爱尔兰当前的医学法律和监管文化对医学院研究生决定从事妇产科职业的影响

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.015
Mary-Elizabeth Tumelty , Eimear Spain , Ayesha Cheema , Kaitlyn Cinnamond , Ailish Hannigan , Santosh Sharma , Amanda Cotter
{"title":"爱尔兰当前的医学法律和监管文化对医学院研究生决定从事妇产科职业的影响","authors":"Mary-Elizabeth Tumelty ,&nbsp;Eimear Spain ,&nbsp;Ayesha Cheema ,&nbsp;Kaitlyn Cinnamond ,&nbsp;Ailish Hannigan ,&nbsp;Santosh Sharma ,&nbsp;Amanda Cotter","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Medico-legal and regulatory culture has a significant impact on medical practitioners, including the decision of graduates to enter high-risk specialties. This study explores the impact of the current medico-legal and regulatory culture in Ireland on the decision of graduate entry medical students to enter one high risk specialty, obstetrics and gynecology.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>We conducted a survey of 146 final-year, graduate-entry medical students pre- and post- a 6-week rotation in obstetrics and gynecology in Ireland. Participants were asked to rate the influence (on a four-point scale) of factors such as fear of being sued, being reported to the regulatory body or criminal prosecution on their decision to pursue a career in obstetrics or gynaecology. Data were matched pre- and post-rotation and McNemar-Bowker’s test was used to test for differences in related data. All analysis was conducted using SPSS for Windows version 25.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The responses of 72 students to both questionnaires could be matched (response rate 49.3%). The majority of participants pre-rotation reported that fear of being sued (74%), fear of being reported to the regulatory body (70%) and fear of criminal prosecution (55%) were factors influencing their decision (somewhat or to a great extent) to pursue a career in obstetrics. There were no significant changes post-rotation. Compared to obstetrics, lower proportions of participants pre-rotation considered fear of being sued (54%), fear of being reported to the regulatory body (50%) and fear of criminal prosecution (40%) as factors influencing their decision to pursue a career in gynecology. There were no significant changes post-rotation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Medico-legal and regulatory culture is shaping the perceptions of graduate entry medical students of obstetrics and gynecology and influencing their decision to pursue a career in the speciality. Understanding the impact of medico-legal culture on career choices including a high-risk specialty such as obstetrics and gynecology is important from both a policy and reform context, and if the healthcare service is to recruit and retain adequate numbers to ensure the safe provision of healthcare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"303 ","pages":"Pages 42-47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of the current medico-legal and regulatory culture in Ireland on the decision of graduate entry medical school students to pursue a career in obstetrics and gynecology\",\"authors\":\"Mary-Elizabeth Tumelty ,&nbsp;Eimear Spain ,&nbsp;Ayesha Cheema ,&nbsp;Kaitlyn Cinnamond ,&nbsp;Ailish Hannigan ,&nbsp;Santosh Sharma ,&nbsp;Amanda Cotter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Medico-legal and regulatory culture has a significant impact on medical practitioners, including the decision of graduates to enter high-risk specialties. This study explores the impact of the current medico-legal and regulatory culture in Ireland on the decision of graduate entry medical students to enter one high risk specialty, obstetrics and gynecology.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>We conducted a survey of 146 final-year, graduate-entry medical students pre- and post- a 6-week rotation in obstetrics and gynecology in Ireland. Participants were asked to rate the influence (on a four-point scale) of factors such as fear of being sued, being reported to the regulatory body or criminal prosecution on their decision to pursue a career in obstetrics or gynaecology. Data were matched pre- and post-rotation and McNemar-Bowker’s test was used to test for differences in related data. All analysis was conducted using SPSS for Windows version 25.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The responses of 72 students to both questionnaires could be matched (response rate 49.3%). The majority of participants pre-rotation reported that fear of being sued (74%), fear of being reported to the regulatory body (70%) and fear of criminal prosecution (55%) were factors influencing their decision (somewhat or to a great extent) to pursue a career in obstetrics. There were no significant changes post-rotation. Compared to obstetrics, lower proportions of participants pre-rotation considered fear of being sued (54%), fear of being reported to the regulatory body (50%) and fear of criminal prosecution (40%) as factors influencing their decision to pursue a career in gynecology. There were no significant changes post-rotation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Medico-legal and regulatory culture is shaping the perceptions of graduate entry medical students of obstetrics and gynecology and influencing their decision to pursue a career in the speciality. Understanding the impact of medico-legal culture on career choices including a high-risk specialty such as obstetrics and gynecology is important from both a policy and reform context, and if the healthcare service is to recruit and retain adequate numbers to ensure the safe provision of healthcare.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"volume\":\"303 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 42-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524005530\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524005530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的医学法律和监管文化对从医者有重大影响,包括毕业生进入高风险专业的决定。本研究探讨了爱尔兰当前的医学法律和监管文化对研究生入学医学生决定进入妇产科这一高风险专业的影响。研究设计我们对 146 名研究生入学医学生在爱尔兰妇产科进行 6 周轮转前后的情况进行了调查。我们要求参与者对害怕被起诉、被监管机构举报或被刑事起诉等因素对其决定从事妇产科职业的影响进行评分(4 分制)。数据在轮换前和轮换后进行配对,并使用 McNemar-Bowker 检验来检验相关数据的差异。所有分析均使用 SPSS for Windows 25 版本进行。大多数轮转前的参与者表示,害怕被起诉(74%)、害怕被监管机构举报(70%)和害怕被刑事起诉(55%)是影响他们决定(在一定程度上或很大程度上)从事产科职业的因素。轮转后没有明显变化。与产科相比,轮转前认为 "害怕被起诉(54%)"、"害怕被监管机构举报(50%)" 和 "害怕被刑事起诉(40%)"是影响他们决定从事妇科工作的因素的参与者比例较低。结论医学法律和监管文化正在影响妇产科医科研究生的观念,并影响他们从事该专业的决定。从政策和改革的角度来看,了解医学法律文化对职业选择(包括妇产科这样的高风险专科)的影响是非常重要的,如果医疗保健服务要招聘和留住足够的人才以确保医疗保健服务的安全提供,也是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of the current medico-legal and regulatory culture in Ireland on the decision of graduate entry medical school students to pursue a career in obstetrics and gynecology

