母体血清胎盘标记物与前置胎盘之间的关联和诊断价值

Panpan Ma , Tingting Hu , Yiming Chen
{"title":"母体血清胎盘标记物与前置胎盘之间的关联和诊断价值","authors":"Panpan Ma ,&nbsp;Tingting Hu ,&nbsp;Yiming Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the correlation and diagnostic value of maternal serum placental markers: pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), free beta human chorionic gonadotropin (free β-hCG), and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) in relation to placenta previa.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective case-control study was conducted to gather data on 137 pregnant women who were hospitalized for delivery at Hangzhou Women’s Hospital. These women participated in the late stage of early and mid-term maternal serum prenatal screening between January 2018 and December 2020. Of the 137 women, 45 were diagnosed with placenta previa, while 92 were selected at random as the control group, in a ratio of 1: 2. Independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test were utilized to compare the quantitative data of the two groups, and the Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of maternal serum placental marker levels for placenta previa.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The levels of first trimester and second trimester free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (FT-Free β-hCG; ST-Free β-hCG) in the placenta previa group were higher than those in the normal group [1.38 (0.55–6.03) MoM vs.1.08 (0.32–4.00) MoM, 1.38 (0.39–4.10) MoM vs.1.01 (0.29–4.12) MoM], and the differences between the groups were statistically significant (<em>Z</em> = 2.830, <em>Z</em> = 2.846, both <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The AFP level was higher than the normal group [1.13 (0.65–2.15) MoM vs. 0.94 (0.51–2.02) MoM], and the difference was statistically significant (<em>Z</em> = 2.551, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in PAPP-A between the placenta previa group and the normal group (<em>Z</em> = 1.396, <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). The ROC curve analysis results showed that the AUCs of FT-Free β-hCG and ST-Free β-hCG for placenta previa were 0.649 (95 % CI: 0.551–0.747, <em>P</em> = 0.005), 0.634 (95 % CI: 0.539–0.730, <em>P</em> = 0.011), and 0.650 (95 % CI: 0.554–0.746, P = 0.004). Using PPV, NPV, FPR, FNR, +LR, and -LR as evaluation indicators for the 5 models, the results showed that FT-Free β-hCG was the best performer in terms of PPV, FPR, and +LR, with values of 0.725, 0.600, and 2.632, respectively. The three-indicator combined detection model (AFP + ST-Free β-hCG + FT-Free β-hCG) had the best performance in terms of NPV and -LR, with values of 0.770 and 0.298, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The elevated maternal serum levels of Free β-hCG and AFP may be associated with placenta previa. The combined detection of maternal serum markers in the early and mid-trimesters has better diagnostic value for predicting placenta previa than individual detection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37085,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association and diagnostic value between Maternal Serum Placental Markers and Placenta Previa\",\"authors\":\"Panpan Ma ,&nbsp;Tingting Hu ,&nbsp;Yiming Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the correlation and diagnostic value of maternal serum placental markers: pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), free beta human chorionic gonadotropin (free β-hCG), and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) in relation to placenta previa.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective case-control study was conducted to gather data on 137 pregnant women who were hospitalized for delivery at Hangzhou Women’s Hospital. These women participated in the late stage of early and mid-term maternal serum prenatal screening between January 2018 and December 2020. Of the 137 women, 45 were diagnosed with placenta previa, while 92 were selected at random as the control group, in a ratio of 1: 2. Independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test were utilized to compare the quantitative data of the two groups, and the Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of maternal serum placental marker levels for placenta previa.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The levels of first trimester and second trimester free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (FT-Free β-hCG; ST-Free β-hCG) in the placenta previa group were higher than those in the normal group [1.38 (0.55–6.03) MoM vs.1.08 (0.32–4.00) MoM, 1.38 (0.39–4.10) MoM vs.1.01 (0.29–4.12) MoM], and the differences between the groups were statistically significant (<em>Z</em> = 2.830, <em>Z</em> = 2.846, both <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The AFP level was higher than the normal group [1.13 (0.65–2.15) MoM vs. 0.94 (0.51–2.02) MoM], and the difference was statistically significant (<em>Z</em> = 2.551, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in PAPP-A between the placenta previa group and the normal group (<em>Z</em> = 1.396, <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). The ROC curve analysis results showed that the AUCs of FT-Free β-hCG and ST-Free β-hCG for placenta previa were 0.649 (95 % CI: 0.551–0.747, <em>P</em> = 0.005), 0.634 (95 % CI: 0.539–0.730, <em>P</em> = 0.011), and 0.650 (95 % CI: 0.554–0.746, P = 0.004). Using PPV, NPV, FPR, FNR, +LR, and -LR as evaluation indicators for the 5 models, the results showed that FT-Free β-hCG was the best performer in terms of PPV, FPR, and +LR, with values of 0.725, 0.600, and 2.632, respectively. The three-indicator combined detection model (AFP + ST-Free β-hCG + FT-Free β-hCG) had the best performance in terms of NPV and -LR, with values of 0.770 and 0.298, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The elevated maternal serum levels of Free β-hCG and AFP may be associated with placenta previa. The combined detection of maternal serum markers in the early and mid-trimesters has better diagnostic value for predicting placenta previa than individual detection.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000668\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在评估母体血清胎盘标志物:妊娠相关血浆蛋白-A(PAPP-A)、游离β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(游离β-hCG)和甲胎蛋白(AFP)与前置胎盘的相关性和诊断价值。方法 采用回顾性病例对照研究,收集了137名在杭州市妇保院住院分娩的孕妇数据。这些产妇在2018年1月至2020年12月期间参加了早中期孕产妇血清产前筛查的后期阶段。在137名产妇中,45名确诊为前置胎盘,92名随机抽取为对照组,两组比例为1:2,采用独立样本t检验或曼-惠特尼U检验比较两组的定量数据,采用接收者操作特征曲线(Receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)评价母体血清胎盘标志物水平对前置胎盘的诊断价值。结果 前置胎盘组的前三个月和后三个月游离β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素亚基(FT-Free β-hCG;ST-Free β-hCG)水平高于正常组[1.38 (0.55-6.03) MoM vs.1.08 (0.32-4.00) MoM,1.38 (0.39-4.10) MoM vs.1.01 (0.29-4.12) MoM],组间差异有统计学意义(Z = 2.830,Z = 2.846,P 均为 0.05)。AFP 水平高于正常组 [1.13 (0.65-2.15) MoM vs. 0.94 (0.51-2.02) MoM],差异有统计学意义(Z = 2.551,P < 0.05)。前置胎盘组与正常组的 PAPP-A 无明显差异(Z = 1.396,P > 0.05)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,前置胎盘的FT-Free β-hCG和ST-Free β-hCG的AUC分别为0.649(95 % CI:0.551-0.747,P = 0.005)、0.634(95 % CI:0.539-0.730,P = 0.011)和0.650(95 % CI:0.554-0.746,P = 0.004)。以 PPV、NPV、FPR、FNR、+LR 和 -LR 作为 5 个模型的评价指标,结果显示无 FT β-hCG 在 PPV、FPR 和 +LR 方面表现最佳,其值分别为 0.725、0.600 和 2.632。结论 母体血清游离β-hCG 和 AFP 水平升高可能与前置胎盘有关。在孕早期和孕中期联合检测母体血清标记物比单独检测更具有预测前置胎盘的诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Association and diagnostic value between Maternal Serum Placental Markers and Placenta Previa

