{"title":"主体间性得到证实了吗?答复赫伦尼科夫和 QBists","authors":"Hervé Zwirn","doi":"10.1007/s10773-024-05806-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In two recent papers Khrennikov [1, 2] uses what he calls Ozawa’s intersubjectivity theorem [3] to claim that intersubjectivity is necessarily verified in quantum mechanics and to criticize QBism and more generally all interpretations that are perspectival. In agreement with two previous QBist’s papers [4, 5], I explain here why Khrennikov’s proof is not valid but in contrast with one of these papers [5], I criticize the way intersubjectivity is dealt with in QBism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":597,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Theoretical Physics","volume":"63 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Intersubjectivity Proven? A Reply to Khrennikov and to QBists\",\"authors\":\"Hervé Zwirn\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10773-024-05806-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In two recent papers Khrennikov [1, 2] uses what he calls Ozawa’s intersubjectivity theorem [3] to claim that intersubjectivity is necessarily verified in quantum mechanics and to criticize QBism and more generally all interpretations that are perspectival. In agreement with two previous QBist’s papers [4, 5], I explain here why Khrennikov’s proof is not valid but in contrast with one of these papers [5], I criticize the way intersubjectivity is dealt with in QBism.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Theoretical Physics\",\"volume\":\"63 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Theoretical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10773-024-05806-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Theoretical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10773-024-05806-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is Intersubjectivity Proven? A Reply to Khrennikov and to QBists
In two recent papers Khrennikov [1, 2] uses what he calls Ozawa’s intersubjectivity theorem [3] to claim that intersubjectivity is necessarily verified in quantum mechanics and to criticize QBism and more generally all interpretations that are perspectival. In agreement with two previous QBist’s papers [4, 5], I explain here why Khrennikov’s proof is not valid but in contrast with one of these papers [5], I criticize the way intersubjectivity is dealt with in QBism.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics publishes original research and reviews in theoretical physics and neighboring fields. Dedicated to the unification of the latest physics research, this journal seeks to map the direction of future research by original work in traditional physics like general relativity, quantum theory with relativistic quantum field theory,as used in particle physics, and by fresh inquiry into quantum measurement theory, and other similarly fundamental areas, e.g. quantum geometry and quantum logic, etc.