使用再呼吸技术评估大脑血管运动对二氧化碳的反应性:日内和日间重复性评估。

Damsara Nandadeva, Rachel J Skow, Zachary T Martin, Jordan C Patik, Ziba Taherzadeh, Alison Ortiz, Yungfei Kao, Paul J Fadel, R Matthew Brothers
{"title":"使用再呼吸技术评估大脑血管运动对二氧化碳的反应性:日内和日间重复性评估。","authors":"Damsara Nandadeva, Rachel J Skow, Zachary T Martin, Jordan C Patik, Ziba Taherzadeh, Alison Ortiz, Yungfei Kao, Paul J Fadel, R Matthew Brothers","doi":"10.1152/ajpregu.00030.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cerebral vasodilator response to increased arterial carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) concentration, termed cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVMR), is used to assess cerebral vascular function. We sought to assess the within-day and between-day repeatability of CVMR to rebreathing-induced hypercapnia. Twelve healthy adults performed a <i>within-day short interval</i> protocol (17±2 minutes between trials), ten performed <i>a within-day long interval</i> protocol (145±16 minutes between trials), and seventeen performed a <i>between-day</i> protocol (5±2 days between visits). Repeatability of the slope of the percent change in middle cerebral artery mean blood velocity (%MCAv<sub>mean</sub>) and cerebral vascular conductance index (%CVCi), to the change in partial pressure of end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (PETCO<sub>2</sub>) between the two trials/days was assessed. <i>Within-day short interval</i> %MCAv<sub>mean</sub> slope demonstrated fair to excellent repeatability (intraclass correlation, ICC=0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.72-0.98]; p<0.001) while %CVCi slope showed more variability (ICC=0.84 [0.47-0.95]; p=0.002]). <i>Within-day long interval</i>, %MCAv<sub>mean</sub> (ICC=0.95 [0.80-0.99]) and %CVCi (ICC=0.94 [0.71-0.99]) slopes showed good to excellent and fair to excellent repeatability respectively (p<0.001 for both). For <i>between-day</i> trials, better repeatability was observed for %CVCi (ICC=0.85 [0.57-0.95]; p<0.001) compared to %MCAv<sub>mean</sub> (ICC=0.76 [0.33-0.91]; p=0.004) slope. These findings indicate repeatable <i>within- and between-day</i> CVMR responses to rebreathe induced hypercapnia. However, a longer interval may be better for <i>within-day</i> repeat trials, particularly for CVCi measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":7630,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cerebral Vasomotor Reactivity to Carbon Dioxide Using the Rebreathe Technique: Assessment of Within-day and Between-day Repeatability.\",\"authors\":\"Damsara Nandadeva, Rachel J Skow, Zachary T Martin, Jordan C Patik, Ziba Taherzadeh, Alison Ortiz, Yungfei Kao, Paul J Fadel, R Matthew Brothers\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/ajpregu.00030.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The cerebral vasodilator response to increased arterial carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) concentration, termed cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVMR), is used to assess cerebral vascular function. We sought to assess the within-day and between-day repeatability of CVMR to rebreathing-induced hypercapnia. Twelve healthy adults performed a <i>within-day short interval</i> protocol (17±2 minutes between trials), ten performed <i>a within-day long interval</i> protocol (145±16 minutes between trials), and seventeen performed a <i>between-day</i> protocol (5±2 days between visits). Repeatability of the slope of the percent change in middle cerebral artery mean blood velocity (%MCAv<sub>mean</sub>) and cerebral vascular conductance index (%CVCi), to the change in partial pressure of end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (PETCO<sub>2</sub>) between the two trials/days was assessed. <i>Within-day short interval</i> %MCAv<sub>mean</sub> slope demonstrated fair to excellent repeatability (intraclass correlation, ICC=0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.72-0.98]; p<0.001) while %CVCi slope showed more variability (ICC=0.84 [0.47-0.95]; p=0.002]). <i>Within-day long interval</i>, %MCAv<sub>mean</sub> (ICC=0.95 [0.80-0.99]) and %CVCi (ICC=0.94 [0.71-0.99]) slopes showed good to excellent and fair to excellent repeatability respectively (p<0.001 for both). For <i>between-day</i> trials, better repeatability was observed for %CVCi (ICC=0.85 [0.57-0.95]; p<0.001) compared to %MCAv<sub>mean</sub> (ICC=0.76 [0.33-0.91]; p=0.004) slope. These findings indicate repeatable <i>within- and between-day</i> CVMR responses to rebreathe induced hypercapnia. However, a longer interval may be better for <i>within-day</i> repeat trials, particularly for CVCi measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00030.