飞行头盔附加测力计在测量颈部等长肌力时的可靠性。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS Aerospace medicine and human performance Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.3357/AMHP.6485.2024
Tuomas Honkanen, Ville Mattila, Otto Kinnunen, Marjo Janhunen, Roope Sovelius, Jani P Vaara, Heikki Kyröläinen
{"title":"飞行头盔附加测力计在测量颈部等长肌力时的可靠性。","authors":"Tuomas Honkanen, Ville Mattila, Otto Kinnunen, Marjo Janhunen, Roope Sovelius, Jani P Vaara, Heikki Kyröläinen","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6485.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Strong neck muscles may decrease the risk of flight-induced neck pain and possible disability among fast jet pilots. The purpose of this study was to examine the intra- and interrater reliability of a commercial force gauge attached to a pilot's helmet for measuring isometric force production of the neck muscles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 41 subjects performed maximal isometric cervical flexion, extension, and lateral flexion in two measurement sessions for intrarater reliability, and 31 of these subjects participated in a third session for measuring interrater reliability. Delayed muscle soreness and neck pain were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale before and after each measurement session. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare values between the test and retest assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall interrater reliability was good (ICC 0.79-0.90), whereas the intrarater reliability varied from moderate to good (ICC 0.58-0.84). In both intra- and interrater reliability, the flexion test had good (ICC 0.84-0.89) reliability, while the lateral flexion test results had moderate to good (ICC 0.73-0.90) reliability. The extension test had the lowest reliability in both intra- (ICC 0.58) and interrater (ICC 0.79) tests. The average visual analog scale score (from 1-100 scale) prior to the second measurement session was 16 ± 18 in delayed muscle soreness and 0 ± 0 in neck pain.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The present study demonstrated that the helmet-attached force gauge is a reliable, safe, and clinically applicable method to evaluate isometric neck strength in the flexion and lateral flexion directions. Honkanen T, Mattila V, Kinnunen O, Janhunen M, Sovelius R, Vaara JP, Kyröläinen H. Reliability of a flight helmet-attached force gauge in measuring isometric neck muscle strength. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(10):788-793.</p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"95 10","pages":"788-793"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of a Flight Helmet-Attached Force Gauge in Measuring Isometric Neck Muscle Strength.\",\"authors\":\"Tuomas Honkanen, Ville Mattila, Otto Kinnunen, Marjo Janhunen, Roope Sovelius, Jani P Vaara, Heikki Kyröläinen\",\"doi\":\"10.3357/AMHP.6485.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Strong neck muscles may decrease the risk of flight-induced neck pain and possible disability among fast jet pilots. The purpose of this study was to examine the intra- and interrater reliability of a commercial force gauge attached to a pilot's helmet for measuring isometric force production of the neck muscles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 41 subjects performed maximal isometric cervical flexion, extension, and lateral flexion in two measurement sessions for intrarater reliability, and 31 of these subjects participated in a third session for measuring interrater reliability. Delayed muscle soreness and neck pain were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale before and after each measurement session. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare values between the test and retest assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall interrater reliability was good (ICC 0.79-0.90), whereas the intrarater reliability varied from moderate to good (ICC 0.58-0.84). In both intra- and interrater reliability, the flexion test had good (ICC 0.84-0.89) reliability, while the lateral flexion test results had moderate to good (ICC 0.73-0.90) reliability. The extension test had the lowest reliability in both intra- (ICC 0.58) and interrater (ICC 0.79) tests. The average visual analog scale score (from 1-100 scale) prior to the second measurement session was 16 ± 18 in delayed muscle soreness and 0 ± 0 in neck pain.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The present study demonstrated that the helmet-attached force gauge is a reliable, safe, and clinically applicable method to evaluate isometric neck strength in the flexion and lateral flexion directions. Honkanen T, Mattila V, Kinnunen O, Janhunen M, Sovelius R, Vaara JP, Kyröläinen H. Reliability of a flight helmet-attached force gauge in measuring isometric neck muscle strength. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(10):788-793.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aerospace medicine and human performance\",\"volume\":\"95 10\",\"pages\":\"788-793\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aerospace medicine and human performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6485.2024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6485.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:颈部肌肉强健可降低快速喷气式飞机飞行员因飞行引起颈部疼痛和可能致残的风险。本研究的目的是检验安装在飞行员头盔上的商用测力计在测量颈部肌肉等长产力时的内部和交互可靠性:共有 41 名受试者在两次测量中进行了颈部最大等长屈、伸和侧屈运动,以测定其内部可靠性,其中 31 名受试者参加了第三次测量,以测定其内部可靠性。在每次测量前后,使用视觉模拟量表对延迟性肌肉酸痛和颈部疼痛进行评估。类内相关系数(ICC)用于比较测试和复测评估之间的数值:结果:研究人员之间的总体可靠性良好(ICC 0.79-0.90),而研究人员内部的可靠性从中等到良好不等(ICC 0.58-0.84)。在评分者内部和评分者之间的信度中,屈曲测试的信度良好(ICC 0.84-0.89),而侧屈测试结果的信度为中等至良好(ICC 0.73-0.90)。在内部测试(ICC 0.58)和相互测试(ICC 0.79)中,伸展测试的可靠性最低。在第二次测量前,延迟性肌肉酸痛的平均视觉模拟评分(1-100 分制)为 16 ± 18 分,颈部疼痛为 0 ± 0 分:本研究表明,头盔式测力计是一种可靠、安全且适用于临床的方法,可用于评估颈部屈曲和侧屈方向的等长力量。Honkanen T、Mattila V、Kinnunen O、Janhunen M、Sovelius R、Vaara JP、Kyröläinen H.飞行头盔附着测力计测量颈部等长肌力的可靠性。Aerosp Med Hum Perform.2024; 95(10):788-793.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of a Flight Helmet-Attached Force Gauge in Measuring Isometric Neck Muscle Strength.

