Mandar Shinde, Irving E. Ramirez-Chavez, Alexander Potts, Dhruv Bhate
{"title":"在评估增材制造蜂窝材料的能量吸收时对致密化起始应变进行严格评估","authors":"Mandar Shinde, Irving E. Ramirez-Chavez, Alexander Potts, Dhruv Bhate","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.09.089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Densification strain is an essential parameter in the characterization of energy absorption of additively manufactured cellular structures. In addition to its own merits as a metric that indicates usable stroke length for energy absorbers, it is central to the computation of energy absorbed by the structure. However, at least four different approaches have been used in the literature, each with its own limitations. In this work, a critical review of these approaches is first presented. While the maximum efficiency approach has been demonstrated to be optimal for cellular foams, this work shows how, for some additively manufactured cellular materials, it can fail to estimate densification strain accurately due to its sensitivity to instantaneous stress values in the plateau region. An alternative method is proposed in this work that leverages peak stress instead to determine the onset strain of densification and is shown to be consistently accurate across a range of cellular materials. The method is validated with the results from an experimental study of energy absorption in six different types of cellular structures across three relative densities, with identical geometries fabricated in two different base materials and processes: AlSi10Mg with Laser Powder Bed Fusion, and Nylon-12 with Selective Laser Sintering.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38186,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Letters","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 708-719"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical assessment of the onset strain of densification in the evaluation of energy absorption for additively manufactured cellular materials\",\"authors\":\"Mandar Shinde, Irving E. Ramirez-Chavez, Alexander Potts, Dhruv Bhate\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mfglet.2024.09.089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Densification strain is an essential parameter in the characterization of energy absorption of additively manufactured cellular structures. In addition to its own merits as a metric that indicates usable stroke length for energy absorbers, it is central to the computation of energy absorbed by the structure. However, at least four different approaches have been used in the literature, each with its own limitations. In this work, a critical review of these approaches is first presented. While the maximum efficiency approach has been demonstrated to be optimal for cellular foams, this work shows how, for some additively manufactured cellular materials, it can fail to estimate densification strain accurately due to its sensitivity to instantaneous stress values in the plateau region. An alternative method is proposed in this work that leverages peak stress instead to determine the onset strain of densification and is shown to be consistently accurate across a range of cellular materials. The method is validated with the results from an experimental study of energy absorption in six different types of cellular structures across three relative densities, with identical geometries fabricated in two different base materials and processes: AlSi10Mg with Laser Powder Bed Fusion, and Nylon-12 with Selective Laser Sintering.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manufacturing Letters\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 708-719\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manufacturing Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846324001524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846324001524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
A critical assessment of the onset strain of densification in the evaluation of energy absorption for additively manufactured cellular materials
Densification strain is an essential parameter in the characterization of energy absorption of additively manufactured cellular structures. In addition to its own merits as a metric that indicates usable stroke length for energy absorbers, it is central to the computation of energy absorbed by the structure. However, at least four different approaches have been used in the literature, each with its own limitations. In this work, a critical review of these approaches is first presented. While the maximum efficiency approach has been demonstrated to be optimal for cellular foams, this work shows how, for some additively manufactured cellular materials, it can fail to estimate densification strain accurately due to its sensitivity to instantaneous stress values in the plateau region. An alternative method is proposed in this work that leverages peak stress instead to determine the onset strain of densification and is shown to be consistently accurate across a range of cellular materials. The method is validated with the results from an experimental study of energy absorption in six different types of cellular structures across three relative densities, with identical geometries fabricated in two different base materials and processes: AlSi10Mg with Laser Powder Bed Fusion, and Nylon-12 with Selective Laser Sintering.