智力是创造力的必要条件和充分条件吗?聚合思维和发散思维分析

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102575
Merav Dechaume , Maxence Mercier , Cyrille Feybesse , Todd Lubart , Gaëlle Chouvelon , Solenn Kermarrec , Sylvie Tordjman
{"title":"智力是创造力的必要条件和充分条件吗?聚合思维和发散思维分析","authors":"Merav Dechaume ,&nbsp;Maxence Mercier ,&nbsp;Cyrille Feybesse ,&nbsp;Todd Lubart ,&nbsp;Gaëlle Chouvelon ,&nbsp;Solenn Kermarrec ,&nbsp;Sylvie Tordjman","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examined the relationship between intelligence and creativity using divergent-exploratory and convergent-integrative thinking as key concepts. Researchers analyzed secondary data from 854 children, including 238 children with high intellectual potential (IQ &gt; 130). Intelligence was measured using WISC (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children), and creativity was assessed through EPoC (Evaluation of Potential for Creativity). Segmented Regression Analysis (SRA) and Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) explored these relationships. Positive correlations were found between convergent-integrative thinking and verbal comprehension or processing speed. However, no significant breakpoints were detected between Total IQ and creative potential sub-dimensions. A sufficient level of processing speed was necessary for achieving high divergent-exploratory thinking scores, while minimum levels of Total IQ or fluid reasoning were required for convergent-integrative thinking. The study suggested using a Generalized Additive Model (GAM) to capture complex, non-linear relationships. This approach offers educational insights by highlighting cognitive strengths and weaknesses in assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is intelligence necessary and sufficient for creativity? An analysis of convergent and divergent thinking\",\"authors\":\"Merav Dechaume ,&nbsp;Maxence Mercier ,&nbsp;Cyrille Feybesse ,&nbsp;Todd Lubart ,&nbsp;Gaëlle Chouvelon ,&nbsp;Solenn Kermarrec ,&nbsp;Sylvie Tordjman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examined the relationship between intelligence and creativity using divergent-exploratory and convergent-integrative thinking as key concepts. Researchers analyzed secondary data from 854 children, including 238 children with high intellectual potential (IQ &gt; 130). Intelligence was measured using WISC (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children), and creativity was assessed through EPoC (Evaluation of Potential for Creativity). Segmented Regression Analysis (SRA) and Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) explored these relationships. Positive correlations were found between convergent-integrative thinking and verbal comprehension or processing speed. However, no significant breakpoints were detected between Total IQ and creative potential sub-dimensions. A sufficient level of processing speed was necessary for achieving high divergent-exploratory thinking scores, while minimum levels of Total IQ or fluid reasoning were required for convergent-integrative thinking. The study suggested using a Generalized Additive Model (GAM) to capture complex, non-linear relationships. This approach offers educational insights by highlighting cognitive strengths and weaknesses in assessments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001687\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001687","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以发散-探索思维和聚合-整合思维为关键概念,探讨了智力与创造力之间的关系。研究人员分析了 854 名儿童的二手数据,其中包括 238 名高智力潜能儿童(IQ 130)。智力通过韦氏儿童智力量表(WISC)进行测量,创造力通过创造力潜能评估(EPoC)进行评估。分段回归分析(SRA)和必要条件分析(NCA)探讨了这些关系。发现聚合-整合思维与言语理解能力或处理速度之间存在正相关。然而,在总智商和创造潜能子维度之间没有发现明显的分界点。要获得较高的发散-探索性思维分数,必须有足够的处理速度,而收敛-整合思维则需要最低水平的总智商或流畅推理能力。研究建议使用广义相加模型(GAM)来捕捉复杂的非线性关系。这种方法通过突出评估中的认知强项和弱项,为教育提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is intelligence necessary and sufficient for creativity? An analysis of convergent and divergent thinking
This study examined the relationship between intelligence and creativity using divergent-exploratory and convergent-integrative thinking as key concepts. Researchers analyzed secondary data from 854 children, including 238 children with high intellectual potential (IQ > 130). Intelligence was measured using WISC (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children), and creativity was assessed through EPoC (Evaluation of Potential for Creativity). Segmented Regression Analysis (SRA) and Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) explored these relationships. Positive correlations were found between convergent-integrative thinking and verbal comprehension or processing speed. However, no significant breakpoints were detected between Total IQ and creative potential sub-dimensions. A sufficient level of processing speed was necessary for achieving high divergent-exploratory thinking scores, while minimum levels of Total IQ or fluid reasoning were required for convergent-integrative thinking. The study suggested using a Generalized Additive Model (GAM) to capture complex, non-linear relationships. This approach offers educational insights by highlighting cognitive strengths and weaknesses in assessments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
Latent profiles of Chinese students' social-emotional learning competencies and their associations with academic motivation and achievement Testing the generalizability of the multiplicative effects of expectancy and value across different ages, genders, and races Science motivation, academic achievement, career aspirations in early adolescents Parents' implicit intelligence beliefs about children's intelligence: Implications for children's academic self-concept and achievement in Maths, English, and French Is intelligence necessary and sufficient for creativity? An analysis of convergent and divergent thinking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1