基于学习的人工智能作品:方法分类和质量评估

IF 23.8 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS ACM Computing Surveys Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1145/3698105
Qian Wang, Hong-NingH Dai, Jinghua Yang, Cai Guo, Peter Childs, Maaike Kleinsmann, Yike Guo, Pan Wang
{"title":"基于学习的人工智能作品:方法分类和质量评估","authors":"Qian Wang, Hong-NingH Dai, Jinghua Yang, Cai Guo, Peter Childs, Maaike Kleinsmann, Yike Guo, Pan Wang","doi":"10.1145/3698105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the development of the theory and technology of computer science, machine or computer painting is increasingly being explored in the creation of art. Machine-made works are referred to as artificial intelligence (AI) artworks. Early methods of AI artwork generation have been classified as non-photorealistic rendering (NPR) and, latterly, neural-style transfer methods have also been investigated. As technology advances, the variety of machine-generated artworks and the methods used to create them have proliferated. However, there is no unified and comprehensive system to classify and evaluate these works. To date, no work has generalised methods of creating AI artwork including learning-based methods for painting or drawing. Moreover, the taxonomy, evaluation and development of AI artwork methods face many challenges. This paper is motivated by these considerations. We first investigate current learning-based methods for making AI artworks and classify the methods according to art styles. Furthermore, we propose a consistent evaluation system for AI artworks and conduct a user study to evaluate the proposed system on different AI artworks. This evaluation system uses six criteria: beauty, color, texture, content detail, line and style. The user study demonstrates that the six-dimensional evaluation index is effective for different types of AI artworks.","PeriodicalId":50926,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":23.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning-based Artificial Intelligence Artwork: Methodology Taxonomy and Quality Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Qian Wang, Hong-NingH Dai, Jinghua Yang, Cai Guo, Peter Childs, Maaike Kleinsmann, Yike Guo, Pan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3698105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the development of the theory and technology of computer science, machine or computer painting is increasingly being explored in the creation of art. Machine-made works are referred to as artificial intelligence (AI) artworks. Early methods of AI artwork generation have been classified as non-photorealistic rendering (NPR) and, latterly, neural-style transfer methods have also been investigated. As technology advances, the variety of machine-generated artworks and the methods used to create them have proliferated. However, there is no unified and comprehensive system to classify and evaluate these works. To date, no work has generalised methods of creating AI artwork including learning-based methods for painting or drawing. Moreover, the taxonomy, evaluation and development of AI artwork methods face many challenges. This paper is motivated by these considerations. We first investigate current learning-based methods for making AI artworks and classify the methods according to art styles. Furthermore, we propose a consistent evaluation system for AI artworks and conduct a user study to evaluate the proposed system on different AI artworks. This evaluation system uses six criteria: beauty, color, texture, content detail, line and style. The user study demonstrates that the six-dimensional evaluation index is effective for different types of AI artworks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Computing Surveys\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":23.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Computing Surveys\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3698105\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3698105","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着计算机科学理论和技术的发展,机器绘画或计算机绘画在艺术创作中的探索日益增多。机器制作的作品被称为人工智能(AI)艺术品。早期的人工智能艺术品生成方法被归类为非逼真渲染(NPR),后来也研究了神经式传输方法。随着技术的进步,机器生成艺术品的种类和创作方法也在激增。然而,目前还没有一个统一而全面的系统来对这些作品进行分类和评估。迄今为止,还没有任何作品将人工智能艺术作品的创作方法(包括基于学习的绘画或素描方法)普遍化。此外,人工智能艺术作品的分类、评估和开发方法也面临诸多挑战。本文正是基于这些考虑而撰写的。我们首先调查了当前基于学习的人工智能艺术作品制作方法,并根据艺术风格对这些方法进行了分类。此外,我们还为人工智能艺术作品提出了一个一致的评估系统,并开展了一项用户研究,在不同的人工智能艺术作品上对所提出的系统进行评估。该评估系统采用六项标准:美感、色彩、质感、内容细节、线条和风格。用户研究表明,六维评价指标对不同类型的人工智能艺术作品都很有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning-based Artificial Intelligence Artwork: Methodology Taxonomy and Quality Evaluation
With the development of the theory and technology of computer science, machine or computer painting is increasingly being explored in the creation of art. Machine-made works are referred to as artificial intelligence (AI) artworks. Early methods of AI artwork generation have been classified as non-photorealistic rendering (NPR) and, latterly, neural-style transfer methods have also been investigated. As technology advances, the variety of machine-generated artworks and the methods used to create them have proliferated. However, there is no unified and comprehensive system to classify and evaluate these works. To date, no work has generalised methods of creating AI artwork including learning-based methods for painting or drawing. Moreover, the taxonomy, evaluation and development of AI artwork methods face many challenges. This paper is motivated by these considerations. We first investigate current learning-based methods for making AI artworks and classify the methods according to art styles. Furthermore, we propose a consistent evaluation system for AI artworks and conduct a user study to evaluate the proposed system on different AI artworks. This evaluation system uses six criteria: beauty, color, texture, content detail, line and style. The user study demonstrates that the six-dimensional evaluation index is effective for different types of AI artworks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Computing Surveys
ACM Computing Surveys 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
33.20
自引率
0.60%
发文量
372
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ACM Computing Surveys is an academic journal that focuses on publishing surveys and tutorials on various areas of computing research and practice. The journal aims to provide comprehensive and easily understandable articles that guide readers through the literature and help them understand topics outside their specialties. In terms of impact, CSUR has a high reputation with a 2022 Impact Factor of 16.6. It is ranked 3rd out of 111 journals in the field of Computer Science Theory & Methods. ACM Computing Surveys is indexed and abstracted in various services, including AI2 Semantic Scholar, Baidu, Clarivate/ISI: JCR, CNKI, DeepDyve, DTU, EBSCO: EDS/HOST, and IET Inspec, among others.
期刊最新文献
Collaborative Distributed Machine Learning Motivations, Challenges, Best Practices, and Benefits for Bots and Conversational Agents in Software Engineering: A Multivocal Literature Review Private and Secure Distributed Deep Learning: A Survey Backdoor Attacks and Defenses Targeting Multi-Domain AI Models: A Comprehensive Review Systematic Review of Generative Modelling Tools and Utility Metrics for Fully Synthetic Tabular Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1