应用基于 ML 的方法绘制喜马拉雅东部地区共震滑坡易发性地图并确定重要控制因素

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1007/s12665-024-11911-9
Saurav Kumar, Aniruddha Sengupta
{"title":"应用基于 ML 的方法绘制喜马拉雅东部地区共震滑坡易发性地图并确定重要控制因素","authors":"Saurav Kumar,&nbsp;Aniruddha Sengupta","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-11911-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Co-seismic landslides pose a significant concern for the Himalayas and its nearby area due to high seismic activity in the region, coupled with steep slopes and heavy rainfall, responsible for substantial socioeconomic losses. Accurate and reliable Co-seismic landslide susceptibility maps are vital in highlighting high-risk zones where proactive measures can be taken to minimise the risk. Despite numerous machine learning (ML) models and landslide controlling factors being explored for susceptibility mapping, uncertainty remains about removing irrelevant factors and identifying optimal controlling factors for an ML based model. Further earlier research highlights that the performance of ML based models improves when optimal controlling factors are utilized for training the model. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), and Naive Bayes (NB) for co-seismic landslide susceptibility mapping and identifying most important controlling factors in the eastern Himalayan region. The landslide inventory of the 2011 Mw 6.9 Sikkim earthquake and a spatial database comprising 16 landslide-controlling factors have been utilised. A novel approach is proposed for selecting the optimal controlling factors for an ML model. Susceptibility maps for the Indian state of Sikkim are prepared by each model using optimal controlling factors. Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA), river distance, slope, fault distance, and elevation are identified as the most important factors, with the RF model showing superior performance. The outcomes of this study provide valuable insights for policymakers and engineers for land use planning and proactive measures to minimize losses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"83 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of ML- based approach for co-seismic landslides susceptibility mapping and identification of important controlling factors in eastern Himalayan region\",\"authors\":\"Saurav Kumar,&nbsp;Aniruddha Sengupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-024-11911-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Co-seismic landslides pose a significant concern for the Himalayas and its nearby area due to high seismic activity in the region, coupled with steep slopes and heavy rainfall, responsible for substantial socioeconomic losses. Accurate and reliable Co-seismic landslide susceptibility maps are vital in highlighting high-risk zones where proactive measures can be taken to minimise the risk. Despite numerous machine learning (ML) models and landslide controlling factors being explored for susceptibility mapping, uncertainty remains about removing irrelevant factors and identifying optimal controlling factors for an ML based model. Further earlier research highlights that the performance of ML based models improves when optimal controlling factors are utilized for training the model. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), and Naive Bayes (NB) for co-seismic landslide susceptibility mapping and identifying most important controlling factors in the eastern Himalayan region. The landslide inventory of the 2011 Mw 6.9 Sikkim earthquake and a spatial database comprising 16 landslide-controlling factors have been utilised. A novel approach is proposed for selecting the optimal controlling factors for an ML model. Susceptibility maps for the Indian state of Sikkim are prepared by each model using optimal controlling factors. Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA), river distance, slope, fault distance, and elevation are identified as the most important factors, with the RF model showing superior performance. The outcomes of this study provide valuable insights for policymakers and engineers for land use planning and proactive measures to minimize losses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"83 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11911-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11911-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于喜马拉雅山及其附近地区地震活动频繁,加之山坡陡峭、降雨量大,共震滑坡对该地区造成了重大的社会经济损失。准确可靠的共震滑坡易发性地图对于突出高风险区域至关重要,可以在这些区域采取积极措施将风险降至最低。尽管有许多机器学习(ML)模型和滑坡控制因素被用于绘制易感性地图,但在去除无关因素和确定基于 ML 模型的最佳控制因素方面仍存在不确定性。更早的研究强调,当利用最佳控制因素训练模型时,基于 ML 的模型的性能会得到改善。本研究旨在评估随机森林(RF)、逻辑回归(LR)和奈夫贝叶斯(NB)在喜马拉雅东部地区绘制共震滑坡易感性图和识别最重要控制因素方面的效率。利用了 2011 年锡金 6.9 级地震的滑坡清单和包含 16 个滑坡控制因素的空间数据库。提出了一种为 ML 模型选择最佳控制因素的新方法。每个模型都使用最优控制因子绘制了印度锡金邦的易感性图。峰值地面加速度 (PGA)、河流距离、坡度、断层距离和海拔被确定为最重要的因素,其中 RF 模型表现出卓越的性能。这项研究的成果为政策制定者和工程师提供了宝贵的见解,有助于他们进行土地利用规划和采取积极措施,最大限度地减少损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of ML- based approach for co-seismic landslides susceptibility mapping and identification of important controlling factors in eastern Himalayan region

Co-seismic landslides pose a significant concern for the Himalayas and its nearby area due to high seismic activity in the region, coupled with steep slopes and heavy rainfall, responsible for substantial socioeconomic losses. Accurate and reliable Co-seismic landslide susceptibility maps are vital in highlighting high-risk zones where proactive measures can be taken to minimise the risk. Despite numerous machine learning (ML) models and landslide controlling factors being explored for susceptibility mapping, uncertainty remains about removing irrelevant factors and identifying optimal controlling factors for an ML based model. Further earlier research highlights that the performance of ML based models improves when optimal controlling factors are utilized for training the model. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), and Naive Bayes (NB) for co-seismic landslide susceptibility mapping and identifying most important controlling factors in the eastern Himalayan region. The landslide inventory of the 2011 Mw 6.9 Sikkim earthquake and a spatial database comprising 16 landslide-controlling factors have been utilised. A novel approach is proposed for selecting the optimal controlling factors for an ML model. Susceptibility maps for the Indian state of Sikkim are prepared by each model using optimal controlling factors. Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA), river distance, slope, fault distance, and elevation are identified as the most important factors, with the RF model showing superior performance. The outcomes of this study provide valuable insights for policymakers and engineers for land use planning and proactive measures to minimize losses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of soil carbon density distribution and influencing factors in typical karst regions of China Stability against toppling of a single rock block resting on an irregular rough base Riverine Cu-distribution in sediments of the Jaba-Kawerong river system 30 years after cease of mining at Panguna/Bougainville Effect of loading rates on mechanical behavior and strain localization characteristics of sandstone Review of test methods for the micro-pore characteristics of soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1