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00030.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑血管对动脉二氧化碳(CO2)浓度升高的反应被称为脑血管运动反应性(CVMR),用于评估脑血管功能。我们试图评估 CVMR 对回气诱导的高碳酸血症的日内和日间可重复性。12 名健康成人进行了日内短间隔方案(试验间隔时间为 17±2 分钟),10 人进行了日内长间隔方案(试验间隔时间为 145±16 分钟),17 人进行了日间方案(访问间隔时间为 5±2 天)。评估了两次试验/天之间大脑中动脉平均血流速度(%MCAvmean)和脑血管传导指数(%CVCi)的百分比变化与潮气末二氧化碳分压(PETCO2)变化的斜率的可重复性。日内短间隔 %MCAvmean 斜率显示出相当到极佳的可重复性(类内相关性,ICC=0.92 [95% 置信区间 0.72-0.98];p日内长间隔 %MCAvmean (ICC=0.95 [0.80-0.99]) 和 %CVCi (ICC=0.94 [0.71-0.99]) 。94[0.71-0.99])斜率的可重复性分别为良好至优秀和一般至优秀(p在日间试验中,观察到%CVCi(ICC=0.85[0.57-0.95];pmean(ICC=0.76[0.33-0.91];p=0.004)斜率的可重复性更好。这些研究结果表明,再通气诱导高碳酸血症时的日内和日间 CVMR 反应具有可重复性。不过,日内重复试验的间隔时间可能更长,尤其是 CVCi 测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cerebral Vasomotor Reactivity to Carbon Dioxide Using the Rebreathe Technique: Assessment of Within-day and Between-day Repeatability.

The cerebral vasodilator response to increased arterial carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration, termed cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVMR), is used to assess cerebral vascular function. We sought to assess the within-day and between-day repeatability of CVMR to rebreathing-induced hypercapnia. Twelve healthy adults performed a within-day short interval protocol (17±2 minutes between trials), ten performed a within-day long interval protocol (145±16 minutes between trials), and seventeen performed a between-day protocol (5±2 days between visits). Repeatability of the slope of the percent change in middle cerebral artery mean blood velocity (%MCAvmean) and cerebral vascular conductance index (%CVCi), to the change in partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2) between the two trials/days was assessed. Within-day short interval %MCAvmean slope demonstrated fair to excellent repeatability (intraclass correlation, ICC=0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.72-0.98]; p<0.001) while %CVCi slope showed more variability (ICC=0.84 [0.47-0.95]; p=0.002]). Within-day long interval, %MCAvmean (ICC=0.95 [0.80-0.99]) and %CVCi (ICC=0.94 [0.71-0.99]) slopes showed good to excellent and fair to excellent repeatability respectively (p<0.001 for both). For between-day trials, better repeatability was observed for %CVCi (ICC=0.85 [0.57-0.95]; p<0.001) compared to %MCAvmean (ICC=0.76 [0.33-0.91]; p=0.004) slope. These findings indicate repeatable within- and between-day CVMR responses to rebreathe induced hypercapnia. However, a longer interval may be better for within-day repeat trials, particularly for CVCi measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
145
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology publishes original investigations that illuminate normal or abnormal regulation and integration of physiological mechanisms at all levels of biological organization, ranging from molecules to humans, including clinical investigations. Major areas of emphasis include regulation in genetically modified animals; model organisms; development and tissue plasticity; neurohumoral control of circulation and hypertension; local control of circulation; cardiac and renal integration; thirst and volume, electrolyte homeostasis; glucose homeostasis and energy balance; appetite and obesity; inflammation and cytokines; integrative physiology of pregnancy-parturition-lactation; and thermoregulation and adaptations to exercise and environmental stress.
期刊最新文献
Cerebral hemodynamic and systemic physiological changes in trained freedivers completing sled-assisted dives to two different depths. Modulation of cutaneous vasodilation by reactive oxygen species during local and whole body heating in young and older adults. Relationship between regional sympathetic vascular transduction and sympathetic transduction of blood pressure in young adults at rest. Steering toward new horizons: a vision for the future of the American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. Comparative analysis of acute eccentric contraction-induced changes to the skeletal muscle transcriptome in young and aged mice and humans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1