与 PM2.5 暴露预防措施有关的因素:系统回顾

Q1 Social Sciences Global Transitions Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.glt.2024.10.002
Jeevan Bhatta, Orapin Laosee, Cheerawit Rattanapan
{"title":"与 PM2.5 暴露预防措施有关的因素:系统回顾","authors":"Jeevan Bhatta,&nbsp;Orapin Laosee,&nbsp;Cheerawit Rattanapan","doi":"10.1016/j.glt.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) exposure is a growing public concern that needs effective preventive measures. Adopting preventive measures plays a vital role in determining one's actions. This study systematically analyzed the factors related to preventive measures towards PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. A total of ten relevant studies were included in the study. The systematic review demonstrated that personal attitude towards PM<sub>2.5</sub>, perceived behavioral control, perceived risk, and subjective norms consistently had the most substantial impact on the intention to adopt preventive measures. Moreover, negative emotions, social norms, and educational level were also significant factors supported by consistent evidence across studies. Furthermore, perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived sensationalism, perceived norms, subjective norms, institutional trust, self-efficacy, income, desire, and knowledge also played a vital role in adopting preventive measures toward PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure. The study accentuates numerous approaches to determine an individual's intention in mitigating the effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure. The interplay between these factors highlights the complexity of PM<sub>2.5</sub> preventive measures. However, the review identified research gaps, including limited longitudinal studies and a need for more focus on actual behavior change beyond intention. Further research should address these gaps to inform more effective interventions for PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure mitigation at the personal level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33615,"journal":{"name":"Global Transitions","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 212-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors related to preventive measures towards PM2.5 exposure: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Jeevan Bhatta,&nbsp;Orapin Laosee,&nbsp;Cheerawit Rattanapan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.glt.2024.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) exposure is a growing public concern that needs effective preventive measures. Adopting preventive measures plays a vital role in determining one's actions. This study systematically analyzed the factors related to preventive measures towards PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. A total of ten relevant studies were included in the study. The systematic review demonstrated that personal attitude towards PM<sub>2.5</sub>, perceived behavioral control, perceived risk, and subjective norms consistently had the most substantial impact on the intention to adopt preventive measures. Moreover, negative emotions, social norms, and educational level were also significant factors supported by consistent evidence across studies. Furthermore, perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived sensationalism, perceived norms, subjective norms, institutional trust, self-efficacy, income, desire, and knowledge also played a vital role in adopting preventive measures toward PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure. The study accentuates numerous approaches to determine an individual's intention in mitigating the effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure. The interplay between these factors highlights the complexity of PM<sub>2.5</sub> preventive measures. However, the review identified research gaps, including limited longitudinal studies and a need for more focus on actual behavior change beyond intention. Further research should address these gaps to inform more effective interventions for PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure mitigation at the personal level.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Transitions\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 212-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Transitions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589791824000161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589791824000161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

细颗粒物(PM2.5)暴露是公众日益关注的问题,需要采取有效的预防措施。采取预防措施在决定个人行动方面起着至关重要的作用。本研究系统分析了与 PM2.5 暴露预防措施相关的因素。我们在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Embase 中进行了全面搜索。研究共纳入了十项相关研究。系统回顾表明,个人对 PM2.5 的态度、感知到的行为控制、感知到的风险和主观规范对采取预防措施的意向始终具有最实质性的影响。此外,负面情绪、社会规范和教育水平也是重要的因素,在各项研究中都得到了一致的证据支持。此外,感知到的严重性、感知到的易感性、感知到的耸人听闻、感知到的规范、主观规范、机构信任、自我效能感、收入、愿望和知识也在采取 PM2.5 暴露预防措施方面发挥了重要作用。这项研究强调了多种方法来确定个人减轻 PM2.5 暴露影响的意向。这些因素之间的相互作用凸显了 PM2.5 预防措施的复杂性。然而,综述发现了一些研究空白,包括有限的纵向研究,以及需要更多地关注意向之外的实际行为变化。进一步的研究应解决这些差距,为在个人层面减少 PM2.5 暴露提供更有效的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors related to preventive measures towards PM2.5 exposure: A systematic review
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure is a growing public concern that needs effective preventive measures. Adopting preventive measures plays a vital role in determining one's actions. This study systematically analyzed the factors related to preventive measures towards PM2.5 exposure. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. A total of ten relevant studies were included in the study. The systematic review demonstrated that personal attitude towards PM2.5, perceived behavioral control, perceived risk, and subjective norms consistently had the most substantial impact on the intention to adopt preventive measures. Moreover, negative emotions, social norms, and educational level were also significant factors supported by consistent evidence across studies. Furthermore, perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived sensationalism, perceived norms, subjective norms, institutional trust, self-efficacy, income, desire, and knowledge also played a vital role in adopting preventive measures toward PM2.5 exposure. The study accentuates numerous approaches to determine an individual's intention in mitigating the effects of PM2.5 exposure. The interplay between these factors highlights the complexity of PM2.5 preventive measures. However, the review identified research gaps, including limited longitudinal studies and a need for more focus on actual behavior change beyond intention. Further research should address these gaps to inform more effective interventions for PM2.5 exposure mitigation at the personal level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Transitions
Global Transitions Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Interplay between poverty, poverty eradication and sustainable development: A semi-systematic literature review Reduction in inpatient and severe condition visits for respiratory diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China Cancer as a global health crisis with deep evolutionary roots Exploring the nexus: Comparing and aligning Planetary Health, One Health, and EcoHealth The impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic exposure on current and future worldwide environmental protection across 18 nations in 6 continents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1