德语国家妇女对 COVID-19 大流行期间孕产妇和新生儿护理质量的看法:IMAgiNE EURO 项目比较德国、瑞士和奥地利数据的结果

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104209
Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin , Michael Gemperle , Ilaria Mariani , Alessia Abderhalden-Zellweger , Céline Miani , Christoph Zenzmaier , Antonia Nathalie Mueller , Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort , Martina Koenig-Bachmann , Claire De Labrusse , Maryse Arendt , Stefano Delle Vedove , Anouck Pfund , Imola Simon , Emanuelle Pessa Valente , Marzia Lazzerini , IMAgiNE Euro Study Group
{"title":"德语国家妇女对 COVID-19 大流行期间孕产妇和新生儿护理质量的看法:IMAgiNE EURO 项目比较德国、瑞士和奥地利数据的结果","authors":"Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin ,&nbsp;Michael Gemperle ,&nbsp;Ilaria Mariani ,&nbsp;Alessia Abderhalden-Zellweger ,&nbsp;Céline Miani ,&nbsp;Christoph Zenzmaier ,&nbsp;Antonia Nathalie Mueller ,&nbsp;Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort ,&nbsp;Martina Koenig-Bachmann ,&nbsp;Claire De Labrusse ,&nbsp;Maryse Arendt ,&nbsp;Stefano Delle Vedove ,&nbsp;Anouck Pfund ,&nbsp;Imola Simon ,&nbsp;Emanuelle Pessa Valente ,&nbsp;Marzia Lazzerini ,&nbsp;IMAgiNE Euro Study Group","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>Restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic compromised maternal and newborn care.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Countries in the German speaking area share several clinical care guidelines but differed significantly in the strictness of COVID-19 protective measures.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To investigate the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the German-speaking area and explore associations between the reorganisational changes due to COVID-19 and QMNC, as described with WHO Standards-based Quality Measures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>As part of the IMAgiNE EURO study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04847336), we conducted an online survey on the QMNC in the German-speaking area, including women who gave birth in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Descriptive statistics, Spearman rank correlation coefficient and multivariable quantile regression were used.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Out of a total of 70,721 women accessing the online questionnaire, 1,875 were included (Germany: <em>n</em> = 1,053, Switzerland: <em>n</em> = 494, Austria: <em>n</em> = 328). Significant differences across countries were found in Quality Measures. In Switzerland, women scored Quality Measures more favourable than in Germany and Austria in all four sub-indexes of QMNC. In Austria, Quality Measures gaps in the sub-index ‘Experience of care’ were higher. The sub-index ‘Reorganisational changes due to COVID-19′ correlated weakly to strongly with the other sub-indexes (between <em>r</em> = 0.33 and <em>r</em> = 0.62, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 for all correlations).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Midwives and other health professional should pay particular attention to the provision of respectful, high-quality care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To effectively improve QMNC, further research is essential to monitor the quality of care and develop targeted interventions beyond the COVID-19 pandemic addressing inherent challenges in the organisation and delivery of care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 104209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women ‘s perception on the quality of maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in German-speaking countries: Findings from the IMAgiNE EURO project comparing data from Germany, Switzerland and Austria\",\"authors\":\"Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin ,&nbsp;Michael Gemperle ,&nbsp;Ilaria Mariani ,&nbsp;Alessia Abderhalden-Zellweger ,&nbsp;Céline Miani ,&nbsp;Christoph Zenzmaier ,&nbsp;Antonia Nathalie Mueller ,&nbsp;Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort ,&nbsp;Martina Koenig-Bachmann ,&nbsp;Claire De Labrusse ,&nbsp;Maryse Arendt ,&nbsp;Stefano Delle Vedove ,&nbsp;Anouck Pfund ,&nbsp;Imola Simon ,&nbsp;Emanuelle Pessa Valente ,&nbsp;Marzia Lazzerini ,&nbsp;IMAgiNE Euro Study Group\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>Restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic compromised maternal and newborn care.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Countries in the German speaking area share several clinical care guidelines but differed significantly in the strictness of COVID-19 protective measures.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To investigate the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the German-speaking area and explore associations between the reorganisational changes due to COVID-19 and QMNC, as described with WHO Standards-based Quality Measures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>As part of the IMAgiNE EURO study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04847336), we conducted an online survey on the QMNC in the German-speaking area, including women who gave birth in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Descriptive statistics, Spearman rank correlation coefficient and multivariable quantile regression were used.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Out of a total of 70,721 women accessing the online questionnaire, 1,875 were included (Germany: <em>n</em> = 1,053, Switzerland: <em>n</em> = 494, Austria: <em>n</em> = 328). Significant differences across countries were found in Quality Measures. In Switzerland, women scored Quality Measures more favourable than in Germany and Austria in all four sub-indexes of QMNC. In Austria, Quality Measures gaps in the sub-index ‘Experience of care’ were higher. The sub-index ‘Reorganisational changes due to COVID-19′ correlated weakly to strongly with the other sub-indexes (between <em>r</em> = 0.33 and <em>r</em> = 0.62, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 for all correlations).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Midwives and other health professional should pay particular attention to the provision of respectful, high-quality care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To effectively improve QMNC, further research is essential to monitor the quality of care and develop targeted interventions beyond the COVID-19 pandemic addressing inherent challenges in the organisation and delivery of care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"140 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002924\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002924","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题COVID-19 大流行期间的限制损害了孕产妇和新生儿护理。背景德语区各国共享多项临床护理指南,但在 COVID-19 保护措施的严格程度方面却存在显著差异。方法作为IMAgiNE EURO研究(ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04847336)的一部分,我们对德语区的孕产妇和新生儿护理质量(QMNC)进行了在线调查,调查对象包括在德国、瑞士和奥地利分娩的妇女。我们采用了描述性统计、斯皮尔曼等级相关系数和多变量量化回归等方法。调查结果显示,在总共 70,721 名访问在线问卷的妇女中,有 1,875 人被纳入调查范围(德国:n = 1,053 人,瑞士:n = 494 人,奥地利:n = 328 人)。各国在 "质量测量 "方面存在显著差异。在瑞士,与德国和奥地利相比,妇女在 QMNC 的所有四个分指数中对质量措施的评分都更高。在奥地利,"护理体验 "分指数的质量测量差距更大。讨论助产士和其他卫生专业人员应特别注意提供受尊重的高质量护理。结论为有效改善 QMNC,必须开展进一步研究,以监测护理质量,并在 COVID-19 大流行后制定有针对性的干预措施,应对护理组织和提供方面的固有挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Women ‘s perception on the quality of maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in German-speaking countries: Findings from the IMAgiNE EURO project comparing data from Germany, Switzerland and Austria

