推进互动式证据地图:可视化服务调试选项与研究

Helen Burchett, Claire Stansfield, Wendy Macdowall, Michelle Richardson, Samantha Dick, Kelly Dickson, Preethy D'Souza, Claire Khouja, Irene Kwan, Gary Raine, Amanda Sowden, Katy Sutcliffe, James Thomas
{"title":"推进互动式证据地图:可视化服务调试选项与研究","authors":"Helen Burchett,&nbsp;Claire Stansfield,&nbsp;Wendy Macdowall,&nbsp;Michelle Richardson,&nbsp;Samantha Dick,&nbsp;Kelly Dickson,&nbsp;Preethy D'Souza,&nbsp;Claire Khouja,&nbsp;Irene Kwan,&nbsp;Gary Raine,&nbsp;Amanda Sowden,&nbsp;Katy Sutcliffe,&nbsp;James Thomas","doi":"10.1002/cesm.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Interactive evidence maps typically visualise characteristics of research evidence, and gaps in evidence, in a particular field.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims, Materials &amp; Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Here we present an example of an evidence map on digital drug and alcohol interventions in which the research evidence is supplemented with information about interventions in use (or available for use) in England. We used systematic review methods to identify systematic reviews of intervention effectiveness and an online survey to identify interventions in England.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighteen reviews and 40 interventions were included in the online map.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion &amp; Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>To our knowledge, this is the first map to juxtapose research and practice in this way. By extending evidence maps to include data on service provision, it becomes easier to see whether research and practice are aligned and where gaps in either evidence or practice (or both) exist.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100286,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods","volume":"2 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cesm.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing interactive evidence maps: Visualising service commissioning options alongside research\",\"authors\":\"Helen Burchett,&nbsp;Claire Stansfield,&nbsp;Wendy Macdowall,&nbsp;Michelle Richardson,&nbsp;Samantha Dick,&nbsp;Kelly Dickson,&nbsp;Preethy D'Souza,&nbsp;Claire Khouja,&nbsp;Irene Kwan,&nbsp;Gary Raine,&nbsp;Amanda Sowden,&nbsp;Katy Sutcliffe,&nbsp;James Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cesm.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Interactive evidence maps typically visualise characteristics of research evidence, and gaps in evidence, in a particular field.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims, Materials &amp; Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Here we present an example of an evidence map on digital drug and alcohol interventions in which the research evidence is supplemented with information about interventions in use (or available for use) in England. We used systematic review methods to identify systematic reviews of intervention effectiveness and an online survey to identify interventions in England.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eighteen reviews and 40 interventions were included in the online map.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion &amp; Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>To our knowledge, this is the first map to juxtapose research and practice in this way. By extending evidence maps to include data on service provision, it becomes easier to see whether research and practice are aligned and where gaps in either evidence or practice (or both) exist.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods\",\"volume\":\"2 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cesm.70003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cesm.70003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cesm.70003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 交互式证据地图通常可视化特定领域的研究证据特征和证据缺口。 目的、材料和方法 在此,我们以数字药物和酒精干预措施为例,介绍了一个证据地图,其中的研究证据还补充了有关英格兰正在使用(或可使用)的干预措施的信息。我们采用系统性回顾方法来确定干预效果的系统性回顾,并通过在线调查来确定英格兰的干预措施。 结果 18 篇综述和 40 项干预措施被纳入在线地图。 讨论 & 结论 据我们所知,这是第一份以这种方式将研究与实践并列的地图。通过将证据地图扩展到包括服务提供数据,可以更容易地了解研究与实践是否一致,以及证据或实践(或两者)中存在的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advancing interactive evidence maps: Visualising service commissioning options alongside research

Background

Interactive evidence maps typically visualise characteristics of research evidence, and gaps in evidence, in a particular field.

Aims, Materials & Methods

Here we present an example of an evidence map on digital drug and alcohol interventions in which the research evidence is supplemented with information about interventions in use (or available for use) in England. We used systematic review methods to identify systematic reviews of intervention effectiveness and an online survey to identify interventions in England.

Results

Eighteen reviews and 40 interventions were included in the online map.

Discussion & Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first map to juxtapose research and practice in this way. By extending evidence maps to include data on service provision, it becomes easier to see whether research and practice are aligned and where gaps in either evidence or practice (or both) exist.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Methodological and reporting quality of systematic and rapid reviews on human mpox and their utility during a public health emergency Issue Information “Interest-holders”: A new term to replace “stakeholders” in the context of health research and policy Empowering the future of evidence-based healthcare: The Cochrane Early Career Professionals Network Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1