同步脑电图记录大脑皮层对语音和运动运动学的追踪

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.10.013
Gilles Naeije , Maxime Niesen , Marc Vander Ghinst , Mathieu Bourguignon
{"title":"同步脑电图记录大脑皮层对语音和运动运动学的追踪","authors":"Gilles Naeije ,&nbsp;Maxime Niesen ,&nbsp;Marc Vander Ghinst ,&nbsp;Mathieu Bourguignon","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.10.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><strong><em>Rationale:</em></strong> Cortical activity is coupled with streams of sensory stimulation. The coupling with the temporal envelope of heard speech is known as the cortical tracking of speech (CTS), and that with movement kinematics is known as the corticokinematic coupling (CKC). Simultaneous measurement of both couplings is desirable in clinical settings, but it is unknown whether the inherent dual-tasking condition has an impact on CTS or CKC.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>We aim to determine whether and how CTS and CKC levels are affected when recorded simultaneously.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-three healthy young adults underwent 64-channel EEG recordings while listening to stories and while performing repetitive finger-tapping movements in 3 conditions: separately (<em>audio-</em> or <em>tapping-only</em>) or simultaneously (<em>audio-tapping</em>). CTS and CKC values were estimated using coherence analysis between each EEG signal and speech temporal envelope (CTS) or finger acceleration (CKC). CTS was also estimated as the reconstruction accuracy of a decoding model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across recordings, CTS assessed with reconstruction accuracy was significant in 85 % of the subjects at phrasal frequency (0.5 Hz) and in 68 % at syllabic frequencies (4–8 Hz), and CKC was significant in over 85 % of the subjects at movement frequency and its first harmonic. Comparing CTS and CKC values evaluated in separate recordings to those in simultaneous recordings revealed no significant difference and moderate-to-high levels of correlation.</div><div>Conclusion.</div><div>Despite the subtle behavioral effects, CTS and CKC are not evidently altered by the dual-task setting inherent to recording them simultaneously and can be evaluated simultaneously using EEG in clinical settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simultaneous EEG recording of cortical tracking of speech and movement kinematics\",\"authors\":\"Gilles Naeije ,&nbsp;Maxime Niesen ,&nbsp;Marc Vander Ghinst ,&nbsp;Mathieu Bourguignon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.10.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><strong><em>Rationale:</em></strong> Cortical activity is coupled with streams of sensory stimulation. The coupling with the temporal envelope of heard speech is known as the cortical tracking of speech (CTS), and that with movement kinematics is known as the corticokinematic coupling (CKC). Simultaneous measurement of both couplings is desirable in clinical settings, but it is unknown whether the inherent dual-tasking condition has an impact on CTS or CKC.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>We aim to determine whether and how CTS and CKC levels are affected when recorded simultaneously.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-three healthy young adults underwent 64-channel EEG recordings while listening to stories and while performing repetitive finger-tapping movements in 3 conditions: separately (<em>audio-</em> or <em>tapping-only</em>) or simultaneously (<em>audio-tapping</em>). CTS and CKC values were estimated using coherence analysis between each EEG signal and speech temporal envelope (CTS) or finger acceleration (CKC). CTS was also estimated as the reconstruction accuracy of a decoding model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across recordings, CTS assessed with reconstruction accuracy was significant in 85 % of the subjects at phrasal frequency (0.5 Hz) and in 68 % at syllabic frequencies (4–8 Hz), and CKC was significant in over 85 % of the subjects at movement frequency and its first harmonic. Comparing CTS and CKC values evaluated in separate recordings to those in simultaneous recordings revealed no significant difference and moderate-to-high levels of correlation.</div><div>Conclusion.</div><div>Despite the subtle behavioral effects, CTS and CKC are not evidently altered by the dual-task setting inherent to recording them simultaneously and can be evaluated simultaneously using EEG in clinical settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452224005165\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452224005165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由皮层活动与感觉刺激流相关联。与听到的语音的时间包络的耦合称为皮质语音跟踪(CTS),与运动运动学的耦合称为皮质运动学耦合(CKC)。我们的目的是确定在同时记录时,CTS 和 CKC 水平是否会受到影响,以及会受到怎样的影响。方法23 名健康的年轻人在听故事和做重复性手指敲击动作时接受了 64 通道脑电图记录,记录分为三种情况:分别记录(仅音频或敲击)或同时记录(音频-敲击)。通过分析每个脑电信号与语音时间包络(CTS)或手指加速度(CKC)之间的相干性,估算 CTS 和 CKC 值。结果在所有录音中,85% 的受试者在短语频率(0.5 Hz)和 68% 的受试者在音节频率(4-8 Hz)上用重建准确性评估的 CTS 显著,85% 以上的受试者在运动频率及其第一次谐波上用 CKC 评估的 CTS 显著。结论:尽管存在微妙的行为影响,但同时记录 CTS 和 CKC 的双任务设置并未明显改变 CTS 和 CKC,在临床环境中可使用脑电图同时进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simultaneous EEG recording of cortical tracking of speech and movement kinematics
Rationale: Cortical activity is coupled with streams of sensory stimulation. The coupling with the temporal envelope of heard speech is known as the cortical tracking of speech (CTS), and that with movement kinematics is known as the corticokinematic coupling (CKC). Simultaneous measurement of both couplings is desirable in clinical settings, but it is unknown whether the inherent dual-tasking condition has an impact on CTS or CKC.

Aim

We aim to determine whether and how CTS and CKC levels are affected when recorded simultaneously.

Methods

Twenty-three healthy young adults underwent 64-channel EEG recordings while listening to stories and while performing repetitive finger-tapping movements in 3 conditions: separately (audio- or tapping-only) or simultaneously (audio-tapping). CTS and CKC values were estimated using coherence analysis between each EEG signal and speech temporal envelope (CTS) or finger acceleration (CKC). CTS was also estimated as the reconstruction accuracy of a decoding model.

Results

Across recordings, CTS assessed with reconstruction accuracy was significant in 85 % of the subjects at phrasal frequency (0.5 Hz) and in 68 % at syllabic frequencies (4–8 Hz), and CKC was significant in over 85 % of the subjects at movement frequency and its first harmonic. Comparing CTS and CKC values evaluated in separate recordings to those in simultaneous recordings revealed no significant difference and moderate-to-high levels of correlation.
Conclusion.
Despite the subtle behavioral effects, CTS and CKC are not evidently altered by the dual-task setting inherent to recording them simultaneously and can be evaluated simultaneously using EEG in clinical settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience
Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
394
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
期刊最新文献
Thalamocortical dysrhythmia and reward deficiency syndrome as uncertainty disorders. Editorial Board Assessing visual motor performance in autistic children based on Kinect and fNIRS: A case study. Unveiling the veil of adipokines: A meta-analysis and systematic review in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Fecal microbiota transplantation alleviates neuronal Apoptosis, necroptosis and M1 polarization of microglia after ischemic stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1