Problem

Restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic compromised maternal and newborn care.

Background

Countries in the German speaking area share several clinical care guidelines but differed significantly in the strictness of COVID-19 protective measures.

Aim

To investigate the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the German-speaking area and explore associations between the reorganisational changes due to COVID-19 and QMNC, as described with WHO Standards-based Quality Measures.

Methods

As part of the IMAgiNE EURO study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04847336), we conducted an online survey on the QMNC in the German-speaking area, including women who gave birth in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Descriptive statistics, Spearman rank correlation coefficient and multivariable quantile regression were used.

Findings

Out of a total of 70,721 women accessing the online questionnaire, 1,875 were included (Germany: n = 1,053, Switzerland: n = 494, Austria: n = 328). Significant differences across countries were found in Quality Measures. In Switzerland, women scored Quality Measures more favourable than in Germany and Austria in all four sub-indexes of QMNC. In Austria, Quality Measures gaps in the sub-index ‘Experience of care’ were higher. The sub-index ‘Reorganisational changes due to COVID-19′ correlated weakly to strongly with the other sub-indexes (between r = 0.33 and r = 0.62, p < 0.001 for all correlations).

Discussion

Midwives and other health professional should pay particular attention to the provision of respectful, high-quality care.

Conclusion

To effectively improve QMNC, further research is essential to monitor the quality of care and develop targeted interventions beyond the COVID-19 pandemic addressing inherent challenges in the organisation and delivery of care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
The work of midwives: The socio-institutional theory of the meaning of midwives’ work-life balance International News January 2025 “With an unwanted pregnancy, we are looking for midwives in the neighbourhood to show us what to do.” Stakeholder perceptions of midwife-led woman-centred comprehensive abortion care in the province of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: a qualitative descriptive study The future of midwifery care and education in Belgium: A discussion paper. Effectiveness of supporting lifestyle change in pregnant mothers with obesity through the wearable internet-of-things (SLIM) -intervention on self-efficacy in weight management in pregnant women: A quasi-experimental trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1