预测肾移植失败的竞争性和非竞争性风险模型

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of The American Society of Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1681/asn.0000000517
Agathe Truchot,Marc Raynaud,Ilkka Helanterä,Olivier Aubert,Nassim Kamar,Gillian Divard,Brad Astor,Christophe Legendre,Alexandre Hertig,Matthias Buchler,Marta Crespo,Enver Akalin,Gervasio Soler Pujol,Maria Cristina Ribeiro de Castro,Arthur J Matas,Camilo Ulloa,Stanley C Jordan,Edmund Huang,Ivana Juric,Nikolina Basic-Jukic,Maarten Coemans,Maarten Naesens,John J Friedewald,Helio Tedesco Silva,Carmen Lefaucheur,Dorry L Segev,Gary S Collins,Alexandre Loupy
{"title":"预测肾移植失败的竞争性和非竞争性风险模型","authors":"Agathe Truchot,Marc Raynaud,Ilkka Helanterä,Olivier Aubert,Nassim Kamar,Gillian Divard,Brad Astor,Christophe Legendre,Alexandre Hertig,Matthias Buchler,Marta Crespo,Enver Akalin,Gervasio Soler Pujol,Maria Cristina Ribeiro de Castro,Arthur J Matas,Camilo Ulloa,Stanley C Jordan,Edmund Huang,Ivana Juric,Nikolina Basic-Jukic,Maarten Coemans,Maarten Naesens,John J Friedewald,Helio Tedesco Silva,Carmen Lefaucheur,Dorry L Segev,Gary S Collins,Alexandre Loupy","doi":"10.1681/asn.0000000517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPrognostic models are becoming increasingly relevant in clinical trials as potential surrogate endpoints, and for patient management as clinical decision support tools. However, the impact of competing risks on model performance remains poorly investigated. We aimed to carefully assess the performance of competing risk and noncompeting risk models in the context of kidney transplantation, where allograft failure and death with a functioning graft are two competing outcomes.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe included 11,046 kidney transplant recipients enrolled in 10 countries. We developed prediction models for long-term kidney graft failure prediction, without accounting (i.e., censoring) and accounting for the competing risk of death with a functioning graft, using Cox, Fine-Gray, and cause-specific Cox regression models. To this aim, we followed a detailed and transparent analytical framework for competing and noncompeting risk modelling, and carefully assessed the models' development, stability, discrimination, calibration, overall fit, clinical utility, and generalizability in external validation cohorts and subpopulations. More than 15 metrics were used to provide an exhaustive assessment of model performance.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong 11,046 recipients in the derivation and validation cohorts, 1,497 (14%) lost their graft and 1,003 (9%) died with a functioning graft after a median follow-up post-risk evaluation of 4.7 years (IQR 2.7-7.0). The cumulative incidence of graft loss was similarly estimated by Kaplan-Meier and Aalen-Johansen methods (17% versus 16% in the derivation cohort). Cox and competing risk models showed similar and stable risk estimates for predicting long-term graft failure (average mean absolute prediction error of 0.0140, 0.0138 and 0.0135 for Cox, Fine-Gray, and cause-specific Cox models, respectively). Discrimination and overall fit were comparable in the validation cohorts, with concordance index ranging from 0.76 to 0.87. Across various subpopulations and clinical scenarios, the models performed well and similarly, although in some high-risk groups (such as donors over 65 years old), the findings suggest a trend towards moderately improved calibration when using a competing risk approach.