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the correlation and diagnostic value of maternal serum placental markers: pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), free beta human chorionic gonadotropin (free β-hCG), and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) in relation to placenta previa.

Methods

A retrospective case-control study was conducted to gather data on 137 pregnant women who were hospitalized for delivery at Hangzhou Women’s Hospital. These women participated in the late stage of early and mid-term maternal serum prenatal screening between January 2018 and December 2020. Of the 137 women, 45 were diagnosed with placenta previa, while 92 were selected at random as the control group, in a ratio of 1: 2. Independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test were utilized to compare the quantitative data of the two groups, and the Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of maternal serum placental marker levels for placenta previa.

Results

The levels of first trimester and second trimester free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (FT-Free β-hCG; ST-Free β-hCG) in the placenta previa group were higher than those in the normal group [1.38 (0.55–6.03) MoM vs.1.08 (0.32–4.00) MoM, 1.38 (0.39–4.10) MoM vs.1.01 (0.29–4.12) MoM], and the differences between the groups were statistically significant (Z = 2.830, Z = 2.846, both P < 0.05). The AFP level was higher than the normal group [1.13 (0.65–2.15) MoM vs. 0.94 (0.51–2.02) MoM], and the difference was statistically significant (Z = 2.551, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in PAPP-A between the placenta previa group and the normal group (Z = 1.396, P > 0.05). The ROC curve analysis results showed that the AUCs of FT-Free β-hCG and ST-Free β-hCG for placenta previa were 0.649 (95 % CI: 0.551–0.747, P = 0.005), 0.634 (95 % CI: 0.539–0.730, P = 0.011), and 0.650 (95 % CI: 0.554–0.746, P = 0.004). Using PPV, NPV, FPR, FNR, +LR, and -LR as evaluation indicators for the 5 models, the results showed that FT-Free β-hCG was the best performer in terms of PPV, FPR, and +LR, with values of 0.725, 0.600, and 2.632, respectively. The three-indicator combined detection model (AFP + ST-Free β-hCG + FT-Free β-hCG) had the best performance in terms of NPV and -LR, with values of 0.770 and 0.298, respectively.

Conclusion

The elevated maternal serum levels of Free β-hCG and AFP may be associated with placenta previa. The combined detection of maternal serum markers in the early and mid-trimesters has better diagnostic value for predicting placenta previa than individual detection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Pentaerithrityl tetranitrate (PETN) for prevention of fetal growth restriction in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis Recurrent pain after laparoscopic surgery for ovarian endometrioma: Clinical features and long-term follow up The Association and diagnostic value between Maternal Serum Placental Markers and Placenta Previa Cervical cerclage vs cervical pessary in women with cervical insufficiency: A multicentric, open-label, randomised, controlled pilot trial [the CEPEIC trial] Vegetarian diet and pregnancy outcome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1