Dong Liang, Xiaojin Li, Shenrui Bai, Qiaoli Wang, Min Zeng, Demei Feng, Bo Lu, Xiaoqing Li, Zhiqiang Sun, Jianyun Li, Huanhuan Zhou, Jialu Zhang, Xiaoqin Chen, Zhongjun Xia, Yang Liang, Hua Wang
{"title":"新型药物时代诱导治疗的临床结果以及高危细胞遗传学异常(HRA)数量对新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者预后的影响:一项多中心研究的启示","authors":"Dong Liang, Xiaojin Li, Shenrui Bai, Qiaoli Wang, Min Zeng, Demei Feng, Bo Lu, Xiaoqing Li, Zhiqiang Sun, Jianyun Li, Huanhuan Zhou, Jialu Zhang, Xiaoqin Chen, Zhongjun Xia, Yang Liang, Hua Wang","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In the era of novel agents, the clinical outcomes of induction treatment and the impact of the number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) need to be explored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Through this study, we aim to analyze the effectiveness of different induction treatments and explore the survival outcomes of patients with varying numbers of HRA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 734 patients from seven medical centers were included in our study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients in the CD38 monoclonal antibody or IMiDs plus proteasome inhibitors (PI) groups had significantly superior overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those receiving IMiDs or PI alone. Additionally, the CD38 monoclonal antibody conferred a PFS advantage over IMiDs plus PI. Patients with ≥ 2 high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA) exhibited an extremely poor prognosis and should be considered ultra-high-risk individuals in multiple myeloma (MM). The CD38 monoclonal antibody, transplantation, and achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity only partly mitigated the poor prognosis in patients with HRA. Furthermore, patients with 1q21 gain/amplification (1q21+) only had a significantly worse prognosis compared to patients without HRA, and those with 1q21+ plus del17p or t(4;14) exhibited an inferior prognosis compared to those with 1q21+ alone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our results suggested that double-hit multiple myeloma was associated with extremely poor survival outcomes, and more effective treatments needed to be explored for this particular subtype of MM.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70270","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcome of Induction Treatment in the Era of Novel Agents and the Impact of the Number of High-Risk Cytogenetic Abnormalities (HRA) on Prognosis of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Insights From a Multicenter Study\",\"authors\":\"Dong Liang, Xiaojin Li, Shenrui Bai, Qiaoli Wang, Min Zeng, Demei Feng, Bo Lu, Xiaoqing Li, Zhiqiang Sun, Jianyun Li, Huanhuan Zhou, Jialu Zhang, Xiaoqin Chen, Zhongjun Xia, Yang Liang, Hua Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.70270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the era of novel agents, the clinical outcomes of induction treatment and the impact of the number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) need to be explored.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Through this study, we aim to analyze the effectiveness of different induction treatments and explore the survival outcomes of patients with varying numbers of HRA.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 734 patients from seven medical centers were included in our study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients in the CD38 monoclonal antibody or IMiDs plus proteasome inhibitors (PI) groups had significantly superior overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those receiving IMiDs or PI alone. Additionally, the CD38 monoclonal antibody conferred a PFS advantage over IMiDs plus PI. Patients with ≥ 2 high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA) exhibited an extremely poor prognosis and should be considered ultra-high-risk individuals in multiple myeloma (MM). The CD38 monoclonal antibody, transplantation, and achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity only partly mitigated the poor prognosis in patients with HRA. Furthermore, patients with 1q21 gain/amplification (1q21+) only had a significantly worse prognosis compared to patients without HRA, and those with 1q21+ plus del17p or t(4;14) exhibited an inferior prognosis compared to those with 1q21+ alone.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our results suggested that double-hit multiple myeloma was associated with extremely poor survival outcomes, and more effective treatments needed to be explored for this particular subtype of MM.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70270\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70270\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Outcome of Induction Treatment in the Era of Novel Agents and the Impact of the Number of High-Risk Cytogenetic Abnormalities (HRA) on Prognosis of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Insights From a Multicenter Study
Background
In the era of novel agents, the clinical outcomes of induction treatment and the impact of the number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) need to be explored.
Objective
Through this study, we aim to analyze the effectiveness of different induction treatments and explore the survival outcomes of patients with varying numbers of HRA.
Methods
A total of 734 patients from seven medical centers were included in our study.
Results
Patients in the CD38 monoclonal antibody or IMiDs plus proteasome inhibitors (PI) groups had significantly superior overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those receiving IMiDs or PI alone. Additionally, the CD38 monoclonal antibody conferred a PFS advantage over IMiDs plus PI. Patients with ≥ 2 high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA) exhibited an extremely poor prognosis and should be considered ultra-high-risk individuals in multiple myeloma (MM). The CD38 monoclonal antibody, transplantation, and achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity only partly mitigated the poor prognosis in patients with HRA. Furthermore, patients with 1q21 gain/amplification (1q21+) only had a significantly worse prognosis compared to patients without HRA, and those with 1q21+ plus del17p or t(4;14) exhibited an inferior prognosis compared to those with 1q21+ alone.
Conclusion
Our results suggested that double-hit multiple myeloma was associated with extremely poor survival outcomes, and more effective treatments needed to be explored for this particular subtype of MM.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas:
Clinical Cancer Research
Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations
Cancer Biology:
Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery.
Cancer Prevention:
Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach.
Bioinformatics:
Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers.
Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.