奥氮平和喹硫平:重症患者的校正 QT 变化。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1177/10600280241290254
Kaden Shen, Kevin M Dube, Jeremy R DeGrado, Paul M Szumita, Kenneth E Lupi
{"title":"奥氮平和喹硫平:重症患者的校正 QT 变化。","authors":"Kaden Shen, Kevin M Dube, Jeremy R DeGrado, Paul M Szumita, Kenneth E Lupi","doi":"10.1177/10600280241290254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Olanzapine and quetiapine are frequently administered atypical antipsychotic medications and their effects on the corrected QT (QTc) in the critically ill population remain understudied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the impact of olanzapine and quetiapine on QTc changes in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, retrospective analysis. Adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2023 through July 2023 were included if they received ≥2 doses of either olanzapine or quetiapine within a 48-hour period and had one QTc evaluated within 48 hours of antipsychotic initiation. The major endpoint was a composite of the incidence of QTc prolongation (defined as QTc > 500 ms or QTc > 60 ms above baseline) following antipsychotic initiation. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify risk factors for QTc prolongation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistical difference in the major composite endpoint between patients in the olanzapine and quetiapine groups (8/83 [9.6%] vs 19/129 [14.7%]; <i>P</i> = .28). The incidence of QTc > 500 ms (7/244 [2.9%] vs 20/427 [4.7%]; <i>P</i> = .25) and change from baseline >60 ms (5/244 [2.0%] vs 17/427 [4.0%]; <i>P</i> = .26) were not statistically different between the olanzapine and quetiapine groups, respectively. There were no occurrences of Torsades de Pointes or extrapyramidal symptoms in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>The results of this study suggest olanzapine and quetiapine may have similar impact on QTc prolongation in critically ill patients. These findings could contribute to safer prescribing practices in the ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Olanzapine Versus Quetiapine: Corrected QT Changes in Critically Ill Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Kaden Shen, Kevin M Dube, Jeremy R DeGrado, Paul M Szumita, Kenneth E Lupi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10600280241290254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Olanzapine and quetiapine are frequently administered atypical antipsychotic medications and their effects on the corrected QT (QTc) in the critically ill population remain understudied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare the impact of olanzapine and quetiapine on QTc changes in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, retrospective analysis. Adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2023 through July 2023 were included if they received ≥2 doses of either olanzapine or quetiapine within a 48-hour period and had one QTc evaluated within 48 hours of antipsychotic initiation. The major endpoint was a composite of the incidence of QTc prolongation (defined as QTc > 500 ms or QTc > 60 ms above baseline) following antipsychotic initiation. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify risk factors for QTc prolongation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistical difference in the major composite endpoint between patients in the olanzapine and quetiapine groups (8/83 [9.6%] vs 19/129 [14.7%]; <i>P</i> = .28). The incidence of QTc > 500 ms (7/244 [2.9%] vs 20/427 [4.7%]; <i>P</i> = .25) and change from baseline >60 ms (5/244 [2.0%] vs 17/427 [4.0%]; <i>P</i> = .26) were not statistically different between the olanzapine and quetiapine groups, respectively. There were no occurrences of Torsades de Pointes or extrapyramidal symptoms in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>The results of this study suggest olanzapine and quetiapine may have similar impact on QTc prolongation in critically ill patients. These findings could contribute to safer prescribing practices in the ICU.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241290254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241290254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:奥氮平和喹硫平是常用的非典型抗精神病药物,但它们对重症患者校正QT(QTc)的影响仍未得到充分研究:本研究旨在比较奥氮平和喹硫平对重症患者 QTc 变化的影响:这是一项单中心回顾性分析。从 2023 年 1 月到 2023 年 7 月入住重症监护室(ICU)的成人患者,如果在 48 小时内接受了≥2 次奥氮平或喹硫平治疗,并且在开始使用抗精神病药物的 48 小时内进行了一次 QTc 评估,则纳入研究对象。主要终点是开始使用抗精神病药物后QTc延长(定义为QTc > 500毫秒或QTc >基线以上60毫秒)发生率的综合结果。研究人员进行了单变量和多变量分析,以确定QTc延长的风险因素:奥氮平组和喹硫平组患者的主要复合终点无统计学差异(8/83 [9.6%] vs 19/129 [14.7%];P = .28)。奥氮平组与喹硫平组的 QTc > 500 ms 发生率(7/244 [2.9%] vs 20/427 [4.7%];P = .25)和基线变化 > 60 ms 发生率(5/244 [2.0%] vs 17/427 [4.0%];P = .26)分别没有统计学差异。两组患者均未出现心搏过速或锥体外系症状:本研究结果表明,奥氮平和喹硫平对重症患者 QTc 延长的影响相似。这些发现有助于在重症监护病房中采用更安全的处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Olanzapine Versus Quetiapine: Corrected QT Changes in Critically Ill Patients.

Background: Olanzapine and quetiapine are frequently administered atypical antipsychotic medications and their effects on the corrected QT (QTc) in the critically ill population remain understudied.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the impact of olanzapine and quetiapine on QTc changes in critically ill patients.

Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective analysis. Adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2023 through July 2023 were included if they received ≥2 doses of either olanzapine or quetiapine within a 48-hour period and had one QTc evaluated within 48 hours of antipsychotic initiation. The major endpoint was a composite of the incidence of QTc prolongation (defined as QTc > 500 ms or QTc > 60 ms above baseline) following antipsychotic initiation. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify risk factors for QTc prolongation.

Results: There was no statistical difference in the major composite endpoint between patients in the olanzapine and quetiapine groups (8/83 [9.6%] vs 19/129 [14.7%]; P = .28). The incidence of QTc > 500 ms (7/244 [2.9%] vs 20/427 [4.7%]; P = .25) and change from baseline >60 ms (5/244 [2.0%] vs 17/427 [4.0%]; P = .26) were not statistically different between the olanzapine and quetiapine groups, respectively. There were no occurrences of Torsades de Pointes or extrapyramidal symptoms in either group.

Conclusion and relevance: The results of this study suggest olanzapine and quetiapine may have similar impact on QTc prolongation in critically ill patients. These findings could contribute to safer prescribing practices in the ICU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1