Introduction: Strong neck muscles may decrease the risk of flight-induced neck pain and possible disability among fast jet pilots. The purpose of this study was to examine the intra- and interrater reliability of a commercial force gauge attached to a pilot's helmet for measuring isometric force production of the neck muscles.

Methods: A total of 41 subjects performed maximal isometric cervical flexion, extension, and lateral flexion in two measurement sessions for intrarater reliability, and 31 of these subjects participated in a third session for measuring interrater reliability. Delayed muscle soreness and neck pain were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale before and after each measurement session. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare values between the test and retest assessments.

Results: The overall interrater reliability was good (ICC 0.79-0.90), whereas the intrarater reliability varied from moderate to good (ICC 0.58-0.84). In both intra- and interrater reliability, the flexion test had good (ICC 0.84-0.89) reliability, while the lateral flexion test results had moderate to good (ICC 0.73-0.90) reliability. The extension test had the lowest reliability in both intra- (ICC 0.58) and interrater (ICC 0.79) tests. The average visual analog scale score (from 1-100 scale) prior to the second measurement session was 16 ± 18 in delayed muscle soreness and 0 ± 0 in neck pain.

Discussion: The present study demonstrated that the helmet-attached force gauge is a reliable, safe, and clinically applicable method to evaluate isometric neck strength in the flexion and lateral flexion directions. Honkanen T, Mattila V, Kinnunen O, Janhunen M, Sovelius R, Vaara JP, Kyröläinen H. Reliability of a flight helmet-attached force gauge in measuring isometric neck muscle strength. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(10):788-793.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
期刊最新文献
Aeromedical Considerations for Patient Safety in Aesthetic Medical Tourism. Book Review. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Responses to Nonhypoxic Hypobaric Decompression. Embolic Ischemic Cortical Stroke in a Young Flight Instructor with a Small Patent Foramen Ovale. Evolution of Space Medicine at NASA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1