材料和工艺参数对不锈钢机加工性能的影响

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Manufacturing Letters Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.09.088
Iqbal Shareef , Durga Kumar Raja Potluri , Gerry Horton
{"title":"材料和工艺参数对不锈钢机加工性能的影响","authors":"Iqbal Shareef ,&nbsp;Durga Kumar Raja Potluri ,&nbsp;Gerry Horton","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.09.088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Stainless steels, recognized for their corrosion resistance attributed to a minimum of 11 % Chromium, encompass a variety of alloys with distinctive microstructures and properties. Machinability significantly varies among these alloys. Austenitic steels such as SS303 and 304 present challenges, demonstrating poor surface finish and high power consumption. This study, employing a central composite design, investigates the machinability of AISI 303, 304, 316, AISI 416, and AISI A36. Turning tests with PVD TiAlN-coated inserts revealed optimal parameters for cutting speeds (90.5256–244.411 m/min), feed (0.0635–0.4826 mm/rev), and depth (0.00016–0.00187 m.). Surface finish analysis identified AISI 316 as the best, closely followed by AISI 303. From a power consumption standpoint, AISI 303 performed the best, and concerning fragmented chip morphology, AISI 303 also excelled. The superior performance of AISI 303 is attributed to 2 % Manganese and 0.15 % Sulfur, proving to be the most effective combination compared to the other four steels, resulting in a higher percentage of MnS<sub>2</sub>, optimal for improving machinability. The depth of cut emerges as the most influential factor affecting dimensional accuracy. These findings hold practical significance in the selection of stainless steels and corresponding process parameters across various industries, including the manufacturing of heavy earthmoving equipment. By shedding light on the optimal composition and machining conditions, this study contributes valuable insights for enhancing performance and efficiency in stainless steel applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38186,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Letters","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 696-707"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of materials and process parameters on machinability of stainless steels\",\"authors\":\"Iqbal Shareef ,&nbsp;Durga Kumar Raja Potluri ,&nbsp;Gerry Horton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.09.088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Stainless steels, recognized for their corrosion resistance attributed to a minimum of 11 % Chromium, encompass a variety of alloys with distinctive microstructures and properties. Machinability significantly varies among these alloys. Austenitic steels such as SS303 and 304 present challenges, demonstrating poor surface finish and high power consumption. This study, employing a central composite design, investigates the machinability of AISI 303, 304, 316, AISI 416, and AISI A36. Turning tests with PVD TiAlN-coated inserts revealed optimal parameters for cutting speeds (90.5256–244.411 m/min), feed (0.0635–0.4826 mm/rev), and depth (0.00016–0.00187 m.). Surface finish analysis identified AISI 316 as the best, closely followed by AISI 303. From a power consumption standpoint, AISI 303 performed the best, and concerning fragmented chip morphology, AISI 303 also excelled. The superior performance of AISI 303 is attributed to 2 % Manganese and 0.15 % Sulfur, proving to be the most effective combination compared to the other four steels, resulting in a higher percentage of MnS<sub>2</sub>, optimal for improving machinability. The depth of cut emerges as the most influential factor affecting dimensional accuracy. These findings hold practical significance in the selection of stainless steels and corresponding process parameters across various industries, including the manufacturing of heavy earthmoving equipment. By shedding light on the optimal composition and machining conditions, this study contributes valuable insights for enhancing performance and efficiency in stainless steel applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manufacturing Letters\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 696-707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manufacturing Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846324001512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846324001512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不锈钢因至少含有 11% 的铬而被公认为具有耐腐蚀性,它包括各种具有独特微观结构和性能的合金。这些合金的机加工性能差异很大。奥氏体钢(如 SS303 和 304)面临的挑战是表面光洁度差、功耗高。本研究采用中心复合设计,调查了 AISI 303、304、316、AISI 416 和 AISI A36 的机加工性能。使用 PVD TiAlN 涂层刀片进行的车削测试显示了切削速度(90.5256-244.411 米/分钟)、进给量(0.0635-0.4826 毫米/转)和深度(0.00016-0.00187 米)的最佳参数。表面光洁度分析表明,AISI 316 的光洁度最好,紧随其后的是 AISI 303。从功耗的角度来看,AISI 303 的性能最佳,而在碎屑形态方面,AISI 303 也表现出色。AISI 303 的优异性能归功于 2% 的锰和 0.15% 的硫,与其他四种钢材相比,这是最有效的组合,从而产生了更高比例的 MnS2,是提高加工性能的最佳选择。切削深度是影响尺寸精度的最大因素。这些发现对各行各业(包括重型推土设备制造行业)选择不锈钢和相应的工艺参数具有实际意义。通过阐明最佳成分和加工条件,这项研究为提高不锈钢应用的性能和效率提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of materials and process parameters on machinability of stainless steels
Stainless steels, recognized for their corrosion resistance attributed to a minimum of 11 % Chromium, encompass a variety of alloys with distinctive microstructures and properties. Machinability significantly varies among these alloys. Austenitic steels such as SS303 and 304 present challenges, demonstrating poor surface finish and high power consumption. This study, employing a central composite design, investigates the machinability of AISI 303, 304, 316, AISI 416, and AISI A36. Turning tests with PVD TiAlN-coated inserts revealed optimal parameters for cutting speeds (90.5256–244.411 m/min), feed (0.0635–0.4826 mm/rev), and depth (0.00016–0.00187 m.). Surface finish analysis identified AISI 316 as the best, closely followed by AISI 303. From a power consumption standpoint, AISI 303 performed the best, and concerning fragmented chip morphology, AISI 303 also excelled. The superior performance of AISI 303 is attributed to 2 % Manganese and 0.15 % Sulfur, proving to be the most effective combination compared to the other four steels, resulting in a higher percentage of MnS2, optimal for improving machinability. The depth of cut emerges as the most influential factor affecting dimensional accuracy. These findings hold practical significance in the selection of stainless steels and corresponding process parameters across various industries, including the manufacturing of heavy earthmoving equipment. By shedding light on the optimal composition and machining conditions, this study contributes valuable insights for enhancing performance and efficiency in stainless steel applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Manufacturing Letters
Manufacturing Letters Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
Applicability of circularity protocols to extend the lifetime of a thermoplastic pultrusion line: A case study Feasibility study of using friction stir extruded recycled aluminum rods for welding and additive manufacturing Scalable and efficient fabrication of surface microstructures using a small wheeled robot with a vibration-cutting tool Influence of parameter variation and interlayer temperature control in wall angle, curvature and measurement methodology of ER70S-6 parts obtained by WAAM Hard and wear resistant AISI304 stainless steel clad layer deposited on mild steel substrate by TIG cladding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1