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nCompeting and noncompeting risk models performed similarly in predicting long-term kidney graft failure.","PeriodicalId":17217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","volume":"232 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competing and Noncompeting Risk Models for Predicting Kidney Allograft Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Agathe Truchot,Marc Raynaud,Ilkka Helanterä,Olivier Aubert,Nassim Kamar,Gillian Divard,Brad Astor,Christophe Legendre,Alexandre Hertig,Matthias Buchler,Marta Crespo,Enver Akalin,Gervasio Soler Pujol,Maria Cristina Ribeiro de Castro,Arthur J Matas,Camilo Ulloa,Stanley C Jordan,Edmund Huang,Ivana Juric,Nikolina Basic-Jukic,Maarten Coemans,Maarten Naesens,John J Friedewald,Helio Tedesco Silva,Carmen Lefaucheur,Dorry L Segev,Gary S Collins,Alexandre Loupy\",\"doi\":\"10.1681/asn.0000000517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nPrognostic models are becoming increasingly relevant in clinical trials as potential surrogate endpoints, and for patient management as clinical decision support tools. However, the impact of competing risks on model performance remains poorly investigated. We aimed to carefully assess the performance of competing risk and noncompeting risk models in the context of kidney transplantation, where allograft failure and death with a functioning graft are two competing outcomes.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe included 11,046 kidney transplant recipients enrolled in 10 countries. We developed prediction models for long-term kidney graft failure prediction, without accounting (i.e., censoring) and accounting for the competing risk of death with a functioning graft, using Cox, Fine-Gray, and cause-specific Cox regression models. To this aim, we followed a detailed and transparent analytical framework for competing and noncompeting risk modelling, and carefully assessed the models' development, stability, discrimination, calibration, overall fit, clinical utility, and generalizability in external validation cohorts and subpopulations. More than 15 metrics were used to provide an exhaustive assessment of model performance.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAmong 11,046 recipients in the derivation and validation cohorts, 1,497 (14%) lost their graft and 1,003 (9%) died with a functioning graft after a median follow-up post-risk evaluation of 4.7 years (IQR 2.7-7.0). The cumulative incidence of graft loss was similarly estimated by Kaplan-Meier and Aalen-Johansen methods (17% versus 16% in the derivation cohort). Cox and competing risk models showed similar and stable risk estimates for predicting long-term graft failure (average mean absolute prediction error of 0.0140, 0.0138 and 0.0135 for Cox, Fine-Gray, and cause-specific Cox models, respectively). Discrimination and overall fit were comparable in the validation cohorts, with concordance index ranging from 0.76 to 0.87. Across various subpopulations and clinical scenarios, the models performed well and similarly, although in some high-risk groups (such as donors over 65 years old), the findings suggest a trend towards moderately improved calibration when using a competing risk approach.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nCompeting and noncompeting risk models performed similarly in predicting long-term kidney graft failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"232 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000000517\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000000517","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景诊断模型作为潜在的替代终点和临床决策支持工具,在临床试验和患者管理中的作用越来越大。然而,竞争性风险对模型性能的影响仍未得到充分研究。我们的目标是仔细评估竞争风险模型和非竞争风险模型在肾移植中的表现,在肾移植中,同种异体移植失败和功能正常的移植物死亡是两个竞争性结果。我们使用 Cox、Fine-Gray 和特定病因 Cox 回归模型建立了预测模型,用于预测长期肾移植失败,但不考虑(即普查)和功能正常的移植物死亡的竞争风险。为此,我们采用了详细而透明的分析框架来建立竞争和非竞争风险模型,并在外部验证队列和亚群中仔细评估了模型的开发、稳定性、区分度、校准、总体拟合度、临床实用性和可推广性。结果在推导和验证队列的 11,046 名受者中,有 1,497 人(14%)失去了移植物,1,003 人(9%)在风险评估后中位随访 4.7 年(IQR 2.7-7.0)后在移植物功能正常的情况下死亡。用 Kaplan-Meier 和 Aalen-Johansen 方法估算的移植物丢失累积发生率相似(衍生队列为 17% 对 16%)。Cox 模型和竞争风险模型在预测长期移植物失败方面显示出相似且稳定的风险估计值(Cox、Fine-Gray 和特定病因 Cox 模型的平均绝对预测误差分别为 0.0140、0.0138 和 0.0135)。在验证队列中,辨别度和总体拟合度相当,一致性指数在 0.76 至 0.87 之间。尽管在某些高风险群体(如 65 岁以上的供体)中,研究结果表明在使用竞争风险方法时,校准有适度改善的趋势,但在不同的亚群和临床情况下,模型的表现良好且相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Competing and Noncompeting Risk Models for Predicting Kidney Allograft Failure.
