María Gutiérrez, Mª Angeles Moraga, Félix Garcia, Coral Calero
{"title":"从软件角度看绿色 IN 人工智能:最新技术与绿色十诫","authors":"María Gutiérrez, Mª Angeles Moraga, Félix Garcia, Coral Calero","doi":"10.1145/3698111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work presents a structured view of the state-of-the-art research on Artificial Intelligence (AI), from the point of view of efficiency and reduction of the energy consumption of AI Software. We analysed the current research on energy consumption of AI algorithms and its improvements, which gave us a starting literature corpus of 2688 papers that we identified as Green AI with a software perspective. We structure this corpus into Green IN AI and Green BY AI, which led us to discover that only 36 of them could be considered Green IN AI. After some quick insights about Green BY AI, we then introduce our main contribution: a systematic mapping of Green IN AI. We provide an in-depth analysis of the AI models that observed during the mapping, and what solutions have been proposed for improving their energy efficiency. We also analyse the energy evaluation methodologies employed in Green IN AI, discovering that most papers opt for a software-based energy estimation approach and a 27% of all papers not documenting their methodology. We finish by synthetising our insights from the mapping into a Decalogue of Good Practices for Green AI.","PeriodicalId":50926,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":23.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green IN Artificial Intelligence from a Software perspective: State-of-the-Art and Green Decalogue\",\"authors\":\"María Gutiérrez, Mª Angeles Moraga, Félix Garcia, Coral Calero\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3698111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work presents a structured view of the state-of-the-art research on Artificial Intelligence (AI), from the point of view of efficiency and reduction of the energy consumption of AI Software. We analysed the current research on energy consumption of AI algorithms and its improvements, which gave us a starting literature corpus of 2688 papers that we identified as Green AI with a software perspective. We structure this corpus into Green IN AI and Green BY AI, which led us to discover that only 36 of them could be considered Green IN AI. After some quick insights about Green BY AI, we then introduce our main contribution: a systematic mapping of Green IN AI. We provide an in-depth analysis of the AI models that observed during the mapping, and what solutions have been proposed for improving their energy efficiency. We also analyse the energy evaluation methodologies employed in Green IN AI, discovering that most papers opt for a software-based energy estimation approach and a 27% of all papers not documenting their methodology. We finish by synthetising our insights from the mapping into a Decalogue of Good Practices for Green AI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Computing Surveys\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":23.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Computing Surveys\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3698111\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3698111","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本作品从人工智能软件的能效和降低能耗的角度,对人工智能(AI)的最新研究成果进行了结构化的分析。我们分析了当前有关人工智能算法能耗及其改进的研究,由此建立了一个包含 2688 篇论文的文献语料库,并将其确定为从软件角度出发的绿色人工智能。我们将该语料库分为 "绿色人工智能"(Green IN AI)和 "绿色人工智能"(Green BY AI),结果发现其中只有 36 篇可被视为 "绿色人工智能"(Green IN AI)。在对 "Green BY AI "进行了一些简单了解之后,我们介绍了我们的主要贡献:对 "Green IN AI "进行系统映射。我们深入分析了映射过程中观察到的人工智能模型,以及为提高其能效而提出的解决方案。我们还分析了 "绿色 IN "人工智能中采用的能源评估方法,发现大多数论文选择了基于软件的能源估算方法,27%的论文没有记录其方法。最后,我们将从图谱中获得的见解综合为《绿色人工智能良好实践十诫》(Decalogue of Good Practices for Green AI)。
Green IN Artificial Intelligence from a Software perspective: State-of-the-Art and Green Decalogue
This work presents a structured view of the state-of-the-art research on Artificial Intelligence (AI), from the point of view of efficiency and reduction of the energy consumption of AI Software. We analysed the current research on energy consumption of AI algorithms and its improvements, which gave us a starting literature corpus of 2688 papers that we identified as Green AI with a software perspective. We structure this corpus into Green IN AI and Green BY AI, which led us to discover that only 36 of them could be considered Green IN AI. After some quick insights about Green BY AI, we then introduce our main contribution: a systematic mapping of Green IN AI. We provide an in-depth analysis of the AI models that observed during the mapping, and what solutions have been proposed for improving their energy efficiency. We also analyse the energy evaluation methodologies employed in Green IN AI, discovering that most papers opt for a software-based energy estimation approach and a 27% of all papers not documenting their methodology. We finish by synthetising our insights from the mapping into a Decalogue of Good Practices for Green AI.
期刊介绍:
ACM Computing Surveys is an academic journal that focuses on publishing surveys and tutorials on various areas of computing research and practice. The journal aims to provide comprehensive and easily understandable articles that guide readers through the literature and help them understand topics outside their specialties. In terms of impact, CSUR has a high reputation with a 2022 Impact Factor of 16.6. It is ranked 3rd out of 111 journals in the field of Computer Science Theory & Methods.
ACM Computing Surveys is indexed and abstracted in various services, including AI2 Semantic Scholar, Baidu, Clarivate/ISI: JCR, CNKI, DeepDyve, DTU, EBSCO: EDS/HOST, and IET Inspec, among others.