瑞典和挪威孕产妇和新生儿护理质量趋势与世界卫生组织 12 个欧洲国家的比较:在 COVID-19 大流行期间对孕产妇观点的横断面调查。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1111/aogs.14994
Mehreen Zaigham, Karolina Linden, Helen Elden, Stefano Delle Vedove, Ilaria Mariani, Sigrun Kongslien, Daniela Drandić, Elizabete Pumpure, Zalka Drglin, Raquel Costa, Antigoni Sarantaki, Claire de Labrusse, Céline Miani, Marina Ruxandra Oțelea, Alina Liepinaitienė, Barbara Baranowska, Virginie Rozée, Emanuelle Pessa Valente, Eline Skirnisdottir Vik, Magdalena Kurbanović, Dārta Jakovicka, Anja Bohinec, Heloísa Dias, Dimitra Metallinou, Antonia N Mueller, Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort, Claudia Mariana Handra, Marija Mizgaitienė, Urszula Tataj-Puzyna, Arianna Bomben, Ingvild Hersoug Nedberg, Elīna Voitehoviča, Tiago Miguel Pinto, Aikaterini Lykeridou, Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin, Simona Jazdauskienė, Beata Szlendak, Emma Sacks, Marzia Lazzerini
{"title":"瑞典和挪威孕产妇和新生儿护理质量趋势与世界卫生组织 12 个欧洲国家的比较:在 COVID-19 大流行期间对孕产妇观点的横断面调查。","authors":"Mehreen Zaigham, Karolina Linden, Helen Elden, Stefano Delle Vedove, Ilaria Mariani, Sigrun Kongslien, Daniela Drandić, Elizabete Pumpure, Zalka Drglin, Raquel Costa, Antigoni Sarantaki, Claire de Labrusse, Céline Miani, Marina Ruxandra Oțelea, Alina Liepinaitienė, Barbara Baranowska, Virginie Rozée, Emanuelle Pessa Valente, Eline Skirnisdottir Vik, Magdalena Kurbanović, Dārta Jakovicka, Anja Bohinec, Heloísa Dias, Dimitra Metallinou, Antonia N Mueller, Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort, Claudia Mariana Handra, Marija Mizgaitienė, Urszula Tataj-Puzyna, Arianna Bomben, Ingvild Hersoug Nedberg, Elīna Voitehoviča, Tiago Miguel Pinto, Aikaterini Lykeridou, Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin, Simona Jazdauskienė, Beata Szlendak, Emma Sacks, Marzia Lazzerini","doi":"10.1111/aogs.14994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maternal-neonatal healthcare services were severely disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic in even high-income countries within the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region. The objective of this study was to compare trends in the quality of maternal and neonatal care (QMNC) in Sweden and Norway to 12 other countries from the WHO European Region during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to identify domains for improvement.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included women giving birth in Europe from March 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022. Women answered an online, anonymous questionnaire which included 40 WHO Standard-based Quality Measures collectively scored as the total QMNC index (0-400) and separately in four subdomains (0-100): provision of care, experience of care, availability of human and physical resources, and reorganizational changes due to COVID-19. To assess reported QMNC changes over time, we used adjusted quantile regression models.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov Identifier: NCT04847336.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 45151 women included in the study, 13 117 (29.1%) were from Sweden and Norway and 32034 (70.9%) from the 12 WHO European countries. The total QMNC index for Sweden and Norway (median: 325, IQR: 285-355) was higher than the 12 WHO European countries (median: 315, IQR: 265-350, p < 0.001) as were trends in QMNC index over time (Sweden and Norway median: 310-345; 12 WHO European countries median: 305-340). Sweden and Norway also had higher scores in three-of-four QMNC subdomains, with the 12 WHO European countries scoring higher only for reorganizational changes due to COVID-19. In adjusted quantile models of the total QMNC index, Sweden and Norway had higher scores, with largest differences in the lower quantiles (p < 0.001 in all percentiles).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across Europe, there are significant gaps in the quality of maternal-neonatal healthcare services. Although women giving birth in Sweden and Norway reported higher QMNC scores in all subdomains except for \"reorganizational changes due to COVID-19,\" there is room for improvement and shared learning across Europe. Policymakers should prioritize long-term investments in maternal and neonatal healthcare, ensuring that facilities are adequately equipped during public health crises and that all women have access to high-quality, evidence-based, equitable, and respectful care.