Yoji Hoshina, Justin R Abbatemarco, Stefanie J Rodenbeck, Jason T Poon, Suzanne C Liu, M Mateo Paz Soldan, John E Greenlee, John W Rose, Lisa K Peterson, Lisa Johnson, Alen Delic, Tammy L Smith, Stacey L Clardy
{"title":"匹配的寡克隆带:诊断效用和临床特征。","authors":"Yoji Hoshina, Justin R Abbatemarco, Stefanie J Rodenbeck, Jason T Poon, Suzanne C Liu, M Mateo Paz Soldan, John E Greenlee, John W Rose, Lisa K Peterson, Lisa Johnson, Alen Delic, Tammy L Smith, Stacey L Clardy","doi":"10.1002/acn3.52162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe patient clinical characteristics associated with matched oligoclonal bands (OCB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review at the University of Utah examined patients with matched OCB from 2015 to 2020. Clinical data, diagnosis, and outcomes were collected. Patients were classified with either multiple sclerosis (MS), other inflammatory neurologic disorder (other-IND), or noninflammatory neurologic disorder (NIND).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 539 identified patients, 436 (53.4% female) were matched-only, while 103 (43.7% female) were matched + unique. Patients with matched-only bands were older (57.4 ± 16 vs. 52 ± 14.2, p < 0.001) and more likely to have a history of autoimmune disease (40.1% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.024) and/or cancer (28.7% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.012). Patients with matched + unique bands were more likely to have CSF pleocytosis (52.4% vs. 25.9%, p < 0.001), high IgG index (52.2% vs. 7.6%, p < 0.001), and an abnormal MRI (86.9% vs. 63.1%, p < 0.001). More than two-thirds of matched-only patients had NIND, while 33% and 41.7% of matched + unique patients had MS and other-IND, respectively. Patients exhibiting matched-only bands and a high IgG index demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of other-IND compared to those with matched-only bands and a normal IgG index (55.6% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.013). While Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated higher mortality in the matched-only cohort compared to the matched + unique cohort (p = 0.02), multivariable Cox regression analysis showed this difference was not statistically significant when adjusting for various factors. A history of cancer was the significant predictor of increased mortality risk (Hazard ratio = 3.147, 95% CI [2.196, 4.51]).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Patients with matched only versus matched + unique OCB have distinct clinical profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Matched oligoclonal bands: Diagnostic utility and clinical characteristics.\",\"authors\":\"Yoji Hoshina, Justin R Abbatemarco, Stefanie J Rodenbeck, Jason T Poon, Suzanne C Liu, M Mateo Paz Soldan, John E Greenlee, John W Rose, Lisa K Peterson, Lisa Johnson, Alen Delic, Tammy L Smith, Stacey L Clardy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acn3.52162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe patient clinical characteristics associated with matched oligoclonal bands (OCB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review at the University of Utah examined patients with matched OCB from 2015 to 2020. Clinical data, diagnosis, and outcomes were collected. Patients were classified with either multiple sclerosis (MS), other inflammatory neurologic disorder (other-IND), or noninflammatory neurologic disorder (NIND).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 539 identified patients, 436 (53.4% female) were matched-only, while 103 (43.7% female) were matched + unique. Patients with matched-only bands were older (57.4 ± 16 vs. 52 ± 14.2, p < 0.001) and more likely to have a history of autoimmune disease (40.1% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.024) and/or cancer (28.7% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.012). Patients with matched + unique bands were more likely to have CSF pleocytosis (52.4% vs. 25.9%, p < 0.001), high IgG index (52.2% vs. 7.6%, p < 0.001), and an abnormal MRI (86.9% vs. 63.1%, p < 0.001). More than two-thirds of matched-only patients had NIND, while 33% and 41.7% of matched + unique patients had MS and other-IND, respectively. Patients exhibiting matched-only bands and a high IgG index demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of other-IND compared to those with matched-only bands and a normal IgG index (55.6% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.013). While Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated higher mortality in the matched-only cohort compared to the matched + unique cohort (p = 0.02), multivariable Cox regression analysis showed this difference was not statistically significant when adjusting for various factors. A history of cancer was the significant predictor of increased mortality risk (Hazard ratio = 3.147, 95% CI [2.196, 4.51]).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Patients with matched only versus matched + unique OCB have distinct clinical profiles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52162\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Matched oligoclonal bands: Diagnostic utility and clinical characteristics.
Objective: To describe patient clinical characteristics associated with matched oligoclonal bands (OCB).
Methods: A retrospective review at the University of Utah examined patients with matched OCB from 2015 to 2020. Clinical data, diagnosis, and outcomes were collected. Patients were classified with either multiple sclerosis (MS), other inflammatory neurologic disorder (other-IND), or noninflammatory neurologic disorder (NIND).
Results: Of 539 identified patients, 436 (53.4% female) were matched-only, while 103 (43.7% female) were matched + unique. Patients with matched-only bands were older (57.4 ± 16 vs. 52 ± 14.2, p < 0.001) and more likely to have a history of autoimmune disease (40.1% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.024) and/or cancer (28.7% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.012). Patients with matched + unique bands were more likely to have CSF pleocytosis (52.4% vs. 25.9%, p < 0.001), high IgG index (52.2% vs. 7.6%, p < 0.001), and an abnormal MRI (86.9% vs. 63.1%, p < 0.001). More than two-thirds of matched-only patients had NIND, while 33% and 41.7% of matched + unique patients had MS and other-IND, respectively. Patients exhibiting matched-only bands and a high IgG index demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of other-IND compared to those with matched-only bands and a normal IgG index (55.6% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.013). While Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated higher mortality in the matched-only cohort compared to the matched + unique cohort (p = 0.02), multivariable Cox regression analysis showed this difference was not statistically significant when adjusting for various factors. A history of cancer was the significant predictor of increased mortality risk (Hazard ratio = 3.147, 95% CI [2.196, 4.51]).
Interpretation: Patients with matched only versus matched + unique OCB have distinct clinical profiles.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.