BACKGROUND Prognostic models are becoming increasingly relevant in clinical trials as potential surrogate endpoints, and for patient management as clinical decision support tools. However, the impact of competing risks on model performance remains poorly investigated. We aimed to carefully assess the performance of competing risk and noncompeting risk models in the context of kidney transplantation, where allograft failure and death with a functioning graft are two competing outcomes. METHODS We included 11,046 kidney transplant recipients enrolled in 10 countries. We developed prediction models for long-term kidney graft failure prediction, without accounting (i.e., censoring) and accounting for the competing risk of death with a functioning graft, using Cox, Fine-Gray, and cause-specific Cox regression models. To this aim, we followed a detailed and transparent analytical framework for competing and noncompeting risk modelling, and carefully assessed the models' development, stability, discrimination, calibration, overall fit, clinical utility, and generalizability in external validation cohorts and subpopulations. More than 15 metrics were used to provide an exhaustive assessment of model performance. RESULTS Among 11,046 recipients in the derivation and validation cohorts, 1,497 (14%) lost their graft and 1,003 (9%) died with a functioning graft after a median follow-up post-risk evaluation of 4.7 years (IQR 2.7-7.0). The cumulative incidence of graft loss was similarly estimated by Kaplan-Meier and Aalen-Johansen methods (17% versus 16% in the derivation cohort). Cox and competing risk models showed similar and stable risk estimates for predicting long-term graft failure (average mean absolute prediction error of 0.0140, 0.0138 and 0.0135 for Cox, Fine-Gray, and cause-specific Cox models, respectively). Discrimination and overall fit were comparable in the validation cohorts, with concordance index ranging from 0.76 to 0.87. Across various subpopulations and clinical scenarios, the models performed well and similarly, although in some high-risk groups (such as donors over 65 years old), the findings suggest a trend towards moderately improved calibration when using a competing risk approach. CONCLUSIONS Competing and noncompeting risk models performed similarly in predicting long-term kidney graft failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
Journal of The American Society of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
22.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
492
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN) stands as the preeminent kidney journal globally, offering an exceptional synthesis of cutting-edge basic research, clinical epidemiology, meta-analysis, and relevant editorial content. Representing a comprehensive resource, JASN encompasses clinical research, editorials distilling key findings, perspectives, and timely reviews. Editorials are skillfully crafted to elucidate the essential insights of the parent article, while JASN actively encourages the submission of Letters to the Editor discussing recently published articles. The reviews featured in JASN are consistently erudite and comprehensive, providing thorough coverage of respective fields. Since its inception in July 1990, JASN has been a monthly publication. JASN publishes original research reports and editorial content across a spectrum of basic and clinical science relevant to the broad discipline of nephrology. Topics covered include renal cell biology, developmental biology of the kidney, genetics of kidney disease, cell and transport physiology, hemodynamics and vascular regulation, mechanisms of blood pressure regulation, renal immunology, kidney pathology, pathophysiology of kidney diseases, nephrolithiasis, clinical nephrology (including dialysis and transplantation), and hypertension. Furthermore, articles addressing healthcare policy and care delivery issues relevant to nephrology are warmly welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Pediatric Nephrology Workforce and Access of Children with Kidney Failure to Transplantation in the United States. TRPML-1 Dysfunction and Renal Tubulopathy in Mucolipidosis Type IV. Disparities in Care: Desperate for Modality Education. Genotype-First Analysis in an Unselected Health System-Based Population and Phenotypic Severity of COL4A5 Variants. Need to Advance Pain Management in Kidney Failure beyond Opioid Medications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1