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in the quality of maternal and neonatal care in Sweden and Norway as compared to 12 WHO European countries: A cross-sectional survey investigating maternal perspectives during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Mehreen Zaigham, Karolina Linden, Helen Elden, Stefano Delle Vedove, Ilaria Mariani, Sigrun Kongslien, Daniela Drandić, Elizabete Pumpure, Zalka Drglin, Raquel Costa, Antigoni Sarantaki, Claire de Labrusse, Céline Miani, Marina Ruxandra Oțelea, Alina Liepinaitienė, Barbara Baranowska, Virginie Rozée, Emanuelle Pessa Valente, Eline Skirnisdottir Vik, Magdalena Kurbanović, Dārta Jakovicka, Anja Bohinec, Heloísa Dias, Dimitra Metallinou, Antonia N Mueller, Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort, Claudia Mariana Handra, Marija Mizgaitienė, Urszula Tataj-Puzyna, Arianna Bomben, Ingvild Hersoug Nedberg, Elīna Voitehoviča, Tiago Miguel Pinto, Aikaterini Lykeridou, Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin, Simona Jazdauskienė, Beata Szlendak, Emma Sacks, Marzia Lazzerini\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aogs.14994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maternal-neonatal healthcare services were severely disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic in even high-income countries within the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region. The objective of this study was to compare trends in the quality of maternal and neonatal care (QMNC) in Sweden and Norway to 12 other countries from the WHO European Region during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to identify domains for improvement.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included women giving birth in Europe from March 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022. Women answered an online, anonymous questionnaire which included 40 WHO Standard-based Quality Measures collectively scored as the total QMNC index (0-400) and separately in four subdomains (0-100): provision of care, experience of care, availability of human and physical resources, and reorganizational changes due to COVID-19. To assess reported QMNC changes over time, we used adjusted quantile regression models.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov Identifier: NCT04847336.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 45151 women included in the study, 13 117 (29.1%) were from Sweden and Norway and 32034 (70.9%) from the 12 WHO European countries. The total QMNC index for Sweden and Norway (median: 325, IQR: 285-355) was higher than the 12 WHO European countries (median: 315, IQR: 265-350, p < 0.001) as were trends in QMNC index over time (Sweden and Norway median: 310-345; 12 WHO European countries median: 305-340). Sweden and Norway also had higher scores in three-of-four QMNC subdomains, with the 12 WHO European countries scoring higher only for reorganizational changes due to COVID-19. In adjusted quantile models of the total QMNC index, Sweden and Norway had higher scores, with largest differences in the lower quantiles (p < 0.001 in all percentiles).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across Europe, there are significant gaps in the quality of maternal-neonatal healthcare services. Although women giving birth in Sweden and Norway reported higher QMNC scores in all subdomains except for \\\"reorganizational changes due to COVID-19,\\\" there is room for improvement and shared learning across Europe. Policymakers should prioritize long-term investments in maternal and neonatal healthcare, ensuring that facilities are adequately equipped during public health crises and that all women have access to high-quality, evidence-based, equitable, and respectful care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14994\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14994","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,即使在世界卫生组织(WHO)欧洲地区的高收入国家,孕产妇和新生儿医疗保健服务也受到了严重破坏。