Helen Pham, Kerry Hitos, Rishan Pawaskar, Jane-Louise Sinclair, Hazel Mathuthu, Christopher B Nahm, Tony Pang, Vincent Lam, Arthur Richardson
{"title":"减少澳大利亚外科手术再住院率的多学科方案:美国外科学院全国手术质量改进计划。","authors":"Helen Pham, Kerry Hitos, Rishan Pawaskar, Jane-Louise Sinclair, Hazel Mathuthu, Christopher B Nahm, Tony Pang, Vincent Lam, Arthur Richardson","doi":"10.1111/ans.19252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Unplanned readmissions in general surgery are an important quality indicator of patient care and are associated with increased costs to healthcare services. This study aims to implement a multidisciplinary protocol in a single institution in a tertiary referral hospital to monitor and reduce unplanned readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study using an institution-based protocol was conducted over an 18-month period including patients undergoing a general surgical procedure. The protocol included: (i) implementation of a surgical readmissions nurse-patient liaison; (ii) access to a surgical walk-in clinic; and (iii) early post-discharge phone contact. Data included demographic details, index procedure, hospital length of stay (LOS), and whether contact between patient/nurse occurred upon discharge. The primary outcome was the cause and rate of 30-day readmissions. Secondary outcomes were mortality, use of surgical clinic, emergency department presentations, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After protocol implementation, 874 patients underwent a general surgical procedure, with 354 (49%) being male and an overall median age of 53.0 years (interquartile range: 36.0-67.0). The overall readmission rate was 5.6% (n = 49), with a median LOS after readmission of 4 days. Compared with historical pre-protocol ACS-NSQIP data, this reflects a 30% reduction compared to that of readmission rate of 7.9%, P = 0.03.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The multidisciplinary protocol was efficacious in significantly reducing unplanned readmissions. Continued audits and monitoring of factors associated with readmissions are required to help design targeted projects that may lead to improved outcomes, lower costs, increased patient satisfaction, and better efficiency within our healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidisciplinary protocol to reduce surgical readmissions in Australia: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.\",\"authors\":\"Helen Pham, Kerry Hitos, Rishan Pawaskar, Jane-Louise Sinclair, Hazel Mathuthu, Christopher B Nahm, Tony Pang, Vincent Lam, Arthur Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ans.19252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Unplanned readmissions in general surgery are an important quality indicator of patient care and are associated with increased costs to healthcare services. This study aims to implement a multidisciplinary protocol in a single institution in a tertiary referral hospital to monitor and reduce unplanned readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study using an institution-based protocol was conducted over an 18-month period including patients undergoing a general surgical procedure. The protocol included: (i) implementation of a surgical readmissions nurse-patient liaison; (ii) access to a surgical walk-in clinic; and (iii) early post-discharge phone contact. Data included demographic details, index procedure, hospital length of stay (LOS), and whether contact between patient/nurse occurred upon discharge. The primary outcome was the cause and rate of 30-day readmissions. Secondary outcomes were mortality, use of surgical clinic, emergency department presentations, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After protocol implementation, 874 patients underwent a general surgical procedure, with 354 (49%) being male and an overall median age of 53.0 years (interquartile range: 36.0-67.0). The overall readmission rate was 5.6% (n = 49), with a median LOS after readmission of 4 days. Compared with historical pre-protocol ACS-NSQIP data, this reflects a 30% reduction compared to that of readmission rate of 7.9%, P = 0.03.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The multidisciplinary protocol was efficacious in significantly reducing unplanned readmissions. Continued audits and monitoring of factors associated with readmissions are required to help design targeted projects that may lead to improved outcomes, lower costs, increased patient satisfaction, and better efficiency within our healthcare system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ANZ Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ANZ Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19252\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multidisciplinary protocol to reduce surgical readmissions in Australia: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Introduction: Unplanned readmissions in general surgery are an important quality indicator of patient care and are associated with increased costs to healthcare services. This study aims to implement a multidisciplinary protocol in a single institution in a tertiary referral hospital to monitor and reduce unplanned readmission rates.
Methods: A prospective cohort study using an institution-based protocol was conducted over an 18-month period including patients undergoing a general surgical procedure. The protocol included: (i) implementation of a surgical readmissions nurse-patient liaison; (ii) access to a surgical walk-in clinic; and (iii) early post-discharge phone contact. Data included demographic details, index procedure, hospital length of stay (LOS), and whether contact between patient/nurse occurred upon discharge. The primary outcome was the cause and rate of 30-day readmissions. Secondary outcomes were mortality, use of surgical clinic, emergency department presentations, and complications.
Results: After protocol implementation, 874 patients underwent a general surgical procedure, with 354 (49%) being male and an overall median age of 53.0 years (interquartile range: 36.0-67.0). The overall readmission rate was 5.6% (n = 49), with a median LOS after readmission of 4 days. Compared with historical pre-protocol ACS-NSQIP data, this reflects a 30% reduction compared to that of readmission rate of 7.9%, P = 0.03.
Conclusion: The multidisciplinary protocol was efficacious in significantly reducing unplanned readmissions. Continued audits and monitoring of factors associated with readmissions are required to help design targeted projects that may lead to improved outcomes, lower costs, increased patient satisfaction, and better efficiency within our healthcare system.
期刊介绍:
ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.