Objectives

Medico-legal and regulatory culture has a significant impact on medical practitioners, including the decision of graduates to enter high-risk specialties. This study explores the impact of the current medico-legal and regulatory culture in Ireland on the decision of graduate entry medical students to enter one high risk specialty, obstetrics and gynecology.

Study Design

We conducted a survey of 146 final-year, graduate-entry medical students pre- and post- a 6-week rotation in obstetrics and gynecology in Ireland. Participants were asked to rate the influence (on a four-point scale) of factors such as fear of being sued, being reported to the regulatory body or criminal prosecution on their decision to pursue a career in obstetrics or gynaecology. Data were matched pre- and post-rotation and McNemar-Bowker’s test was used to test for differences in related data. All analysis was conducted using SPSS for Windows version 25.

Results

The responses of 72 students to both questionnaires could be matched (response rate 49.3%). The majority of participants pre-rotation reported that fear of being sued (74%), fear of being reported to the regulatory body (70%) and fear of criminal prosecution (55%) were factors influencing their decision (somewhat or to a great extent) to pursue a career in obstetrics. There were no significant changes post-rotation. Compared to obstetrics, lower proportions of participants pre-rotation considered fear of being sued (54%), fear of being reported to the regulatory body (50%) and fear of criminal prosecution (40%) as factors influencing their decision to pursue a career in gynecology. There were no significant changes post-rotation.

Conclusions

Medico-legal and regulatory culture is shaping the perceptions of graduate entry medical students of obstetrics and gynecology and influencing their decision to pursue a career in the speciality. Understanding the impact of medico-legal culture on career choices including a high-risk specialty such as obstetrics and gynecology is important from both a policy and reform context, and if the healthcare service is to recruit and retain adequate numbers to ensure the safe provision of healthcare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Maternal and perinatal outcomes following code red cesarean delivery performed among hospitals with different level of care. Case-control study of clotting differences using ROTEM testing in pregnant patients with early vaginal bleeding. Corrigendum to "Mode of delivery predicts postpartum maternal leukocyte telomere length" [Eur. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 300 (2024) 224-229]. Corrigendum to “Recombinant-Luteinzing hormone supplementation in women during IVF/ICSI cycles with GnRH-antagonist protocol: A systematic review and meta-analysis” [Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 283 (2023) 43–48] Comparative study on the effects of combined oral contraceptives and dienogest in women with endometriosis‑associated chronic pelvic pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1