IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1152/ajpheart.00556.2024
Kristen G Davis, Matthew K Armstrong, Virginia R Nuckols, Meaghan N Smith, Ryan Pewowaruk, Colin J Gimblet, Donna A Santillan, Mark K Santillan, Gary L Pierce
{"title":"Load-Dependent Mechanisms Contribute to Increased Aortic Stiffness Among Women with a History of Preeclampsia: Relation with Cardiovagal Baroreflex Sensitivity.","authors":"Kristen G Davis, Matthew K Armstrong, Virginia R Nuckols, Meaghan N Smith, Ryan Pewowaruk, Colin J Gimblet, Donna A Santillan, Mark K Santillan, Gary L Pierce","doi":"10.1152/ajpheart.00556.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction</i>: Preeclampsia, a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, results in increased lifetime cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Total aortic stiffness, a robust risk factor for CVD, is composed of load-dependent (blood pressure load on arterial wall) and structural (intrinsic changes in arterial wall) mechanisms. Total aortic stiffness is also associated with reduced cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). We sought to determine 1) whether elevated total aortic stiffness among women with a history of preeclampsia (hxPE) is attributed to load-dependent or structural stiffness, and 2) whether either mechanism is associated with lower BRS. <i>Methods</i>: Total aortic stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity) and spontaneous cardiovagal BRS (sequence technique) were measured among women 1-5 years postpartum (n=115; age 34 ±4yrs; hxPE n=51; controls n=64). Structural aortic stiffness was calculated from participant-specific exponential models, standardizing aortic stiffness to a 'reference' blood pressure. Load-dependent stiffness was calculated as total minus structural stiffness. <i>Results</i>: Total (+0.8 m/sec, 95% CI (-0.99, -0.23), p=0.002) and load-dependent (+0.4 m/sec, 95% CI (-0.56, -0.22), P<0.001), but not structural (95% CI (-0.52, 0.08), p=0.16), aortic stiffness were higher among women with hxPE compared with controls. Women with a hxPE had lower BRS (p=0.042) that was negatively associated with total (B =-3.24 ms/mmHg, 95% CI (-6.35, -0.13), p=0.042) and load-dependent (B =-5.91ms/mmHg, 95% CI (-11.31, -0.51), p=0.033) aortic stiffness. <i>Conclusion</i>: Load-dependent, not structural, aortic stiffness mechanisms contribute to higher total aortic stiffness among women with hxPE and was associated with lower cardiovagal BRS. Postpartum BP monitoring is critical to reduce increased CVD risk in preeclampsia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7692,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00556.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:子痫前期是一种妊娠期高血压疾病,会导致终生心血管疾病(CVD)风险增加。主动脉总僵硬度是心血管疾病的一个重要风险因素,由负荷依赖性(血压对动脉壁的负荷)和结构性(动脉壁的内在变化)机制组成。主动脉总僵硬度还与心迷走气压反射敏感性(BRS)降低有关。我们试图确定:1)有子痫前期病史(hxPE)的妇女的主动脉总僵硬度升高是由于负荷依赖性僵硬还是结构性僵硬;2)这两种机制是否都与较低的 BRS 有关。方法:对产后1-5年的妇女(n=115;年龄34 ±4岁;hxPE n=51;对照组 n=64)进行了主动脉总僵硬度(颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度)和自发心迷走神经BRS(序列技术)测量。结构性主动脉僵硬度由参与者特定的指数模型计算得出,将主动脉僵硬度标准化为 "参考 "血压。负荷相关僵硬度按总僵硬度减去结构僵硬度计算。结果如下总僵硬度(+0.8 米/秒,95% CI (-0.99, -0.23),P=0.002)和负荷依赖性僵硬度(+0.4 米/秒,95% CI (-0.56, -0.22),PC=0.002):负荷依赖性主动脉僵化机制(而非结构性主动脉僵化机制)导致患有 hxPE 的女性主动脉总僵化度升高,并与较低的心迷走神经 BRS 有关。产后血压监测对于降低子痫前期增加的心血管疾病风险至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Load-Dependent Mechanisms Contribute to Increased Aortic Stiffness Among Women with a History of Preeclampsia: Relation with Cardiovagal Baroreflex Sensitivity.

Introduction: Preeclampsia, a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, results in increased lifetime cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Total aortic stiffness, a robust risk factor for CVD, is composed of load-dependent (blood pressure load on arterial wall) and structural (intrinsic changes in arterial wall) mechanisms. Total aortic stiffness is also associated with reduced cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). We sought to determine 1) whether elevated total aortic stiffness among women with a history of preeclampsia (hxPE) is attributed to load-dependent or structural stiffness, and 2) whether either mechanism is associated with lower BRS. Methods: Total aortic stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity) and spontaneous cardiovagal BRS (sequence technique) were measured among women 1-5 years postpartum (n=115; age 34 ±4yrs; hxPE n=51; controls n=64). Structural aortic stiffness was calculated from participant-specific exponential models, standardizing aortic stiffness to a 'reference' blood pressure. Load-dependent stiffness was calculated as total minus structural stiffness. Results: Total (+0.8 m/sec, 95% CI (-0.99, -0.23), p=0.002) and load-dependent (+0.4 m/sec, 95% CI (-0.56, -0.22), P<0.001), but not structural (95% CI (-0.52, 0.08), p=0.16), aortic stiffness were higher among women with hxPE compared with controls. Women with a hxPE had lower BRS (p=0.042) that was negatively associated with total (B =-3.24 ms/mmHg, 95% CI (-6.35, -0.13), p=0.042) and load-dependent (B =-5.91ms/mmHg, 95% CI (-11.31, -0.51), p=0.033) aortic stiffness. Conclusion: Load-dependent, not structural, aortic stiffness mechanisms contribute to higher total aortic stiffness among women with hxPE and was associated with lower cardiovagal BRS. Postpartum BP monitoring is critical to reduce increased CVD risk in preeclampsia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology publishes original investigations, reviews and perspectives on the physiology of the heart, vasculature, and lymphatics. These articles include experimental and theoretical studies of cardiovascular function at all levels of organization ranging from the intact and integrative animal and organ function to the cellular, subcellular, and molecular levels. The journal embraces new descriptions of these functions and their control systems, as well as their basis in biochemistry, biophysics, genetics, and cell biology. Preference is given to research that provides significant new mechanistic physiological insights that determine the performance of the normal and abnormal heart and circulation.
期刊最新文献
Biomarkers of intestinal permeability are associated with inflammation in metabolically healthy obesity but not normal-weight obesity. Atrial pacing improves mitochondrial function in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Under pressure: Does antenatal stress last until adulthood? Load-Dependent Mechanisms Contribute to Increased Aortic Stiffness Among Women with a History of Preeclampsia: Relation with Cardiovagal Baroreflex Sensitivity. miRNA and mRNA Expression Signatures in A HFpEF Large Animal Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1