实解析映射的不稳定性问题

IF 0.8 3区数学 Q2 MATHEMATICS Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1112/blms.13124

Karim Bekka, Satoshi Koike, Toru Ohmoto, Masahiro Shiota, Masato Tanabe

{"title":"实解析映射的不稳定性问题","authors":"Karim Bekka, Satoshi Koike, Toru Ohmoto, Masahiro Shiota, Masato Tanabe","doi":"10.1112/blms.13124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As well known, the <math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>C</mi>\n <mi>∞</mi>\n </msup>\n <annotation>$C^\\infty$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> stability of proper <math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>C</mi>\n <mi>∞</mi>\n </msup>\n <annotation>$C^\\infty$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> maps is characterized by the infinitesimal <math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>C</mi>\n <mi>∞</mi>\n </msup>\n <annotation>$C^\\infty$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> stability. In the present paper, we study the counterpart in real analytic context. In particular, we show that the infinitesimal <math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>C</mi>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n </msup>\n <annotation>$C^\\omega$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> stability does not imply <math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>C</mi>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n </msup>\n <annotation>$C^\\omega$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> stability; for instance, a Whitney umbrella <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msup>\n <mo>→</mo>\n <msup>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mn>3</mn>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathbb {R}^2 \\rightarrow \\mathbb {R}^3$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is not <math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>C</mi>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n </msup>\n <annotation>$C^\\omega$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> stable. A main tool for the proof is a relative version of Whitney's analytic approximation theorem that is shown by using H. Cartan's Theorems A and B.","PeriodicalId":55298,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society","volume":"56 10","pages":"3174-3180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unstability problem of real analytic maps\",\"authors\":\"Karim Bekka, Satoshi Koike, Toru Ohmoto, Masahiro Shiota, Masato Tanabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1112/blms.13124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As well known, the <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>C</mi>\\n <mi>∞</mi>\\n </msup>\\n <annotation>$C^\\\\infty$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> stability of proper <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>C</mi>\\n <mi>∞</mi>\\n </msup>\\n <annotation>$C^\\\\infty$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> maps is characterized by the infinitesimal <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>C</mi>\\n <mi>∞</mi>\\n </msup>\\n <annotation>$C^\\\\infty$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> stability. In the present paper, we study the counterpart in real analytic context. In particular, we show that the infinitesimal <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>C</mi>\\n <mi>ω</mi>\\n </msup>\\n <annotation>$C^\\\\omega$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> stability does not imply <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>C</mi>\\n <mi>ω</mi>\\n </msup>\\n <annotation>$C^\\\\omega$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> stability; for instance, a Whitney umbrella <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msup>\\n <mo>→</mo>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <mn>3</mn>\\n </msup>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\mathbb {R}^2 \\\\rightarrow \\\\mathbb {R}^3$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> is not <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>C</mi>\\n <mi>ω</mi>\\n </msup>\\n <annotation>$C^\\\\omega$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> stable. A main tool for the proof is a relative version of Whitney's analytic approximation theorem that is shown by using H. Cartan's Theorems A and B.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society\",\"volume\":\"56 10\",\"pages\":\"3174-3180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1112/blms.13124\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1112/blms.13124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知，适当 C ∞ $C^infty$ 映射的 C ∞ $C^infty$ 稳定性是以无穷小 C ∞ $C^infty$ 稳定性为特征的。在本文中，我们研究了实解析背景下的对应关系。特别是，我们证明了无穷小 C ω $C^\omega$ 稳定性并不意味着 C ω $C^\omega$ 稳定性；例如，惠特尼伞 R 2 → R 3 $\mathbb {R}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {R}^3$ 不是 C ω $C^\omega$ 稳定性。证明的一个主要工具是惠特尼解析近似定理的一个相对版本，它是通过 H. Cartan 的定理 A 和 B 来证明的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Unstability problem of real analytic maps

As well known, the $C^{\infty}$ stability of proper $C^{\infty}$ maps is characterized by the infinitesimal $C^{\infty}$ stability. In the present paper, we study the counterpart in real analytic context. In particular, we show that the infinitesimal $C^{ω}$ stability does not imply $C^{ω}$ stability; for instance, a Whitney umbrella $R^{2} \to R^{3}$ is not $C^{ω}$ stable. A main tool for the proof is a relative version of Whitney's analytic approximation theorem that is shown by using H. Cartan's Theorems A and B.