters, which include frequency, voltage, temperature, and meniscus vacuum, on the output metrics of the inkjet printer was evaluated using statistical measures (ANOVA). Droplet types were classified as no drop, satellite drop, and normal drop using four machine learning classifiers, including random forest, support vector classifier, k-nearest neighbor, and decision trees. Hyperparameter tuning was performed for each model for over 486 data points. Regression predictive models were developed for both ink droplet velocity and volume with three linear models (linear, lasso, and ridge regression) and four non-linear models (random forest, decision tree, support vector regression, and k-nearest neighbor). Mean squared error and the coefficient of determination, r-squared value, were used to evaluate the performance of the predictive models. For the drop type classification models, k-fold of 5 yielded the highest accuracy for the RF, KNN, and DT models of around 98%. Similarly, for the regression based predictive models RF, DT and KNN accuracy results ranged from 97 to 99%. All the machine learning models were validated with experimental data with high prediction accuracies accuracy. This research serves as a foundation for developing design guidelines for 3D material inkjet printing with applications in biosensors, flexible electronics, and regenerative tissue engineering.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38186,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Letters","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 810-821"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive models for 3D inkjet material printer using automated image analysis and machine learning algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Mutha Nandipati,&nbsp;Michael Ogunsanya,&nbsp;Salil Desai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.09.101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Additive manufacturing (AM) is a smart manufacturing process to fabricate components with high precision, minimal post-processing, and increased component complexity in a variety of materials. This research focuses on developing automated image analysis and predictive models for a widely used 3D material inkjet printing (IJP) process. The interplay of four input process parameters, which include frequency, voltage, temperature, and meniscus vacuum, on the output metrics of the inkjet printer was evaluated using statistical measures (ANOVA). Droplet types were classified as no drop, satellite drop, and normal drop using four machine learning classifiers, including random forest, support vector classifier, k-nearest neighbor, and decision trees. Hyperparameter tuning was performed for each model for over 486 data points. Regression predictive models were developed for both ink droplet velocity and volume with three linear models (linear, lasso, and ridge regression) and four non-linear models (random forest, decision tree, support vector regression, and k-nearest neighbor). Mean squared error and the coefficient of determination, r-squared value, were used to evaluate the performance of the predictive models. For the drop type classification models, k-fold of 5 yielded the highest accuracy for the RF, KNN, and DT models of around 98%. Similarly, for the regression based predictive models RF, DT and KNN accuracy results ranged from 97 to 99%. All the machine learning models were validated with experimental data with high prediction accuracies accuracy. This research serves as a foundation for developing design guidelines for 3D material inkjet printing with applications in biosensors, flexible electronics, and regenerative tissue engineering.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manufacturing Letters\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 810-821\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manufacturing Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846324001640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846324001640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速成型制造(AM)是一种智能制造工艺,可利用各种材料制造出精度高、后处理最少、部件复杂度更高的部件。本研究的重点是为广泛使用的三维材料喷墨打印(IJP)工艺开发自动图像分析和预测模型。使用统计方法(方差分析)评估了四个输入工艺参数(包括频率、电压、温度和半月板真空度)对喷墨打印机输出指标的相互影响。使用四种机器学习分类器(包括随机森林、支持向量分类器、k-近邻和决策树)将液滴类型分为无液滴、卫星液滴和正常液滴。每个模型都对超过 486 个数据点进行了超参数调整。利用三个线性模型(线性、套索和脊回归)和四个非线性模型(随机森林、决策树、支持向量回归和 k 最近邻),为墨滴速度和体积开发了回归预测模型。平均平方误差和判定系数 r 平方值用于评估预测模型的性能。在水滴类型分类模型中,k-fold 为 5 时,RF、KNN 和 DT 模型的准确率最高,约为 98%。同样,对于基于回归的预测模型,RF、DT 和 KNN 的准确率在 97% 到 99% 之间。所有机器学习模型都通过实验数据进行了验证,预测准确率较高。这项研究为制定三维材料喷墨打印设计指南奠定了基础,可应用于生物传感器、柔性电子器件和再生组织工程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictive models for 3D inkjet material printer using automated image analysis and machine learning algorithms
Additive manufacturing (AM) is a smart manufacturing process to fabricate components with high precision, minimal post-processing, and increased component complexity in a variety of materials. This research focuses on developing automated image analysis and predictive models for a widely used 3D material inkjet printing (IJP) process. The interplay of four input process parameters, which include frequency, voltage, temperature, and meniscus vacuum, on the output metrics of the inkjet printer was evaluated using statistical measures (ANOVA). Droplet types were classified as no drop, satellite drop, and normal drop using four machine learning classifiers, including random forest, support vector classifier, k-nearest neighbor, and decision trees. Hyperparameter tuning was performed for each model for over 486 data points. Regression predictive models were developed for both ink droplet velocity and volume with three linear models (linear, lasso, and ridge regression) and four non-linear models (random forest, decision tree, support vector regression, and k-nearest neighbor). Mean squared error and the coefficient of determination, r-squared value, were used to evaluate the performance of the predictive models. For the drop type classification models, k-fold of 5 yielded the highest accuracy for the RF, KNN, and DT models of around 98%. Similarly, for the regression based predictive models RF, DT and KNN accuracy results ranged from 97 to 99%. All the machine learning models were validated with experimental data with high prediction accuracies accuracy. This research serves as a foundation for developing design guidelines for 3D material inkjet printing with applications in biosensors, flexible electronics, and regenerative tissue engineering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Manufacturing Letters
Manufacturing Letters Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
Applicability of circularity protocols to extend the lifetime of a thermoplastic pultrusion line: A case study Feasibility study of using friction stir extruded recycled aluminum rods for welding and additive manufacturing Scalable and efficient fabrication of surface microstructures using a small wheeled robot with a vibration-cutting tool Influence of parameter variation and interlayer temperature control in wall angle, curvature and measurement methodology of ER70S-6 parts obtained by WAAM Hard and wear resistant AISI304 stainless steel clad layer deposited on mild steel substrate by TIG cladding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1