Fredrik Åberg,Ville Sallinen,Samuli Tuominen,Ilkka Helanterä,Arno Nordin
{"title":"原发性胆汁性胆管炎肝移植后环孢素与他克莫司的比较:倾向分数匹配的意向治疗登记研究。","authors":"Fredrik Åberg,Ville Sallinen,Samuli Tuominen,Ilkka Helanterä,Arno Nordin","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The optimal calcineurin inhibitor after liver transplantation (LT) for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) remains debated. We compared tacrolimus with cyclosporine in a propensity score-matched intention-to-treat analysis from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We included adults with PBC who underwent primary LT 1995-2022. Patients with initial cyclosporine treatment were 1:3 matched with those with initial tacrolimus treatment, ensuring exact calendar-period match. Primary outcomes were patient and graft survival. After matching, 579 patients with PBC and initial cyclosporine and 1348 with tacrolimus were well balanced for baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 11.1 years, 1044 (54%) deaths and 124 (6%) re-LTs occurred. In the overall matched sample, no significant survival difference emerged between cyclosporine and tacrolimus. However, tacrolimus conferred a survival advantage in some secondary analysis such as LT after year 2000, women, and in a 6-month landmark analysis excluding early post-operative events and calcineurin-inhibitor switches. Cyclosporine did not reduce graft loss from PBC recurrence or affect laboratory markers of recurrence. In conclusion, we found no benefit of starting immunosuppression with cyclosporine after LT for PBC.","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of cyclosporine and tacrolimus after liver transplantation for primary biliary cholangitis: A propensity-score matched intention-to-treat registry study.\",\"authors\":\"Fredrik Åberg,Ville Sallinen,Samuli Tuominen,Ilkka Helanterä,Arno Nordin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajt.2024.10.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The optimal calcineurin inhibitor after liver transplantation (LT) for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) remains debated. We compared tacrolimus with cyclosporine in a propensity score-matched intention-to-treat analysis from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We included adults with PBC who underwent primary LT 1995-2022. Patients with initial cyclosporine treatment were 1:3 matched with those with initial tacrolimus treatment, ensuring exact calendar-period match. Primary outcomes were patient and graft survival. After matching, 579 patients with PBC and initial cyclosporine and 1348 with tacrolimus were well balanced for baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 11.1 years, 1044 (54%) deaths and 124 (6%) re-LTs occurred. In the overall matched sample, no significant survival difference emerged between cyclosporine and tacrolimus. However, tacrolimus conferred a survival advantage in some secondary analysis such as LT after year 2000, women, and in a 6-month landmark analysis excluding early post-operative events and calcineurin-inhibitor switches. Cyclosporine did not reduce graft loss from PBC recurrence or affect laboratory markers of recurrence. In conclusion, we found no benefit of starting immunosuppression with cyclosporine after LT for PBC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2024.10.010\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2024.10.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of cyclosporine and tacrolimus after liver transplantation for primary biliary cholangitis: A propensity-score matched intention-to-treat registry study.
The optimal calcineurin inhibitor after liver transplantation (LT) for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) remains debated. We compared tacrolimus with cyclosporine in a propensity score-matched intention-to-treat analysis from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We included adults with PBC who underwent primary LT 1995-2022. Patients with initial cyclosporine treatment were 1:3 matched with those with initial tacrolimus treatment, ensuring exact calendar-period match. Primary outcomes were patient and graft survival. After matching, 579 patients with PBC and initial cyclosporine and 1348 with tacrolimus were well balanced for baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 11.1 years, 1044 (54%) deaths and 124 (6%) re-LTs occurred. In the overall matched sample, no significant survival difference emerged between cyclosporine and tacrolimus. However, tacrolimus conferred a survival advantage in some secondary analysis such as LT after year 2000, women, and in a 6-month landmark analysis excluding early post-operative events and calcineurin-inhibitor switches. Cyclosporine did not reduce graft loss from PBC recurrence or affect laboratory markers of recurrence. In conclusion, we found no benefit of starting immunosuppression with cyclosporine after LT for PBC.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide.
The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.