本研究旨在比较瑞典和挪威与世界卫生组织欧洲地区其他12个国家在COVID-19大流行期间的孕产妇和新生儿护理质量(QMNC)趋势,并确定需要改进的领域:这项横断面研究包括 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间在欧洲分娩的妇女。妇女们回答了一份在线匿名调查问卷,其中包括 40 项基于世界卫生组织标准的质量衡量标准,这些衡量标准被统称为 QMNC 总指数(0-400),并在四个子域(0-100)中分别计分:提供护理、护理体验、人力和物力资源的可用性,以及 COVID-19 带来的重组变化。为了评估所报告的 QMNC 随时间的变化,我们使用了调整后的量化回归模型:NCT04847336.结果:在纳入研究的 45151 名妇女中,13117 人(29.1%)来自瑞典和挪威,32034 人(70.9%)来自世界卫生组织的 12 个欧洲国家。瑞典和挪威的 QMNC 总指数(中位数:325,IQR:285-355)高于世卫组织的 12 个欧洲国家(中位数:315,IQR:265-355):中位数:315,IQR:265-350,P在整个欧洲,孕产妇和新生儿医疗保健服务的质量存在明显差距。尽管除 "COVID-19 导致的重组变化 "外,瑞典和挪威的产妇在所有子领域的 QMNC 分数都较高,但整个欧洲仍有改进和共同学习的空间。政策制定者应优先考虑对孕产妇和新生儿医疗保健的长期投资,确保在公共卫生危机期间为医疗机构提供充足的设备,并确保所有妇女都能获得高质量、循证、公平和受尊重的医疗保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trends in the quality of maternal and neonatal care in Sweden and Norway as compared to 12 WHO European countries: A cross-sectional survey investigating maternal perspectives during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: Maternal-neonatal healthcare services were severely disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic in even high-income countries within the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region. The objective of this study was to compare trends in the quality of maternal and neonatal care (QMNC) in Sweden and Norway to 12 other countries from the WHO European Region during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to identify domains for improvement.

Material and methods: This cross-sectional study included women giving birth in Europe from March 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022. Women answered an online, anonymous questionnaire which included 40 WHO Standard-based Quality Measures collectively scored as the total QMNC index (0-400) and separately in four subdomains (0-100): provision of care, experience of care, availability of human and physical resources, and reorganizational changes due to COVID-19. To assess reported QMNC changes over time, we used adjusted quantile regression models.

Clinicaltrials: gov Identifier: NCT04847336.

Results: Of the 45151 women included in the study, 13 117 (29.1%) were from Sweden and Norway and 32034 (70.9%) from the 12 WHO European countries. The total QMNC index for Sweden and Norway (median: 325, IQR: 285-355) was higher than the 12 WHO European countries (median: 315, IQR: 265-350, p < 0.001) as were trends in QMNC index over time (Sweden and Norway median: 310-345; 12 WHO European countries median: 305-340). Sweden and Norway also had higher scores in three-of-four QMNC subdomains, with the 12 WHO European countries scoring higher only for reorganizational changes due to COVID-19. In adjusted quantile models of the total QMNC index, Sweden and Norway had higher scores, with largest differences in the lower quantiles (p < 0.001 in all percentiles).

Conclusions: Across Europe, there are significant gaps in the quality of maternal-neonatal healthcare services. Although women giving birth in Sweden and Norway reported higher QMNC scores in all subdomains except for "reorganizational changes due to COVID-19," there is room for improvement and shared learning across Europe. Policymakers should prioritize long-term investments in maternal and neonatal healthcare, ensuring that facilities are adequately equipped during public health crises and that all women have access to high-quality, evidence-based, equitable, and respectful care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Hospital obstetric volume and maternal outcomes: Does hospital size matter? Prediction of uterine rupture in singleton pregnancies with one prior cesarean birth undergoing TOLAC: A cross-sectional study. Maternal asthma during pregnancy and the likelihood of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring. May the indication for a previous cesarean section affect the outcome at trial of labor in women with induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study. The interplay of body mass index, gestational weight gain, and birthweight over 3800 g in vaginal breech birth: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1