通过对心房颤动周期长度的复发量化分析,对心房颤动复发进行无创预测

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Biomedical Signal Processing and Control Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.bspc.2024.107037
Xujian Feng , Haonan Chen , Quan Fang , Taibo Chen , Cuiwei Yang
{"title":"通过对心房颤动周期长度的复发量化分析,对心房颤动复发进行无创预测","authors":"Xujian Feng ,&nbsp;Haonan Chen ,&nbsp;Quan Fang ,&nbsp;Taibo Chen ,&nbsp;Cuiwei Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.bspc.2024.107037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>The long-term success of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains limited, primarily due to inter-patient variability in AF mechanisms. The ventricular residuals in ECG f-wave extraction, along with the low temporal resolution in Fourier spectral analysis, significantly impact dynamic structure analysis and may compromise the accuracy of AF recurrence prediction. To address these challenges, this work aims to improve the interpretation of recurring patterns in AF cycle length (AFCL) to aid in preoperative patient screening.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>The study utilized data from a dataset of 87 patients (77 with persistent AF and 10 with paroxysmal AF). The variability of AFCL was derived from the extracted f-waves of lead V1 in preprocedural 250-second recordings with EEMD-based cycle identification. Recurrence plot indices (RPIs) from recurrence quantification analysis were introduced to characterize the dynamic structure of AFCL variability. A support vector machine prediction model was subsequently applied in 10-fold cross-validation to incorporate multivariate RPIs with feature selection.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>RPIs showed significant differences between recurrence and non-recurrence patients. In ten-fold cross-validation, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the prediction model were 75%, 100%, 90% for paroxysmal AF, and 66%, 75%, 71% for persistent AF. The recurrence prediction indicated significant differences in AF-free likelihood between patients predicted to recur and those predicted not, yielding p-values of 0.004 for paroxysmal AF and 0.001 for persistent AF.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Non-invasive AFCL dynamics analysis showed effective prediction of long-term outcomes, suggesting their potential to aid in patient selection for optimal AF ablation benefits and reveal recurrence-related AF mechanisms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55362,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-invasive prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence by recurrence quantification analysis on the fibrillation cycle length\",\"authors\":\"Xujian Feng ,&nbsp;Haonan Chen ,&nbsp;Quan Fang ,&nbsp;Taibo Chen ,&nbsp;Cuiwei Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bspc.2024.107037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>The long-term success of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains limited, primarily due to inter-patient variability in AF mechanisms. The ventricular residuals in ECG f-wave extraction, along with the low temporal resolution in Fourier spectral analysis, significantly impact dynamic structure analysis and may compromise the accuracy of AF recurrence prediction. To address these challenges, this work aims to improve the interpretation of recurring patterns in AF cycle length (AFCL) to aid in preoperative patient screening.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>The study utilized data from a dataset of 87 patients (77 with persistent AF and 10 with paroxysmal AF). The variability of AFCL was derived from the extracted f-waves of lead V1 in preprocedural 250-second recordings with EEMD-based cycle identification. Recurrence plot indices (RPIs) from recurrence quantification analysis were introduced to characterize the dynamic structure of AFCL variability. A support vector machine prediction model was subsequently applied in 10-fold cross-validation to incorporate multivariate RPIs with feature selection.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>RPIs showed significant differences between recurrence and non-recurrence patients. In ten-fold cross-validation, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the prediction model were 75%, 100%, 90% for paroxysmal AF, and 66%, 75%, 71% for persistent AF. The recurrence prediction indicated significant differences in AF-free likelihood between patients predicted to recur and those predicted not, yielding p-values of 0.004 for paroxysmal AF and 0.001 for persistent AF.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Non-invasive AFCL dynamics analysis showed effective prediction of long-term outcomes, suggesting their potential to aid in patient selection for optimal AF ablation benefits and reveal recurrence-related AF mechanisms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809424010954\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809424010954","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:心房颤动(房颤)消融术的长期成功率仍然有限,这主要是由于患者之间的房颤机制存在差异。心电图 f 波提取中的心室残余以及傅立叶频谱分析中的低时间分辨率严重影响了动态结构分析,并可能影响房颤复发预测的准确性。为了应对这些挑战,本研究旨在改进房颤周期长度(AFCL)复发模式的解释,以帮助术前患者筛查。方法:本研究利用了 87 名患者(77 名持续性房颤患者和 10 名阵发性房颤患者)的数据集。AFCL的变异性来自于术前250秒记录中V1导联f波的提取,并基于EEMD进行周期识别。从复发定量分析中引入了复发图指数(RPI),以描述 AFCL 变异性的动态结构。结果:复发图指数显示复发和非复发患者之间存在显著差异。在十倍交叉验证中,预测模型对阵发性房颤的灵敏度、特异性和准确性分别为 75%、100% 和 90%,对持续性房颤的灵敏度、特异性和准确性分别为 66%、75% 和 71%。复发预测表明,预测复发和预测不复发的患者之间的无房颤可能性存在显著差异,阵发性房颤的 p 值为 0.004,持续性房颤的 p 值为 0.001。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-invasive prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence by recurrence quantification analysis on the fibrillation cycle length

Objective:

The long-term success of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains limited, primarily due to inter-patient variability in AF mechanisms. The ventricular residuals in ECG f-wave extraction, along with the low temporal resolution in Fourier spectral analysis, significantly impact dynamic structure analysis and may compromise the accuracy of AF recurrence prediction. To address these challenges, this work aims to improve the interpretation of recurring patterns in AF cycle length (AFCL) to aid in preoperative patient screening.

Methods:

The study utilized data from a dataset of 87 patients (77 with persistent AF and 10 with paroxysmal AF). The variability of AFCL was derived from the extracted f-waves of lead V1 in preprocedural 250-second recordings with EEMD-based cycle identification. Recurrence plot indices (RPIs) from recurrence quantification analysis were introduced to characterize the dynamic structure of AFCL variability. A support vector machine prediction model was subsequently applied in 10-fold cross-validation to incorporate multivariate RPIs with feature selection.

Results:

RPIs showed significant differences between recurrence and non-recurrence patients. In ten-fold cross-validation, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the prediction model were 75%, 100%, 90% for paroxysmal AF, and 66%, 75%, 71% for persistent AF. The recurrence prediction indicated significant differences in AF-free likelihood between patients predicted to recur and those predicted not, yielding p-values of 0.004 for paroxysmal AF and 0.001 for persistent AF.

Conclusion:

Non-invasive AFCL dynamics analysis showed effective prediction of long-term outcomes, suggesting their potential to aid in patient selection for optimal AF ablation benefits and reveal recurrence-related AF mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
13.70%
发文量
822
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Biomedical Signal Processing and Control aims to provide a cross-disciplinary international forum for the interchange of information on research in the measurement and analysis of signals and images in clinical medicine and the biological sciences. Emphasis is placed on contributions dealing with the practical, applications-led research on the use of methods and devices in clinical diagnosis, patient monitoring and management. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control reflects the main areas in which these methods are being used and developed at the interface of both engineering and clinical science. The scope of the journal is defined to include relevant review papers, technical notes, short communications and letters. Tutorial papers and special issues will also be published.
期刊最新文献
Automated pericardium segmentation and epicardial adipose tissue quantification from computed tomography images A design of computational stochastic framework for the mathematical severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus model Topological feature search method for multichannel EEG: Application in ADHD classification ROPRNet: Deep learning-assisted recurrence prediction for retinopathy of prematurity Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1